Oryx And Crake Analysis

1158 Words3 Pages

In Oryx and Crake, Atwood indicates that the nature of relationships formed are superficial, as the love mentioned above is absent, and instead, sex is glorified. The pervasive commodification allows Jimmy and Crake to watch disturbing and violent films and pornography. They take advantage of this corporate distribution of depraved content and “the two of them…[watch] porn in Crake’s room” on sites such as “Tart of the Day”, “Superswallowers”, and “HottTotts” (Atwood, Oryx and Crake 89). Jimmy’s and Crake’s friendship is based of the absence and degradation of humanity—they find no wrong in child sex workers— rather than humanity and honest connection as they take pleasure in the commodification rather than the emotions related to sex. Jimmy …show more content…

Love is thought to be a waste, “not the point” in both the societies Oryx and Crake and The Handmaid's Tale, and Atwood, in her criticism of the declining importance of love, focuses on the importance of human relationships and the misplaced elevation of sex. In Oryx and Crake, these human bonds have been significantly made shallower, with Crake’s school, Watson and Crick, even eliminating romance, and encouraging commercial sex (prostitution) over human relationships. Similarly in The Handmaid’s Tale, Offred says, “Nobody dies from lack of sex. It's lack of love we die from”, indicating a loss of love in the Gileadean society even though sex is actively encouraged—it is a technical, methodical means of reproduction and loses all other meaning (Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale 103). Offred’s use of death specifically is interesting to view— she, as well as Atwood in extension, view love as crucial to survival—a “lack of love” leading to death. Sex is often seen as equatable to love, Atwood makes distinct definitions between the two through turning sex into a consumption rather than an emotion. In an interview she indicates, “[sex is] one of those profoundly meaningful human activities which can be very multifaceted and resonant” (Brans, Atwood 303). In both the novels, love is actively eliminated—through scientific superiority (the Crakers) and the …show more content…

The Handmaid’s Tale, which was published in 1985 (18 years before Oryx and Crake), echoes the "political situation of North America, especially the US[:] … in order to promote its imperialistic cause, the Gileadean regime attempts to control natural process— and indeed the course of human nature itself” (Hengen 155). The United States in the late 1900s was highly nationalistic, and there was a push to spread American ideals to the rest of the world; these same ideas of imperialism and nationalism are present in the formation of Gilead. The Handmaid’s Tale, discusses the extreme nationalism of those decades— with the Reagan presidency, the US influence in ending the Cold War, and the deterioration of the Soviet Union—Americans were proud of their country and its “correct” ideals of democracy and capitalism. Atwood exaggerates on these beliefs to create Gilead, where the “correct” beliefs dominate life, leaving no room for emotions. This same idea is applicable to “The Settlers” (published in 1966); the imagery of the settlers invading the land and destroying the natives is reminiscent of the Vietnam War—which dominated most of the 1960s. The United States was determined to push its ideals onto Vietnam, “defining” the land, much like

Open Document