Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Public policy ap government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Public policy ap government
Outline the principles of the policy process for improving the health status of communities
Policy is defined as ?a stable, purposive course of action followed by an actor or set of actors in dealing with a problem or matter of concern? (Anderson, J.E. (2003). Public policymaking: An introduction). There are several types of policies, however this discussion will focus on public policy. There are numerous reasons why policies are made and implemented. Public policies are usually developed by government officials and may be influenced by non-governmental actors. The end point of any policy is to achieve results whereas proposed policies can be thought of as propositions that include actions that may be acted upon to achieve specific objectives.
…show more content…
Policies are usually formed in response to some public issue that has been brought forward to the government by citizens, group representatives or legislators. In the setting of a particular health issue this involves identifying and defining the problem in a particular community that needs to be addressed. The second step involved in the policy making process is policy formation. It is at this stage where existing policies if any regarding a particular issue (in this case an issue regarding health status of a community) is examined and is changed. If no policies exist on a particular matter then policies will have to be created. Public officials are usually the ones involved in the policy formulation process. It is important here to define the meaning of policy statements. Policy statements are official expressions of a policy. Policy statements may include legislative statutes, executive orders, administrative guidelines as well as opinions of the court. Policy adoption follows the process of policy formation. It is at this stage where proposed policies that have been made are chosen and subsequently passed to challenge the issue in which the policy was made for in the first place. Policies must also
When the national and local governments have different policy opinions towards an issue, it is hard to formulate a sufficient policy solution. An example of this is when the national and state governments have taken different sides in the issue of marijuana. It is hard to find a solution when the national government finds it illegal, but certain states find it legal.
National legislations provide guidance for local policies and procedures. All policies and procedures are subject to review and must be adjusted/updated accordingly.
Policy in my perspective illustrates as a decision making, planning and or action taken to achieve a certain specific goal within our society. According to Longest B. (2010), his definition stated in his text book states that a policy is defined as ” authoritative decisions made in the legislative, executive, or judicial branches of government that are intended to direct or influence the actions, behaviors, or decisions of others.” In developing a policy, certain steps need to be taken in act to implement the policy. The crucial steps in implementing a policy are: recognizing the problem, agenda setting, formulating the policy, and finally implementing the policy (N.A., 2015).
John Kingdon's policy stream model revolves around a particular policy or agenda. The policy once supported by a policy community becomes a public policy. At a macro level, the basis of Kingdon’s policy model is the description of what is happening in actual current policy development. This model has three separate streams, which represent a window into the politics of modelling policy at macro stages. The model holds that three separate streams - problem, policy, and political streams which all are interlinked, will come together at a decisive moment and then transform into a workable policy. ...
There are two public policies in the United States which is Domestic Policy and Foreign Policy (Public). Domestic Policy are problems defined in our country. This policy usually discusses the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens. Social Policy relates to the issues that affects the welfare of citizens.There are many programs related to Domestic Policy. The welfare programs included in the United States are the social insurance programs. Public Health Policy focuses on the populations health and promotes and protects the health populations. The education policy is based on the education of citizens. The education policy is traditionally the primary and secondary education. The environmental policy focuses on regulating the actions citizens interact in the environment. The criminal justice policy was focused on law and order. Economic Policy attempts to create and maintain a strong economy in the United States (Public). Foreign Policy is strategic plan of the government in dealing with other countries. Foreign policy is involved in several activities such as: diplomacy, defense policy, and intelligence. Diplomacy manages the relations between the foreign countries through negations, treaties and foreign aids. The defense policy provided the international security of the country through the military power. Having intelligence gathers information
The main negative side effect for the policy proposals is the risk that the changes are slight and have no real weight for producing a successful turn around in our system. Furthermore, if the public doesn’t support the policies or get on board, then the success will be
Because state and local public health programs are often funded at least in part with Federal dollars, accountability is often a key issue (“Ten Essential Public Health Services.” 2015). Public health programs therefore document progress towards positive change in health behavior or health status indicators (“Ten Essential Public Health Services.” 2015). Data such as these can be presented to policymakers to document the value or effectiveness of a program (“Ten Essential Public Health Services.” 2015). Those data can also be used for continued program planning and modification (“Ten Essential Public Health Services.” 2015). Policies have positive or negative influences on health. Examples of health policies include safety standards, which influence the incidence of injuries; tobacco regulations affect personal health; and safe city parks can affect the ability for people are active (California Department of Public Health “Strategic Plan”, 2013). It is a systematic process to utilize appropriate data, develop and track measurable health objectives, establish strategies and actions to guide the targeted improvements (California Department of Public Health “Strategic Plan”, 2013). The targeted strategies may be laws, codes, regulations and/or
Policies taken by the respective Governments of each and every country in the world are an important aspect of our life whether we choose it or not. Policies are normally adopted to solve major problems faced by the public. It is the duty of the State to see to it that the problems are solved keeping the majority and at the same time ensuring proper justice is done and ethically on the right side of it. So, it is important that there be a public policy and it matters that they need to cater to the majority and aid them by providing solutions to their problems and ensure a smooth functioning of the state. And as a citizen of the nation, public policy matters to me because it provides me a platform to assess the decisions taken by the state on behalf of the nation and with proper knowledge people like us can aid in the betterment of the society by providing inputs or question the policy if it seems improbable.
Further explanations regarding the relationship between health and other social determinants are also stated (WHO, 2010). Thus, in my opinion, in the policymaking process, collaboration among the different government sectors should be enhanced to address the social determinants of health and to minimize the health inequities. Moreover, it was also suggested by Kaplan and Anderson (1990) that health policy models should integrate different health dimensions and their interactions in the community and emphasize the factors that influence health outcomes in society. In this way, policymakers can develop more holistic interventions to lessen the health disparities within the community. In addition to the involvement of different government sectors, I believe evidence research can help to carry out policymaking processes.
The five principles of HP include building healthy public policy, creating supportive environments, strengthening community action, developing personal skills, and reorienting health services (McMurray & Clendon 2015). The first principle aims to incorporate health into all public policy decisions beyond the health system so that living and working conditions become conducive to health and equity (Germov, Freij & Richmond 2015). According to McMurray & Clendon (2015), multi-sectoral collaboration is required among different sectors, such as education, industry and social welfare, with the reciprocally influential policies that guide the community health. The second principle emphasises the socio-ecological approach to health that promotes sustainable environment and broader social support systems that encourage a safe and satisfying life (Germov, Freij & Richmond 2015; McMurray & Clendon 2015). This principle requires to acknowledge the significance of conserving the physical or social resources that allow people to maintain health (McMurray & Clendon 2015). The third principle focuses on information and learning opportunities that enable communities to make knowledgeable choices for better health (McMurray & Clendon
This is whereby the public’s opinion about a public policy is inquired or considered. In the case that the public policy was sound and valid, a rejection by the public might cause it to appear differently. Some changes might be done to achieve public support but in the real sense, this might completely alter the intended purpose of the public policy. Another non-statutory variable causing a derailment is the commitment of the officials involved in the implementation of a public policy (Nilsen, P. (2015).. In the case that a public policy is valid and sound, non commitment from the officials might completely change this.
The majority of policy studies assume that, once a policy has been formulated, it will be implemented. This is not unreasonable, after all. The scholars who analyze policies and build models of the policy processes do base their work on the assumption that the policy will be implemented, exactly as it is. Furthermore, this assumption extends to another: that the desired results of the policy will be close, at least, to those expected by the policy makers. It should be noted that this assumption is shared by many common citizens. As Thomas R. Dye said in 1972, “We assume that when Congress adopts a policy and appropriates money for it, and when the executive branch organizes a program, hires people, spends money, and carries out activities designed to implement the policy, the effects of the policy will be felt by society and the effects will be those intended by the policy.”
Beitsch et al. (2006) also conveys the main functions of state public health institutions, which include the assessment of diseases, policy development, and the commitment to health protection and promotion activities. While Brumback and Malecki (1996) reveal that the role of public health agencies is to assess and analyse public health problems, form policies, layout development, and implement
Public Managers have to participate in the policy making process. Previously, according to scholars, “policy process” was considered “decision making” (Wu, Ramesh, Howlett, & Fritzen, 2010). Under such pretense, public managers considered their role merely with policy implementation. However the recent theories that define public policy, have demarcated public policy as an activity that involves a broad range of activities ranging from defining problems, ensuring the defined problems to make it to agenda, developing alternative solutions of addressing these issues, implementing the results and evaluating the outcomes.
To reiterate these six components, which are innovation, technical package, communication, management, and political commitment – the community is hand in hand associated with core functions of Public Health. In Public Health the three main core functions are assessment, policy development, and assurance. Assessment is a tool that helps monitors different health and environmental statutes to create, deploy, and identify solutions. It also used a diagnostic tool to investigate health-related problems and different health hazards. Policy development is an act of informing and educating those developed ideas and topics that help the communities and different organizations in their health care efforts. Lastly, assurance utilizes different laws and regulations to help in the aid of protecting the public or environment at risk. It also re-evaluates the laws and regulations to see its effectiveness and its quality (Schneider,