Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parallelism in jfk inaugural address
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Parallelism in jfk inaugural address
Parallelism is a very popular choice for presidential inaugural addresses. Obama, Kennedy, and Roosevelt all utilized parallelism when addressing the country at their inaugurations. It is a way to create flow while at the same time incite emotion. Parallelism paired with positive word choice repeatedly left viewers feeling empowered by their new president. Throughout his address, Trump focuses more on short, straight-to-the-point sentences, in contrast to the longer more poetic sentences that other presidents used. While other presidents focused on parallelism and an eloquent rhythm behind their words, Trump allowed himself to stand out by using different syntax in his inaugural address. Trump utilized parallelism very sporadically, while …show more content…
In Obama’s first inaugural address, he utilized parallelism a whopping number of times. He stated, “I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors”(Obama). Immediately, in the first full sentence of his address, Obama draws on the poetic and rhythmic effect of parallelism, by using words such as “humbled,” “grateful,” and “sacrifices” to show he is a man of the people, not there for power, but to help the common man. He continues to do this multiple times throughout his address. Again Obama utilizes parallelism stating, “...we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord”(Obama). Here the parallelism, again creates rhythm, while the words “hope” and “unity” also play to people’s feelings of a new beginning and comfort them. Contrasting Obama’s use of parallelism, but still using positive word choice, Trump states, “We will not fail. Our country will thrive and prosper again”(Trump). The words “thrive” and “prosper” are an attempt to fill the American people with hope and comfort, that Trump will help solve the issues at hand. This combined with the short sentences makes it easy for the audience to understand what Trump is
The purpose of an “inaugural address” is to inform the people of his or her intentions as a leader. Two of the most prominent inaugural addresses throughout history are Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s and Barack Obama’s. Franklin Roosevelt’s inaugural address stands the test of time because it gave the American people hope that they may overcome the terrible Great Depression. Similarly, Barack Obama’s address is well known because it inspired millions that we will be lifted out of economic crisis, but it was also remembered as the first inaugural address from an African American president. The inauguration speeches of Franklin Roosevelt and Barack Obama use the rhetorical devices parallelism, allusions, and emotive language to convey their messages
A major rhetorical choice President Roosevelt incorporated into his moving speech was anaphora. After he explained the country’s relationship with Japan before the attack, and after he explained the devastating results of the attack, he starts to list off in a very structured order the other countries Japan chose to attack, using almost a formulaic approach: “Last night, Japanese forces attacked…” The reason he chooses to repeat the same structured phrases repeatedly is to grab the attention of the audience and to make them feel outraged. It shows who
In this part of the speech, General Douglas MacArthur uses parallelism to arise a dramatically strong feeling from the audience. With Parallelism, he can effectively emphasize his point and to make them more memorable as he go through his speech. To let people to understand how much the soldiers had devoted their life to their loving country and to give tribute to the great American soldiers.
The inaugural speech was structured so that it flowed. There is a lot of comparison and contrast in the first paragraph of the speech. For example “We observe today not a victory of a party but a celebration of freedom—symbolizing an end as well as a beginning—signifying a renewal as well as change.”(Kennedy, 1961) There is also some cause and effect in the paper. I think that this is to be expected because of all the discussions on war. He made it sound like because it was our moral responisibility we should go to war. These are the only two main structures that are used through the entire speech but they are used so well that it is not lacking substance with the lacking of structures.
Parallelism is also used in this speech. Lincoln said “and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” In this case, the repeated grammatical element in the series of three phrases is a prepositional phrase because each phrase begins with a preposition, “of,” “by,” and “for” followed by the object of the preposition “the people”. The effect would have been different if he had used “and that a democracy shall not perish from the earth.”
He implements this emotional appeal into his speech to involve all Americans—people living in the United States of America, regardless of their ethnicity, race, or culture, and to acknowledge that the American people have endured this together, and that they will continue to advance after this event with stronger resolve, stronger than ever. In addition, he implements personification to motivate and empower the American people. “Our nation, this generation, will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future” (Bush, 2001). “This generation”, again a synonym for the American people, with its unwavering resolve, will fight for its freedom persistently. He intimates that the future of America and of democratic freedom is in the hands of the American people; that the American people have the power to control their fate.
President John F Kennedy ran on a political platform during his campaign that focused on calling for stable wages and stable prices to boost the American economy to pull it out of a recession. Once he won the presidency, this view point continued and was implemented within Kennedy’s legislations. The economy was just starting to find its’ way out of the economic slumps when steel companies raised prices in 1962. This rise in prices would damage the US’ economy greatly, reversing the affects of Kennedy’s legislation. The president’s response was holding a news conference in which he questioned the steel companies’ choices to convince them to reverse their choices. Using parallelism, trustworthy sources and statistics, and all the Aristotle’s appeals.
This meant that many of his main points were stated repetitively throughout his oration, which conveyed the importance of what he was saying. One example of how Johnson used parallel structure is when he said, “I speak tonight for the dignity of man and the destiny of democracy.”, in lines 1 and 2. He then says in line 33, “Those words are a promise to every citizen that he shall share in the dignity of man.” He mentions the dignity of man multiple times throughout his speech in order to promote the importance of it. President Johnson also speaks about equality and freedom multiple times, which is another way that he incorporated parallel structure into his eulogy. By repetitively speaking about the same idea, he was able to keep the audience engaged in his ideas. Johnson made it very clear that moving forward, the nation must work together as one. By strategically using parallel structure to gain the audience’s attention, he was able to make his point much more
George Bush uses parallelism in his speech such as “We’ve seen the unfurling of flags, the lighting of candles, the giving of blood, the saying of prayers in English, Hebrew, and Arabic. ”(Bush 1) He wrote this sentence like this because it is more interesting and more effective than saying people gave blood, and people unfurled flags etc. If he would have written his paper like this then the audience or the nation would not have been rallied the Middle Eastern terrorists would have not been
Roosevelt’s speeches utilizes parallel structure to the best of his ability and makes it work in his favor. Lincoln on the other hand does not use parallel structure and his speeches take on a dull tone. When Roosevelt talks about the depression, he uses imagery to help the listeners see into his mind and see what he sees. Lincoln talks mainly about God’s purpose and how the Civil War was sent by God as punishment. When Roosevelt talks about the bombing, his tone laden with sadness and anger, the anger showing when he talks about the bombing and the response they had received from the Japanese one hour after the bombing. Lincoln’s tone in his Gettysburg Address is full of sadness as he talks about the deaths of the men who fought in the war.
“Today we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another, or from one party to another – but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People.” With this statement, Trump had set the tone for his entire speech, and exhibits another of his main points in uniting the American people. “Rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation; an education system, flush with cash, but which leaves our young students deprived of knowledge.” Trump’s use of descriptive language, to create vivid imagery for the audience here is one of the most powerful statements he makes in his speech. The emotional response Trump is able to strike in the listener, and the feelings he creates with his appeals to pathos throughout the speech is a big part of what makes this an effective inaugural
This speech had a lot of positive sides to it, but one of the most important things was that it gave him a good look from the outside. The inaugural address was written to let the citizens of America know that they could change this country for the better. It assured all voters that they voted for a good cause and that their choice would not end badly. We need to repeat this so much that when we hear it again, we have it memorized and we have no doubt about it.
Near the beginning of his speech, Obama declares, speaking of the U.S.A, that “This nation is more than the sum of its parts.” This is a metaphor meaning that the nation forms a stronger combination of people than you would expect by looking at each individual person. He uses this metaphor to explain that an individual will not be able to make much of a difference towards improving America, but if many people work together they can achieve great things and actually make changes that help solve some of the problems our country faces today. A little later in his speech, Obama uses parallelism to speak of his church, “Trinity embodies the black community in its
He makes sure his audience connects with him directly by making them feel at his level, and at hiss. This way he connects to the audience, and in exchange, helps his statement of unity. Using various examples of parallelism, anaphora and refrain, Obama brands the theme of equality and togetherness in our country throughout the speech, vital to gaining the respect of his audience. Obama recalls the ‘enduring strength of the constitution’ by delving into the past alluding to America’s allegiance to the Declaration of Independence by quoting “we hold these truths. that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.
President Obama speaks in different registers throughout the speech--—effectively code switching to reach his different audiences and accomplish his purposes. He begins his speech by quoting the Bible, using that as a springboard into his