Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How did new technology affect warfare
Essay on how military technology changed warfare
The role of international trade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How did new technology affect warfare
Our Explotation of Technology
Human technology is developed to serve a purpose and this reason often is dependent on what needs a particular society has. In the case of war and in other aspects of culture, technology is developed for a particular reason, such as to defeat the declared enemy. This connection serves to influence the type of inventions developed.
Ehrlich notes that in World War II during the battle at Midway Island in 1942, there was a difference in capabilities between the Americans and the Japanese. While it would be apparent that there was a direct correlation between the readiness of resources and success in battle this connection turned out not to be true. In reality, planning, expertise, and chance were more of a determinant (Ehrlich, 2000). This result shows that technical knowledge is not sufficient to be successful but usage of available resources is necessary to ensure gains. This combination underscores the need for culture to move technology forward. A new invention without cultural demand would not serve much benefit since it would not be used to improve society. However, a cultural need can lead to the development of an invention since the demand moves the technology to an outcome.
Trade provides a primary method of connecting technology to the world. Initially trade was exchanged as items of barter. Cattle, shells, crops, salt, and other items served as a means of providing a fair exchange of goods between parties. The invention of currency has much to do with the needs of trade. It is impractical to ferry a heard a cattle to a place of sale in order to buy the good. However money is more portable than livestock and many other items of barter and helped ease the trade process (Ehrlich, 2000). The importance of trade to culture led to a streamlined process with the invention of currency. While items of barter have value that is tangible, such as food produced by crops, modern currency is only valued by the culture since a government body guarantees it. As a result of the governmental backing, currency can be used a meaningful method of exchanging value. Money that does not contain precious metals is simply a symbolic way of representing value. A culture recognizes the currency as representing value and can be used as an effective accounting system for trade. Additionally, the influence from the cultural value of trade translates into placing less significance on the intrinsic value of the currency itself and instead considers what convenience the technology can provide to improve trade.
Advancements in technology and science contributed to one of the most gory and bloodiest wars in the annals of human existence. These new technological advancements revolutionized how people regarded war. War was no longer where the opposite forces fought in a coordinated battle. War evolved into a game of cunning strategy where the side with the bigger, more powerful, and smarter toys played better. This led to a fierce competition where each side tried to create the smarter machines and better weapons, leading to deadly mass killing weapons in the process.
How did the RCI come to decide which dog breeds were considered “dangerous” and therefore banned? According to the FAQs of the pet policy, RCI “evaluated input from current residents, past experience with animals in residential developments (both on-post and off), and the effect on the Projects’ ability to obtain and maintain adequate liability insurance at a reasonable price” (“Frequently Asked Questions“). In other words, pure anecdotal evidence. No scientific tests or studies of any kind. In fact researching dog bite fatalities involving military children from 2007 to 2010, none of those children were bitten by Doberman Pinschers (“Dog Bite Fatalities…”). Furthermore, in a study done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which covered...
Analyzing the transfer of technology from one place to another can be a very difficult task. People have tried to trace the origins of specific technologies and map out what cultures it affected, why and what impact the technology had on history. Books have been written on conclusions that authors have made after doing the research I have suggested. I believe that obtaining the information to write a book about this subject is extremely hard and confusing, this is a personal assumption that I have made with regard to the fact that reading a book on this subject is hard and confusing. After reading The Tools of Empire by Daniel R. Headrick and excerpts from both Technology in World Civilization by A. Pacey and Major Problems in the History of American Technology, I have formed some opinions of my own primarily based on my readings about nineteenth and twentieth century technology transfer.
The most significant minority states in the Unified Countries are Christians, while the French minorities are mainly Muslims (Koopmans & Ruud 2010 pg. 19). The American minorities share basic values with the reset country while French minorities tend to have alien values, to thinking themselves as a new nation.in the United States, there are no accurate figures of the population on religious affiliation in French.in French at all circumstances, laws prohibit census along religious lines. Surveys do exist even of foreigners but widely vary in results scope and methodology. Two third of Muslims in French live in the main town regions this is according to the interior ministry. The birth rates for is four to three times higher than the birth rates for the non-Muslims. Due to the immigration the working class Muslims were able to mingle with the nation Muslims. The immigrant’s incoming as single males intermarried with the non-Muslim females. Some of the American visitors to Paris and other French cities, saw that how the international mode of lifespan resembled that in U.S as
It seems since that dawn of the era of man we have always been in competition with one another. We have fought countless wars over every issue imaginable, with many great civilizations being founded and destroyed by war. Though with each new conflict comes newer and better technology. Technology is what drives civilizations forward, but it can also lead to its downfall. It is fascinating see how much technology has evolved over history, and how we have incorporated these innovations into newer technology. In past century technology has seen its greatest leap forward. This is in large part due to the two major World Wars that plagued the early part of the 20th century. (Koch p.122)
In the most recent edition of, The Economist, Robert D. Kaplan essay ends with the following statement: “Europe must now find some other way to dynamically incorporate the world of Islam without diluting its devotion to the rule-of-law based system . . . in which individual rights and agency are uppermost in a hierarchy of needs. If it [Islam] cannot evolve in the direction of universal values, there will be only the dementia of ideologies and coarse nationalisms to fill the void.” This essay will explain Kaplan 's views in regards to Islam and Muslim integration, additionally about the rise of far-Right and far-Left political developments. However, I will concentrate on Islam. Moreover, I will explore why it 's trying for
The effect of human travel has been twofold on the course of human history. It has served to transfer technologies, and it has also served to facilitate the spread diseases. There are examples of how technology travels from one culture to another all over the place, from the readings and movies we watch to things that we surround ourselves with everyday. Most of these technologies serve to make the lives of humans easier or more fun, but there are some inventions that have served to only destroy or make others lives worse. In some cases the technology’s originally intended usage was preserved, but in others the technology is used in different manners. An example from one of the first readings from this class is the Chinese invention of gunpowder. Originally it was used for religious purposes, but once the technology spread west through human travel, Europeans used the gunpowder and invented guns and ammunition. Once guns were invented, though, their use has not been altered. Though there are many different models, and types of guns, they all operate under the same principles and for the same purpose.
When watching the film, Star Wars, it is impossible not to be aware of the technology that is represented in the film, partly because it is so much more advanced than our own is now, but also because we can imagine how we might someday acquire such technology. The central theme in Star Wars is good versus evil, clearly demonstrated by the technology in the film. While the Rebels (the good guys) use technology primarily to fight for freedom and quality of life for all, the Empire (the bad guys) use technology to develop weapons of destruction and war in an attempt to rule the galaxy. In addition to these two opposing sides, there is another group that doesn’t use technology for war. This group gets technology as it filters down from the other two groups at war. Consequently, in the film technology is used for good, for bad, and for everyday use. This mirrors our own society in many ways, and therefore, Star Wars is a great artifact to study to get a better understanding of our own technological advancements. In this report, we focus specifically on how the Empire, the Rebels, and the Non-Warring people of the film acquired, developed, and used technology and how that relates to our society today.
Winston presents two approaches to cultural determinism. The first is Cultural Determinist Account A which “implies an examination of the circumstances into which the technology is introduced and diffused through society.” (Winston 791) This account resists the idea of invention and what will happen instantly. This account also focuses on economics, a social factor. The second account Winston discusses is Cultural Determinist Account B, his ultimate position between the accounts, which attempts to bring together all the social elements and insist that it was that combination that led to the creation of a given technology. This account looks at economics, gender, politics, science, race, class etc. This account has much more substance and is “thicker” (Winston 794) than Account A because it examines science/scientists and technology/inventors which make this account contain some aspects of technological
Advancement in Technology 1.1 Introduction Humanity or Mankind has evolved from the essence that separates humans from beasts: the ability to use the mind for reason. Reason is the ability to analyse, create, deduce, and formulate. It is this reason that enables human beings to strive to invent; it is through invention that mankind has developed society and created a better world. We could say that technology is the sum total of instrumentally useful culturally-transmissible information. Technology, a word with Greek origins, is defined as, “the practical application of knowledge especially in a particular area” Technology is a word used to collectively describe or portray the advancements, abilities, creations, undertakings, views, and knowledge of a singular group of persons: we as human-kind.
Technology is crucial in influencing society, therefore it is imperative to understand what influences technological development and how it changes society, such as social shaping and theories of technological determinism. Langdon Winner supports the social determination of technology through the findings of others and his theories of politically influenced technologies, thus Winner accounts for technological determinism through defining the theory in this context.
Currency or money as we know it is what we make as a country to have something in hand to purchase commodities and services. “Money, in some form, has been part of human history for at least the last 3,000 years.” (Beattie, 2015) In the days of old we used the barter system, cattle,
People nowadays are no longer aware of the history of money since at their thought, the value of money is more important than some historical story of its first existence. According to most philosophers, money is a physical medium of exchange that involving a development of carrying out transactions or a unit of measurement and a storehouse for wealth. In other words, money is a clearly identifiable object of value that commonly acknowledge as payment for goods and services given. It also can be used as repayment of debts among business or people as long it’s legally within a country. Back then when the term of money is not been introduced, people has used livestock or anything that directly useful for themselves as a medium of exchange. Money
Medium of exchange in modern economies can be defined as currency. Money performing an important function in the society, people uses money to buy and sell goods exchange for money (Money functions, 2014). Money make transaction become easier, without money, transaction have to be conducted using the barter system. Barter system will only happened in double coincidence of wants, which mean without coincidence of wants between the parties, the trades would be successful. Barter system can be defines as a method of exchanging goods or services without using the money. Everyone is willing to accept money in payment for goods and services. Medium of exchange will make trades become more efficient and traders can spend more time doing production.
“Technology” was a tool that made humans to the top of the food chain, a tool that allowed us to move from backdoor farming to large industrial factories, a tool that allowed to us live on every continent on the Earth and even explore Space, yet nobody ever asked “isn’t it just too much for a simple “tool” to accomplish”? Is it our human knowledge that lies within this tool and is the key factor behind the acquired results? To explore the etymological connection between the technology and knowledge generated through it, the question of “what we refer to and call as technology” has to be answered first. After the point of interest is defined and clearly stated, we will descend and examine technologies connection to the acquired knowledge through the prism of history and natural sciences.