Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Risk for children and young people using the internet
Risks of children being online
Reduce risks from children using the internet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One major debate in the parenting world is whether parents should use spyware to monitor their children online. One side of the argument is that parents need to monitor their children in order to prevent them from becoming involved in the many unsafe situations that they could become a part of online. Another point of view is that monitoring a child’s online activity is wrong and an invasion of their privacy. Both of these points of view have some great points. The Internet can be an incredibly dangerous place and children need some degree of supervision while going online, but children need to be made aware that they’re being monitored and their privacy should be respected. The online world is a perilous place full of terrible people and children need some form of supervision because the Internet could ruin their lives. When children go online, they become susceptible to a multitude of danger, and they might be doing things on the Internet that are inappropriate. They also might be receiving highly inappropriate …show more content…
Spyware can assist parents in keeping their children safe online. It enables parents to guard their children from being put in risky positions. There are so many awful things that could happen to a child online that could easily be prevented by a parent’s supervision. On the other hand, spyware could cause more damage than benefit if it used irresponsibly. If a child is not told that they are being monitored, their privacy is being violated and if they were to discover that they are being monitored, it could damage the trust between them and their parents. Also, it’s very wrong for parents to use spyware to look into every single thing that their child does on the Internet, they should only be looking into their child’s alarming online activity. Parents need to realize that spyware needs to be used in a responsible fashion in order for it to truly be
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
Internet is advancing every day, parents have no idea what their kids are doing in cyberspace and are contemplating the idea of spyware. In the article, “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben, he argues the idea of parents putting spyware on kids’ computer is a good idea to keep the child safe. Many American parents have no idea what happens in cyberspace; sex, bullying, and drugs. Parents are torn between protecting their child with spyware and allowing the child to have privacy. Coben uses his friends’ personal experiences to support his argument without leaving room for counterarguments. By using strong emotional appeals, weak qualifiers, and sugary word choice Coben creates a weak argument that lacks persuasion.
Harlan Coben’s essay “The Undercover Parent” attempts to enlighten readers, specifically parents, of the benefits to installing spyware onto their children’s computers in order to keep record of their child’s online activity. Whilst admitting at first he was not particularly keen on spyware himself, Coben aims to persuade his audience of the benefits by highlighting the dangers of children using the internet unsupervised and without boundaries. However, Coben fails to supply factual evidence to back up his claims, all while stating a number of contradictions within his own arguments.
Online predators, pornography, drug trafficking, piracy, and hate sites are just some of the dangers that a child can face on the internet. The article “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben states that parents should use spyware to monitor their children. Coben argues that parents should be able to know what is in their children’s lives. he believes that spyware can prevent children from being targeted by internet predators on social networking sites and even prevent children from being cyber bullied. I agree with Coben’s claim that parents should consider using spyware as a protection for their teens online. There are many possible dangers facing children on the internet and it is essential that parents install spyware.
In the article “Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben, written March 16th 2008 in the New York Times, Coben states parents should consider putting spyware in their children’s computers and monitoring what their teens are doing on the internet. What is spyware may you ask? Spyware is a software that can be installed on a computer to watch every keystroke someone may make. This allows parents to watch every snapchat, tweet, Instagram post and every conversation your teen ever has over the internet.
In an article titled, “The Undercover Parent”, by Harlan Coben he states that he also agrees with Spyware. One example of this is when he states, “we all know about the young boy unknowingly conversing with a pedophile.” This really stuck to me because it states unknowingly. The kid didn’t know what he was doing. This is an example of why kids need Spyware.
Harlan Coben’s suggestion of spyware has a bunch of advantages and disadvantages. Some parents need to use it, some parents don’t. He claims a lot of positive effects about Spyware, but I do not agree with the most of it. Spyware does help in a lot of ways. It might help us reduce the cases for drugs and cyber-bullying and as well as protecting our personal information, but it’s also our job to avoid sharing our information to strangers online and thinking about our decisions twice. However, whatever precautions we do to avoid the dangers of these kind of situations, the Internet would always be a dangerous place for
Another reason for not censoring the internet is the psychological effects that it can have on a child. The filtering of the internet can tell a child that adults do not trust them to surf the net on their own. This can lead them to believe that they can not make their own decisions, and that a computer determines what right and wr...
...pornography with such ease, parents are going to have to figure out a way to keep their children off these sites. The only other option is coming home and finding them looking at something they shouldn't. Because some children, given the opportunity, are going to seek out these sites, even if you ask them not to. After all, children will be children.
Ever since the internet became a thing in our everyday life parents have been conflicted between allowing their children privacy on the internet or invading that privacy to keep them safe. Parents have the right to monitor their children's activity online because kids don't understand the difference between danger and innocent websites and people and to keep them safe from them.
"That's the moment of growth and you lose that if you monitor them," Shlozman says. Their kid would also act differently if they knew their parent was spying on them. It isn't fair. First, children should not be tracked or spied on because kids parents need to trust their kid and give them respect. Parents need to trust their kid that they will do the right thing and follow the rules.
There are programs available to those parents who feel it is necessary to monitor their childs use of the Internet. Cybersitter can be purchased for around $39.95, and can help to regulate your web browser keeping your childs access to the world wide web restricted. There is even and option in which incoming and outgoing e-mails for inappropriate material.
These individuals feel that it is an invasion of the teenagers’ right to privacy and the development of their trustworthiness. Kay Mathieson states “only by giving children privacy will they come to see their thoughts as something that belongs to them – to which they have an exclusive right.” In the United States and according to the law, monitoring the internet usage of a minor does not break any laws and is a moral obligation of the parent. Trustworthiness is an important development of a child to learn in order to develop genuine relationships with others in the lifetime. “Not only does monitoring have the great potential to undermine the trust of the child in the parent, and thus to undermine trust in others more generally, it also has the potential to undermine the capacity of the child to be worth of trust” (Mathieson). If the parent has not already had conversations with the teenager about monitoring internet usage and the parent is not telling the child about the monitoring, there is already an issue with the development of trustworthiness in the teenager. There was already a failure of development of this skill before the internet or internet monitoring was introduced.
The internet is probably the best invention in the last twenty years but it seems as though teens are taking over. so, will it be okay for parents to monitor their teens internet use. Many agree that yes, it is but many disagree with the topic. The internet can be a useful tool, especially for teens when they would like to enhance their knowledge, but the internet is a huge world with security.
To begin with, while using the internet, children are exposed to different kinds of materials. In most cases, they are exposed to inappropriate ones such as sexually explicit materials and/or violent ones (Magid, 2003). Some children, especially adolescents, are curious about sexuality and sexually explicit material; they can move away from their family and seek fulfillments for their curiosities online. Hence, dangerous situations commonly occur due to the child molesters on the other side of the net waiting to find those children, seduce them, and manipulate them (Freeh, 2008). It is also worth mentioning that other children can be exposed to such resources by accident; they can receive them through e-mail spam or when a popup that contains violent or sexual materials opens in front of them (Magid, 2003). Also, there are some people who attempt to sexually exploit children online. Some of them progressively seduce their targets through the use of attention, affection, kindness, and gifts. They are often willing to devote considerable amounts of time, money, and energy during this course of action. They listen to and empathize with the problems of children. They are aware of the latest music, hobbies, and interests of the youngster. They also attempt to gradually lower children's inhibitions by slowly introducing sexual context and content into their conversations (Freeh, 2008) which can get them to gain the trust of those targeted children and can lead to meet them face-to-face.