What happens when the United States takes over a country's governments? Overthrow by Stephen Kinzer tells the story of how the United States took over the governments of many unstable countries. The U.S interfered with the governments for the worse and caused the countries too lose total control. The most recent places that the United States took over were Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan and Iraq. The United States caused communities to unravel and people to go into total chaos. The United States thought that overthrowing these countries would lead to success and the citizens would be grateful for all that the U.S did, but quite the opposite occurred. The governments changed for the worse and the U.S had a very negative impact on the citizens …show more content…
as well. As a result of interfering, the United States up to this day suffers from hatred from the people in the communities impacted, meanwhile the communities themselves still suffer from consequences such as loss of stability, and loss of resources as well. First, America for decades was known for thumbling democratic governments that they saw as a national threat by replacing them with dictatorships. The reason why the United States installed dictatorships in places were they saw were a threat, such as Iran and Guatemala is because they knew that if those countries were to gain free speech rights, the people will criticize the United States actions. America has always prevented rights from getting to people in those countries and the method they often used is supporting dictatorships: “The reason was straightforward. When people in countries like Iran, Guatemala, South Vietnam, and Chile were free to speak, many criticized the United States and supported political movements that placed their own national interests a head of those of outside powers” (Kinzer,196). America during that time was faced with its biggest fear, communism. Although the Soviets Union’s main target was Eastern Europe, the U.S. was still nervous about Communism reaching the U.S. mainland or any of its territories or even the neighboring countries and therefore the U.S. tried preventing communism from spreading outside the Soviet Union by replacing democracies with dictatorships that were loyal to the U.S. However, despite their efforts to prevent anti-American riots, many broke out: “Soon after that banquet, angry crowds began surging through the streets of Tehran and other Iranian cities crying “Death to the American shah!” (Kinzer, 202). The American efforts to prevent such riots failed. Americans have always thought that by silencing people by preventing free speech in countries that suffered from the United States actions, the anti-American feelings would disappear. Unfortunately for the U.S. that was not true in countries such as Iran, Guatemala, and South Vietnam that suffered a lot from the United States. Next, the United States helped to create a dysfunctional government when they were just trying to help out countries in need.
The United States tried to help out Afghanistan because they felt that it was their duty to help them out. A man from the United States mentioned “First, Afghanistan’s collapse was partly the result of the devastating war Americans sponsored there during the 1980’s, and it might well be argued that this was gave the United states a moral obligations to help rebuild what it helped destroy” (Kinzer,309). The United States felt that it was their duty to help out Afghanistan after they helped to cause a war prior to the overthrow, however; while the United States thought that they were helping to create a better society in afghanistan, they were actually doing the opposite. The United States was helping to create chaos and terror and it destroyed the political structures that were in the country before. This suggested that while the United States thought that they were helping to repay Afghanistan for the terrible items they had done to them before, they were actually just making everything worse and they were not helping the country out at all. Also, quite the opposite also occurs in a small Caribbean country called Grenada. The United States once again intervened into their government hoping to create something positive there but instead of creating turmoil which is what usually happens, the United States succeeded in helping out the citizens of …show more content…
Grenada. “The invasion of Grenada in 1983 had quite the opposite effect. Of the fourteen countries whose governments the United States has forcibly deposed, Grenada is one of the few in which most citizens were, and have remained, genuinely grateful for intervention” (Kinzer, 302). The country of Grenada was different than all the other countries that the United States had overthrown. In Grenada, the United States was able to help out that country and satisfy the needs of the citizens. The people who lived there were affected positively and showed support for the United States after they had come and overthrown their country. Instead of being enraged with the United States, like many of the other countries, Grenada was able to show gratification for all that the United States did to improve their government. Stability was not the only thing that the countries impacted by the U.S.
lack, the countries also suffered from loss of resources. There has always been economic damages in the countries were the U.S. interfered in or invaded. Before the U.S. invasion, Panama city, the capital of Panama was were people from all around Latin America headed to spend money. The Latin Americans found everything they needed in that city, from clothing to jewelry to kitchen appliances. Within a few hours of the U.S. invasion all of that vanished: “By one estimate, more than $2 billion of merchandise was stolen during these hours. Even a small show of force would have stopped this larcenous frenzy, but American soldiers never appeared” (Kinzer, 306). Panama City shopping centers were completely robbed In a matter of hours by locals. After destroying the public order in Panama City, the United States did not bother to defend their new territory. Instead of interfering and stopping people from completely robbing what was once the shopping center in Latin America. Locals were not the only ones that caused the damage, American soldiers physically also played a huge role in the damage of Panama city: “The other great loss that the American invasion caused was through fires that were set off during the fighting” (Kinzer,306). American soldiers left thousands of people homeless due to their unnecessary and careless shooting, in an area where houses were made out of
wood. The United States was the cause of the overthrow of many different countries all over the world. Even though these countries are all so different, the United States had a very similar impact between them. Almost all these countries suffered dramatically from a severe loss of instability and a growing hatred towards the United States. Grenada was the only country able to escape these consequences and prove that it is possible to become prosperous even with the United States interference. Although the United States has overthrown many countries and changed the fate of many of these for the worse or better, this is not the end. In fact, this is only the beginning as the United States has plans for the overthrowing of more governments in the near future.
Chapter six of Blown to Bits by Hal Abelson, Ken Ledeen, and Harry Lewis focuses on the availability of bits via the internet and how easily they can be stolen. They discuss how companies attempt to combat this issue and potential issues that this can present. Throughout the chapter, the authors contemplate the effects that the internet has had on copyright infringement and legislation surrounding that. They discuss authorized use and rulings surrounding it. The overarching theme of the chapter seems to be that the internet was made to share information, however; in that process, information can be stolen easily, and that issue is not easy to combat.
In the book Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand, young Louie Zamperini is the troublemaker of Torrance, California. After his life had taken a mischievous turn, his older brother, Pete, managed to convert his love of running away, into a passion for running on the track. At first, Louie’s old habit of smoking gets the best of him, and it is very hard for him to compare to the other track athletes. After a few months of training, coached by Pete, Louie begins to break high school records, and became the fastest high school miler in 1934. After much more hard work, goes to the Olympic Games in Berlin in 1936 but is no match for the Finnish runners. He trains hard for the next Olympic Games, and hopes to beat the four minute
Ooka Shohei named the last chapter of Fires on the Plain “In Praise of Transfiguration.” Through the whole novel, readers witness the protagonist Tamura transform from an innocent soldier to a killer. Readers watch him go from condemning the practice of eating human flesh to eating human flesh for his own survival. At the end, Readers see Tamura’s redemption as he shot Nagamatsu who killed and ate his own comrade Yasuda. What was the difference between two men who both killed and ate human beings? To Tamura, the guilt of eating human flesh distinguished himself from Nagamatsu who cold-bloodily killed Yasuda. As Tamura recalled, “I do not remember whether I shot him at that moment. But I do know that I did not eat his flesh; this I should certainly have remembered.” (224) The fact of him shooting at Nagamatsu had no importance to Tamura. However, his emphasis on not eating
In the Earley book, the author started to talk about the history of mental illness in prison. The mentally ill people were commonly kept in local jails, where they were treated worse than animals. State mental hospitals were typically overcrowded and underfunded. Doctors had very little oversight and often abused their authority. Dangerous experimental treatments were often tested on inmates.
America had begun to indulge in the unilateral environment afforded to it during the Cold War. As the Soviet Union began to collapse in the 1980s, the United States was on its way to becoming a solo super power. This acquisition of complete power would inevitably lead the country into new problems, including those foreign and domestic. One of the main issues that came around in the 1980s for the Unites States was the Iran-Contra Affair, which involved the Reagan Administration. With the United States readily inserting influence across the globe, the Iran-Contra Affair proved how foreign intervention can lead to scandal and disgrace in the modern world. Along with detrimental scandals, the Iran-Contra Affair showed how America’s imperialistic behavior in South America was beginning to catch up. In order to remain a dominant influence in South America, the United States had no choice but to topple governments that did not align with American ideology. Using guerillas like the Contras insinuates America’s cornerstone of doing what is necessary in order to satisfy foreign interest.
United States invaded Cuba, Puerto Rico and Philippines not to gain wealth, but for the purpose of getting trades. Americans wanted to project their power to the entire hemisphere and the only way to exercise it is by acquiring republics. Citizens of three countries did not fully acquire the independence they thought they were entitled. Cuba got nominal independence because of Platt Amendment, Puerto Rico became a territory but was not called as citizens of America, and instead they were called Puerto Ricans, while Philippines were denied in statehood. They only had fundamental rights, but United States could govern the country as long as they wanted to. Furthermore, holding the countries from self-government prevent these countries to get the chance to apply what they have learned and adopted from American rule and exercise it for their country’s prosperity.
In the Dominican Republic, the United States intervened by occupying it and making it a protectorate.... ... middle of paper ... ... Furthermore, it was strongly detrimental to Latin America, for the reason that it eliminated the possibility of increasing Latin American exports to the United States, thereby destroying the hopes of Latin American countries focused upon President Nixon’s policy of “trade rather than aid.” During this time, the government justified itself by proclaiming that the United States needed to focus on avoiding involvement and learning from the mistakes made in Vietnam.
Stolen by Lucy Christopher initially takes place in the Bangkok airport, but the majority in the novel takes place in a remote desert in Australia. The main characters are, a 16 year old girl named Gemma Toombs, the protagonist, and 24 year old man, Ty, the antagonist, his real name being Tyler MacFarlane. The novel starts off with Gemma in Bangkok airport, waiting for her next flight. Ty is from Australia and takes her from the airport to Australia. They end up in the middle of the Great Sandy Desert in the Australian outback, where nobody can be found for hours. Tyler then brings her to a house he has built in the middle of that desert, making her stay there.
The Guatemalan Civil War was a 20th century civil war that raged from 1954 until 1996. It has profoundly affected geopolitical relationships in Central America, as well as and US policy toward hostile governments. The war shaped geopolitics in that region and impacted not just Guatemala but the countries vested in the so-called Cold War as a whole. There is disagreement among historians, however, concerning how much US influence guided the outcome of the conflict. Through extensive research, it is clear that the United States of America’s impact on the war was both highly significant and highly detrimental to the US’s geopolitical interests. By studying the evidence, we can establish that the US acted in contrast with its own stated ideals, acting as an indispensible partner in the crimes of the Guatemalan Civil War.
...hat involve the situation but also the people of the country they are dealing with, because they might cut off aid to a country because the leader of the country might be a dictator the people would have to live in poverty. (14) I think this would be the best position because everyone would benefit from the situation. (15)In the Geneva Conference the U.S should have stayed out of Indochina’s business. The Chilean Revolution they United States should have never cut off aid to Chile for the reason being that the citizens of Chile would live in poverty. In the Panama Canal the United States did the right thing because they built it and owned it for several years and then in the year 2000 it passed it to the government of Panama.(16)in conclusion the United States should keep working on being the leading country of the world and not bring anymore problems upon themselves.
Immediately following the war with Spain, the United States had both the political will to pursue imperial policies and the geopolitical circumstances conducive to doing so. But the way in which these policies would manifest was an open question; was the impulse to actively remake the world in America’s Anglo-Saxon image justified? Hence, there were several models of American imperialism at the turn of the twentieth century. In the Philippines, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Samoa, the United States asserted unwavering political control. In Cuba, and later throughout most of the Caribbean basin, the economic and political domination of customarily sovereign governments became the policy. Ultimately, the United States was able to expand its territory
Each year, the United States of America pours billions and billions of dollars into its foreign aid program. We are a rich nation, and also very generous. We are willing to sacrifice American lives to save those of other countries. Doesn't this sound like a nice thing to do? I didn't think so. It is simply a matter of getting our priorities straight, and getting back onto the track of making our country the best it can be; the right track.
Commercialism played the most important role in starting the Spanish American War. The US needed Cuba and the Philippines because they were essential to trade and business. American business had an investment of about $50 million in Cuba and an annual trade stake of about $100 million. Senator Lodge said that whoever has control of Cuba will be able to control the entire Gulf of Mexico, which was important because Cuba was in the direct line of the Panama Canal. The Panama Canal was a key feature to the US Navy, so a base was needed in the Caribbean in order to protect it. A free and independent Cuba would help the US because it could put a naval base there. The overseas market was also important to trade and business with other countries. By getting control of the Philippines, the US would form commercial relations with countries in Asia. Raw materials that originated from Cuba and the Philippines were...
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
Throughout the past 60 to 70 years there has been speculation as to the involvement of the United States in the overthrowing of Jacobo Arbenz’ regime. The United States, through the CIA, although not officially confirmed, did participate in overthrowing Arbenz and his government. It was because of Arbenz’ land reforms, including that of United Fruit Co., that the CIA decided to invade Guatemala. They intervened to prevent Guatemala from falling to Communism by invading her to overthrow Arbenz’ government, which they believed was already following Communistic ideals. The main reason the intervention has been criticized is because it makes it confusing for people to know whether the CIA’s intervention actually helped Guatemala. The CIA’s intervention