Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Investigating the impact of child abuse on parents
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Investigating the impact of child abuse on parents
In the United States, nearly 700,000 children suffer from abuse annually. Almost 80% of these children are victimized by their parents. (National Statistics on Child Abuse, 2015). As a result of ongoing torment, the child victims are driven to the ultimate last resort: they kill their abusers. This type of crime, known as parricide, occurs as frequently as once per day in the U.S. (The Psychology of Parricide: When Children Kill Their Own Parents, 2017). When or if convicted, minor children (younger than age 18) who kill their abusive parents should receive lenient sentences due to the circumstances and situations that led to parricide.
Survivors of predatory crimes are often blamed for their behavior, questioned about their actions, and suspected
…show more content…
While his father was passed out drunk, Mark saw an opportunity to end years of abuse and took his father’s gun, fatally shooting him. Afterwards, Mark’s sister announced to the media that she felt Mark had “done us all a wonderful favor.” (NY Times article: “Youth Says He Killed Father After Years of Mistreatment”, 1983) Fortunately for Mark, he had several witnesses to his years of suffering who came forward to support him. When the criminal court in Massachusetts heard from the witnesses, they sentenced Mark to six months probation for parricide. Mark was fortunate that his abuse had been visible enough that others could corroborate his claims. He was also allowed to attend school and maintain contact with people outside of his home. The court’s decision in Martone’s case provides an excellent precedent for other cases where abused children ultimately make the decision to kill. Other children who might not have had as much corroboration as Martone could still deserve no more than six months of probation for their …show more content…
(About Healing Sisters & Stacey Lannert, 2006). After 18 years in prison, Lannert was pardoned by Missouri Governor, Matt Blunt. Since being pardoned, Lannert has become a crusader for children survivors of abuse. She also supports adults who are survivors. Lannert runs a foundation: Healing Sisters, non-profit and support group. She has also published two books about her experiences, Redemption: The Story of Sisterhood, Survival, and Finding Freedom Behind Bars and I Shot Daddy: She Killed Her Father to Protect Her Sister. Since being released, Lannert has maintained a clean record and has never committed any other crimes. Lannert received a harsher sentence than either Martone or Rowe. One reason could possibly be that she and her sister conspired to cover up their crime which made it seem like they were not justified in their actions. Another factor working against them was that they did not have numerous neighbors and teachers supporting their cause. Regardless, these abuse victims were pushed beyond their limit and forced to fend for themselves by attacking their
Within the last five years, violent offenses by children have increased 68 percent, crimes such as: murder, rape, assault, and robbery. Honestly, with these figures, it is not surprising at all that the Juveniles Courts focus less on the children in danger, and focus more on dangerous children. This in fact is most likely the underlying reasoning behind juveniles being tried as adults by imposing harsher and stiffer sentences. However, these policies fail to recognize the developmental differences between young people and
Juveniles don’t deserve life sentences without parole for many reasons but one main reason is becase people don’t know a person’s life at home and sometimes living in a broken home can affect their social life. According to the article “Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents”, the author Scott Anderson states that,“The only way to unlock the mysteries of the psyche is to dissect your childhood, especially the formative influence of your parents” (Anderson 56), proving that juveniles are easily influenced to do terrifying crimes and is not their fault because no one was there to guide them.
The tragic case of Larry and Brandon is a compelling story. It is a reality that stunned the city of Oxnard California when a 14-year-old boy named Brandon McInerney fatally shot a fellow classmate, Larry King, twice in the back of the head. The incident occurred in a computer lab where Brandon ran off after committing the crime. As a result of his actions Brandon McInerney was tried as an adult and was sentenced to 21 years in prison with no chance of parole. He will be released at the age of 39. Now the underlying question is was Brandon’s sentence a just resolution or should he have received more or less years in prison. The truth is that I believe Brandon’s verdict was a fair and just punishment, however I don’t believe that he should have been tried as an adult. There’s no question about it what Brandon did was horrible. He killed a kid in cold blood and ran off after doing it. He knows what he did and now he has to suffer the consequences. But Brandon was only 14 years old when this had taken place.
In the article On Punishment and Teen Killers by Jenkins, sadly brings to our attention that kids are sometimes responsible for unimaginable crimes, in 1990 in a suburban Chicago neighborhood a teenager murdered a women, her husband, and her unborn child, as she begged for the life of her unborn child he shot her and later reported to a close friend that it was a “thrill kill”, that he just simply wanted to see what it felt like to shoot someone. A major recent issue being debated is whether or not we have the right to sentence Juveniles who commit heinous crimes to life in adult penitentiaries without parole. I strongly believe and agree with the law that states adolescents who commit these heinous crimes should be tried as adults and sentenced as adults, however I don’t believe they should be sentenced to life without parole. I chose this position because I believe that these young adults in no way should be excused for their actions and need to face the severe consequences of their actions. Although on the other hand I believe change is possible and that prison could be rehabilitating and that parole should be offered.
Six years ago, Arnold Curwing accidentally shot his brother with a .22 caliber rifle. He was nine years old at the time. Surrounding this incident, as you would expect, he was under fire by his neighbors and peers from thereon, even though it was an accident. Generally, they all blamed him. Some detested him for not getting in trouble. Some might debate that he got not enough punishment. Others might conclude that the knowledge of living the rest of his life knowing that he killed his brother would be punishment enough. The people that he loved, the people he was closest to blamed him, including his mother and sister blamed him. This is the kind of thing that a person nine years of age does not forget. For this reason I make the following analysis.
Looking at statistics from the National Institutes of Health, as of 2004 in the US, 311 of 578 (53.8%) children under the age of five were murdered by their parents. From 1976 to 2004, maternal filicide accounted for 30 percent of all children under the age of five, while paternal filicide accounted for 31 percent (West, NIH, 2007). These methods are most common in infant cases, by 69 percent. As the child ages, weapons are more likely to be used by a percentage of 72.3 (Orenstein). Highly publicized cases shine the light on parental mental health and how it can affect children.
For one, unlike Ian he was convicted and found guilty of a non-homicide crime yet still also found himself in a life sentence. For better or for worse, Joe wasn’t confined but “was [instead] repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted,” the trauma from which eventually caused him to develop multiple sclerosis (Stevenson 259). Unfortunately, these two cases are not uncommon in the justice world. As a matter of fact, “by 2010, Florida had sentenced more than a hundred children to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide offenses,” (Stevenson 153). One of the primary reasons for this originated in the idea that harsher punishments will act as a deterrent for kids who want to break the law. However, recently studies have suggested that because the prefrontal lobe of the brain is still in development until the age of twenty, children don’t have the mental capacity to make the best decisions, especially under stress. Additionally, children normally wouldn’t have access to weapons or drugs, which allows the argument that adults should be held responsible for making such objects available to them in the first place
Since the case of Mary Ellen Wilson in 1874, child abuse has seen it’s share of light in published news. It is disheartening to read countless stories of future generations being harmed to the extent of psychological damage or even death. Child abuse as a whole has been addressed multiple times in various news blogs, however, nothing has been done to work towards abolishing it at a larger level. The future of America is in jeopardy based on the level of abuse that children endure. Childhelp states that approximately 5 children die every day at the hands of child abuse. America struggles to find equality, and by bystanding the stripping of its youth, continual prolonging is inevitable. Raising this nation’s children in means of nurturing and care is the first step to uplifting America as a whole. In 2012 alone, 1593 of America’s children died at the hands of child abuse, 70.3% of which were younger than the age of three (Safe Horizon). In order to prevent further child abuse, the American government should address stricter child protection laws, psychological stability, and an increase the recognition of those that have released their stories.
It is expected that at a young age, children are taught the difference between what is right and what is wrong in all types of situations. The majority of Supreme Court Justices abolished mandatory life in prison for juveniles that commit heinous crimes, argued this with the consideration of age immaturity, impetuosity, and also negative family and home environments. These violent crimes can be defined as murder, rape, armed robbery, aggravated assault and the like depending on state law. With these monstrous acts in mind the supreme court justices argument could be proven otherwise through capability and accountability, the underdevelopment of the teenage brain and the severity of the crime. Juveniles commit heinous crimes just like adults
Lavallee was frightened, and did not know what would happen next. At that point Lavallee made the “kill or be killed” decision. Rust was leaving and Lavallee fired two shots, one did not hit him and the second shot hit Rust in the back of the head. Lavallee was then charged with second degree murder, but it was argued in her trial that she carried this out in self defense. Expert witness Dr. Fred Shane informed the court that Lavallee suffered from “Battered Wife Syndrome”; results from a woman who suffers emotional and physical from the abuse from their partners. Lavallee’s verdict at Manitoba’s Queen Bench was an acquittal. The decision was overturned by the Manitoba’s court of Appeals because they believed the expert testimony given by Dr. Fred Shane shouldn’t be admissible. The Supreme Court of Canada appealed this case again upholding the original verdict because without the expert testimony; it would be impossible for a jury to appreciate Lavallee’s position and mindset without understanding Battered Woman Syndrome (Lavallee Summary,
Many people claim that the child did not know any better, or that he was brought up with the idea that this behavior is acceptable. Although there is some truth to these allegations, the reality of this social issue is far more complex. Therefore we ask the question, "Should childhood offenders of capital crimes be treated as adults?" To begin with, numerous reasons for why a child acts in the manner he exhibits and why he continues to exert such dangerous and even fatal schemes. Recent research shows that factors ranging from inherited personality traits to chemical imbalances and damages suffered in the womb can increase the odds that a child will become violent (Johnson 234).
Ninety years later, the Leopold and Loeb case still remains significant in American modern society. Clarence Darrow’s techniques have influenced today’s law system and stimulated psychological explorations of childhood development. Today we hear and see teenagers committing crimes all over the nation. However, the media continues to publicize global current events. Due to the Leopold and Loeb case, America’s perspective regarding childhood, psychiatry, and the media has and continues to evolve over the years.
Maker, J., Brittain, J., Piraino, G., & Somtow, S. Children Who Kill. World Press Review. June 1993 v40 n6 p21-23.
While many argue that juveniles who commit serious crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults, the fact is, juveniles under the age of eighteen, are not adults, and should not be treated as such. Juveniles are not mature enough or developed psychologically, and, therefore, do not consider the consequences of their actions. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Thompson, the writer argues that juveniles are not adults. Their brains develop at different stages and they learn skills that they need to learn at a certain time.
When the topic of abuse comes up, many different forms of abuse pop into individuals heads. Whether its Physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal abuse or even drug abuse, the list just keeps going. Now take all those different forms abuse and imagine them happening in a family. A father physically abusing his children, a mother verbally berating her daughter about her body image, a child growing up in fear. According to the research by David Wolfe in the Journal of Consulting and clinical Psychology, that the number of children that have suffered a physical injury due to physical abuse is between 1.4 and 1.9 million annually. With such a high number of physical abuse happening to children, one can imagine how high the number of all the