Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Celebrities right to privacy
Celebrities right to privacy
Celebrities right to privacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Celebrities right to privacy
When one discovers the phrase "paparazzi," what is their immediate considered? A camera? A flash? My first thoughts are blaring voices, blinding lights, people running to get away, and to put it all in one word, chaos. Paparazzi are freelance photographers that take candid images of celebrities for publication. They are a sinister assembly that are renowned for getting such images by any means possible, if it is by harassment, threatening others, or causing fear. One can see by any celebrities’ reality television show, social media account or from a newscast on the public that celebrities have conveyed worry about the extent to which paparazzi invade their individual space and the filing and obtaining of judicial support for restraining instructions against paparazzi is expanding as are lawsuits with judgments against them. Paparazzi are negative, dangerous people who hide behind the first amendment so they can completely invade ones privacy, ruin ones reputation and turn a life into complete and utter chaos.
To begin with, the paparazzi’s first line of protecting against is nothing unfamiliar in this democratic homeland. “We the people” have a right to understand who these persons are that we contain in high regards. This entitles them to pursue any subject of interest particularly those that are legally regarded to be public numbers. Celebrities naturally are subject to the loophole in the regulation of right of privacy. As many odd laws that there are, the big dangers to the people in this country are not taken care of. Celebrities’ kids are insulted by the photographers. At age six, Suri Cruise is just as photographed as her famous, now divorced parents, Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes. Children at that age are commonly camera ...
... middle of paper ...
...uise and celebrity kids."Examiner. N.p., 15 August. 2012. Web. 15 August. 2012.
Celebrity Health & Fitness, Admin. "Brad Pitt Motorcyle Wreck Latest in Celeb-Paparazzi Crashes (Video)." Celebrity Health & Fitness. N.p., 24 Oct. 2009. Web. 26 Oct. 2009.
Reuters. "Kidman Says Scared of Crash in Paparazzi Car Chase." Canada.com N.p., 20 Nov. 2007. Web. 25 Oct. 2009.
Jordan, Mary. "Paparazzi and Driver Found Negligent in Princess Diana's Death." The Washington Post. N.p., 8 Apr. 2008. Web. 26 Oct. 2009.
Pattinson Online. "Welcome!" Project F.L.A.N.S. Wordpress, 5 July 2009. Web. 14 Dec. 2009.
Thinking of Rob. "Paps: The Fans Fight Back "He Doesn't Want This, Neither Do We"." He Doesn't Want This. Neither Do We. Wordpress, 9 Dec. 2009. Web. 14 Dec. 2009.
Adam. "Lindsay Lohan: The Paparazzi Have Ruined my Life. " ShowbizSpy.com N.p., 24 May. 2012. Web. 24 May. 2012.
As celebrities stand distinctively among the masses and cast out their halos of personality charm and strong suits of skilled abilities, the controversies about them are unavoidable shadows created from their fame. With the popularization of celebrity culture, information synchronization, and communication technology, their lives are publicly exposed and various forms of media (depending on eras) record their flaws. Tough information transmitted to audiences are frequently biased, evidences of objective reality remains, even in the remote past.
MacAskill, Ewen. "Families Rebuke NBC for Broadcast of Killer's Rant." Guardian.co.uk. 20 Apr. 2007. Web. 26 Apr. 2010. .
If there is one individual in the celebrity world that is known for his or her troubled thoughts or misbehavior, there isn’t anyone better to recognize other than Lindsay Lohan. An American star, model, and singer, Lohan was recognized in all different aspects of Hollywood because of her talents as a young actress. However, as her stardom continued to progress, so did the instability in her mental health. The mass media and people alike had an influence on Lohan’s behavior by distorting how she was portrayed on and off the screen. Lohan’s family life also had a huge impact on her turnout because she was constantly around the instability of her family members, thus affecting her mental
The question of paparazzi threatening privacy and First Amendment rights is often to situational to argue in a conventional manner, but certainly there are many facets of the issue which can be addressed in a quite straightforward manner. Celebrities who feel they have the right to privacy in public places often muddy the waters of this issue. Oddly enough, those celebrities who have chosen to speak out against what they feel are violations of their privacy most always begin their campaigns with a large press conference. In other words, they gather together those people they wish to not only suppress but also berate in hopes that these people will use their positions and skills to carry these celebrity's messages to the public. Is often seems that theses celebrities want it "both ways" in that they appreciate coverage when they have a movie, record, or book coming out, but not at any other time.
The media is one of the most powerful tools in people’s lives, since it’s used by many as the medium for the delivery of useful information to diverse audience. Over the past few years, the media landscape has undergone noteworthy developments. Prized information about various cultural groups is often relayed through appropriate media, and it’s interesting to note that blogs are currently being utilized as the best medium for celebrity gossip. Celebrity blogs are usually thronged with readers, who would like to know more about their favorite superstars. The entries of different celebrity gossip blogs are often accompanied by paparazzi photos that are usually meant to trigger a stream of comments based on the readers’ observations, enthusiasm and criticisms.
This ruling served as a wake-up call to the British press and public. According to a recent poll, 43% of the U.K. public hold the photographers responsible for her fatal crash, while only 33% of the country thinks that the chauffeur is equally responsible.Some believe the chauffeur was under the influence and he wasn’t paying attention to the roads. Others theorize Princess Diana provided a tip to the paparazzi about the decoy vehicle. No matter the theory, the public turned against the media after the death of Princess Diana. Most tabloids as well as the British magazine “Sun and the Mirror” began to have their lowest sale figures. Many people who worked at the magazine would not mention to anyone of their line of work for fear of ridicule. The British media was ashamed after what had happened to Princess Diana and distanced themselves from
There has always been a need and a desire to tap into the celebrity lifestyle. The paparazzo is our window into this world. While the paparazzi are important in getting the stunning images of celebrities smiling on the red carpet, they overstep boundaries when they snap images of said persons without makeup as they ask their private houses. Consider the vital issue of paparazzi reform. The job of paparazzi is stressful on the body and mind; being a celebrity with your life broadcasted at every second has similar effects. The physical and mental problems faced by the men and women responsible for the photos are frightening. There is a real privacy issue when talking about the paparazzi. Celebrities lose the luxury of a quiet home when they have a string of photographers outside their homes. Safety is imperative for those in any way involved with the paparazzi. Limitations should be applied to the paparazzi for the safety and sanity of all included.
No matter where a person goes throughout the United States, they will not walk through the streets of New Jersey or New York for long before they hear the latest scandals with Kim Kardashian or Miley Cyrus. If a person walks into any public store they’ll quickly hear discussion of the latest stars on American Idol from passersby. While we scoff at the antics of celebrities, but at the same time we can foster an almost fanatical desire to be as if not more famous then the people everyone talks about. It is rather human to feel envy, jealously, and desire; we all want to be looked favorably upon. We roll our eyes when someone repeatedly states how beautiful or intelligent a celebrity is, yet even a skeptic can’t help but desire the admiration that celebrity received. Why do men work out? Why do women use such extensive amounts of cosmetics? Why are people so determined to be revered? The answer to individual’s thirst for fame can vary but it’s unavoidable to assume that individual wanted to be the center of attention. We want to be admired, favored, and loved as much as the celebrities that we worship. Reality television has shifted to show the “perfect” life of our celebrities and how happy they are compared to the common people. Neoliberals and authoritarian realized how our fanatical love for our celebrities can be used against us as to quote Frank Furedi from his academic journal on the topic of celebrity culture in which he has stated in the abstract in his first page: “Often celebrity provides an alternative source of validation. The tendency to outsource authority to the celebrity represents an attempt to bypass the problem of legitimacy by politicians and other figures.” Through celebrities’ neoliberals and
The deception of media consumers allows for the abuse of economic infrastructures of society. An obsession with celebrities’ lives passifies ordinary people in accepting the stratification of the elite businesses and the ordinary citizens. Though pseudo-events and celebrity worship may not be exactly complementary, the similarities of both leaves the public to be utterly vulnerable unless they begin to critically think for themselves.
The public has been revolutionary to have access into celebrities’ private life thanks to the “paparazzi”. Definitely, celebrities will always be in front of the camera. It comes with the frame. Nevertheless, it does not justify photographing and the lives of people at the expanse of their privacy.
Photographing an individual whether famous or not in public will not violate that person’s privacy under the laws in most countries. Assuming the paparazzi isn’t assaulting someone or trespassing or otherwise doing something illegal while taking such a picture, he or she will not be violating the law. Public figures do not ask for a total invasion of their privitness .Few of us lead lives that are not classified into a newsworthy. Just because these people contribute to their profession in front of the world, it does not mean that they should be denied the right to privacy and respect. Therefore Paparazzi should be banned from exposing people’s private lives, any way they want.
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
But lets focus on a more specific facet of sensationalism. Where do the children of celebrities stand in this issue...
Should celebrities have their right to privacy? Before newspapers, television, and the internet, ordinary people were not exposed to endless stories about celebrities. Today however, we are bombarded with information about who is dating whom, where they eat, and what they wear from magazines such as People, Entertainment Weekly, and Star. Also, most ordinary people respect the rights of others to a private life. However, some people are just obsessed to get information out of celebrities. They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their childrens’ rights to privacy. They are ordinary people just with a famous role in life.
When living their day-to-day lives in the public eye, many celebrities must deal with gossip columnists, the infatuation of stalkers, and the unrelenting paparazzi. They follow celebrities into restaurants, their children’s schools, on vacations, and even their residential neighborhoods (Jones). By seeking out and publishing the whereabouts of celebrities, they cannot be sure who will find or come across that information. The paparazzi ...