Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative effects of trade
Economics eassy
Economics eassy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive and negative effects of trade
As the world develops, the need for money, exploitation and commerce rises and opens many doors for the benefiters that lead them into a whole new universe of unethical, criminal acts that serve their ego. Organ sale is a commercial trade that fits in that position and is considered a part of the black market. As inhuman as trading organs might seem, this act is actually judged in many different ways allowing some sides to argue their point of view by elaborating many benefits resulting from such a trade , and on the other hand , giving the opposite sides the possibility to highlight the immoral activity that is known as the organ trade. Although this type of trafficking is illegal most countries, it doesn’t stop the traffickers from performing the activity in the black market, allowing themselves to benefit financially from the sale of organs (hearts, kidneys, livers...) and victimizing a large number of people. What is organ trade exactly? It is the trade involving inner human organs for organ transplantation. Even though there is a worldwide shortage of organs available for transplantations, the organ trade is still illegal in all the countries except for Iran. The subject of whether or not this act should be considered illegal is debatable and it arises different opinions validated by different justifications. There is no doubt that this commerce of human organs victimizes a large category of people. In fact, the "desperate donors" that pay the price are usually the poor people in developing countries that rely on the sale of their organs as a way of making money to improve their family's economic status. However, selling their organs affects them indirectly as they are normally cheated by the traffi... ... middle of paper ... ...ck Market Organs: Profiteering and Disparities in Global Medicine ,17(1,2),6,7.retreived from : http://cbhd.org/content/medical-exploitation-and-black-market-organs-profiteering-and-disparities-global-medicine Epstein M.(2007).The ethics of poverty and the poverty of ethics: The case of Palestinian prisoners inIsrael seeking, 33,473–474. Retrieved from: http://cofs.org/COFS-Publications/Budiani_and_Delmonico-AJT_April_2008.pdf Annas, G.J. (1984). Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Organ Sales, Hastings Center Report, 14, 22–3. Retrieved from : http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/organs-sale/ Erin, C. and J. Harris, 1994, “A Monopsonistic Market” in Robinson, I. (ed.) The Social Consequences of Life & Death Under High Technology Medicine, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 134–157. Retreived from : http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/respect/
Joanna MacKay says in her essay, Organ Sales Will Save Lives, that “Lives should not be wasted; they should be saved.” Many people probably never think about donating organs, other than filling out the paperwork for their drivers’ license. A reasonable amount of people check ‘yes’ to donate what’s left of their bodies so others may benefit from it or even be able to save a life. On the other hand, what about selling an organ instead of donating one? In MacKay’s essay, she goes more in depth about selling organs.
Yearly, thousands die from not receiving the organs needed to help save their lives; Anthony Gregory raises the question to why organ sales are deemed illegal in his piece “Why legalizing organ sales would help to save lives, end violence”, which was published in The Atlantic in November of 2011. Anthony Gregory has written hundreds of articles for magazines and newspapers, amongst the hundreds of articles is his piece on the selling of organs. Gregory states “Donors of blood, semen, and eggs, and volunteers for medical trials, are often compensated. Why not apply the same principle to organs? (p 451, para 2)”. The preceding quote allows and proposes readers to ponder on the thought of there being an organ
Transplant tourism, as defined by Yosuke Shimazono, is “the practice of travelling abroad to obtain organs through commercial transactions” (955). This new phenomenon has emerged as a global answer to the current organ shortage across the world. Currently, 4,500 people in Canada are waiting for a donor to remedy end-stage organ failure, and only an average of 2,000 will receive and organ this year (Government of Canada). In 2012 alone, 256 Canadian men and women died while on waiting lists for donations, meaning the emergence of practices such as transplant tourism has come as no surprise. Of course, the organ trade market has been hard to expose due to a lack of documentation, but certainly
It is said that “Some agree with Pope John Paul II that the selling of organs is morally wrong and violates “the dignity of the human person” (qtd. In Finkel 26), but this is a belief professed by healthy and affluent individuals” (158). MacKay is using ethos the show the morality of those that believe it is wrong for organ sales. The morals shown are those of people who have yet to experience a situation of needing a new organ. Having a healthy and wealthy lifestyle, they cannot relate to those that have trouble with money and a unhealthy lifestyle as the poor. The poor and the middle class are the ones that suffer being last on the list for a transplant, thus have different ethics. Paying an absurd amount of money and still having to be at the bottom of the list for a transplant, is something no person anywhere in the world should have to
In her article, Satel criticizes the current methods governing organ sharing in the United States, and suggests that the government should encourage organ donation, whether it was by providing financial incentives or other compensatory means to the public. Furthermore, the author briefly suggests that the European “presumed consent” system for organ donation might remedy this shortage of organs if implicated in the States.
Critics of kidney sales argue that impoverished people are more likely to sell their organs than the rich. (Matas, 2004) They claim that the practice of kidney sales is injustice since vulnerable vendors are targeted and that they may suffer from lengthy health problems after the operations which may eventually lead to the loss of jobs. (Bramstedt, 2010)
It is clear that a large demand for organs exists. People in need of organ donations are transferred to an orderly list. Ordinarily, U.S. institutions have an unprofitable system which provides organs through a list of individuals with the highest needs; however, these organs may never come. A list is
Organ donations are crucial for people in emergency situations. For years organ donations have saved the lives of millions. The problem with people needing organs is that there are not enough organs to be supplied to everyone who needs it. There are many people who die because they are not able to obtain lifesaving organs. The need for organs exceeds the supply given. Thus, leading me to ask this essential question, “Should organ donation be a part of the market?” To support this question I have prepared three supportive claims, but since my answer is no my reasons will revolve around this argument. First, I will state why I do not agree with such a thing, and then I will support my claim by stating why it is so bad, and to end my paper I will state what place(s) legalizes trade.
Throughout history physicians have faced numerous ethical dilemmas and as medical knowledge and technology have increased so has the number of these dilemmas. Organ transplants are a subject that many individuals do not think about until they or a family member face the possibility of requiring one. Within clinical ethics the subject of organ transplants and the extent to which an individual should go to obtain one remains highly contentious. Should individuals be allowed to advertise or pay for organs? Society today allows those who can afford to pay for services the ability to obtain whatever they need or want while those who cannot afford to pay do without. By allowing individuals to shop for organs the medical profession’s ethical belief in equal medical care for every individual regardless of their ability to pay for the service is severely violated (Caplan, 2004).
The human body, and the organs being prepped for donation are often objectified, making them a “contested terrain” of sorts. This objectification silences the donor and the donors family, making the donor recipient, and the organ transplant surgeons the stars of the show (Sharp, 2001). In the United States, the human body, and organs being donated are often viewed as goods, or objects, being bought and sold for medical purposes. Almost all parts of the human body can be viewed in this manner. Genetic materials associated with reproduction such as placenta, sperm, and ova can be sold as well (Sharp, 2001). Organ transplant lists are very extensive, with a long list of requirements that must be met by the donor recipient before they can even be put on this list. Because some people can be on this list for many years, there is a strong desire, or desperation, for a life saving organ, that individuals will go through the black market to get
When viewing organ donation from a moral standpoint we come across many different views depending on the ethical theory. The controversy lies between what is the underlying value and what act is right or wrong. Deciding what is best for both parties and acting out of virtue and not selfishness is another debatable belief. Viewing Kant and Utilitarianism theories we can determine what they would have thought on organ donation. Although it seems judicious, there are professionals who seek the attention to be famous and the first to accomplish something. Although we are responsible for ourselves and our children, the motives of a professional can seem genuine when we are in desperate times which in fact are the opposite. When faced with a decision about our or our children’s life and well being we may be a little naïve. The decisions the patients who were essentially guinea pigs for the first transplants and organ donation saw no other options since they were dying anyways. Although these doctors saw this as an opportunity to be the first one to do this and be famous they also helped further our medical technology. The debate is if they did it with all good ethical reasoning. Of course they had to do it on someone and preying upon the sick and dying was their only choice. Therefore we are responsible for our own health but when it is compromised the decisions we make can also be compromised.
In this paper I will be using the normative theory of utilitarianism as the best defensible approach to increase organ donations. Utilitarianism is a theory that seeks to increase the greatest good for the greatest amount of people (Pense2007, 61). The utilitarian theory is the best approach because it maximizes adult organ donations (which are the greater good) so that the number of lives saved would increase along with the quality of life, and also saves money and time.
... making his or her decision to sell as unethical. If there was a rare situation where sellers from all income classes would truly wish to sell their organs without any hesitation or restriction, only then would the principle of autonomy truly provide a reasonable argument for the establishment of an organ market.
... will check to avoid all the risks that might occur. And according to professor Nadey Hakim, he believes that there should be a market for the organs instead of the black market (Smith, 2011). This idea will be lowering the problems of the black market or might even destroy the black market. It will be saving many lives and people will know were to go to get an organ they need that is safe without any consequences.
People consider trafficking to be only in the form of sex, but trafficking actually has many different categories. Human trafficking is defined as people who sell or trade their bodies, or other people’s bodies for different purposes like, forced labor, sex, forced marriage, and even organs. Trafficking of any kind is considered a crime in the United States and every other country in the world except Iran because it is a violation of human rights. Although trafficking is illegal, it still takes place all over the world and statistics say that trafficking brings in approximately 32 billion dollars of international trade per year. Out of all the different forms of trafficking, organ trafficking is the most dangerous. The compensation of organ donors was legal until 1984 when the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 was put into place. Many people turn to buying organs because there is a shortage of organs and some patients may be on the organ transplant list for years. Because there is such a shortage of available organs for transplantation, many people turn to buying or selling organs on the black market illegally. If trafficking was legalized with regulations, there would rarely be a need to use the black market. Even though the 32 billion dollars that the black market makes each year would rapidly diminish, the money would be spent in other places, and legally. Many people argue that a human life should be invaluable but by legalizing the trafficking of organs, the list for organ transplants would slowly disappear. If the sale of organs was legal with heavy regulations, many more organs would be donated; therefore, many more lives would be saved all over the world.