Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social class in medieval times
Monarchy in the french revolution
Monarchy in the french revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Populations can endure a lot from others and become used to it as Michel Foucault said “there are forms of oppression and domination which become invisible-the new normal”. As long as there is something that is offered to them in exchange for the oppression, many will be willing to go along and make the sacrifices necessary. Oppression is more than believing one person is less than another. It is using fear of acceptance and the loss of their own life against someone to get them to agree to something. This can be seen in during many points in history. In the Palace of Versailles, those who were oppressed financially were promised to be accepted into Louis XIV’s daily life. The Indigenous of Canada were promised education for their children in the residential schools, but they instead were forced to …show more content…
assimilate to the Euro-Canadian culture.
And more recently, the people of New York and the world are now more prepared for an attack on public safety because of the terrorist attack on the World’s Trade Center. Each of these events sees people using tools against a group to become oppressed.
The expenses of Versailles created oppression on the people of France financially. Life at Versailles was designed to keep France above all of the other European powers by showing off their wealth. "As king of France [Louis XIV] was the embodiment of France — and his palace was meant to display the wealth and power of his nation" (Jarus, 2018). This meant that Versailles was as lavish as possible, Louis incorporated his father's small hunting lodge into the palace and added both a north and a south wing, along with nearby buildings that housed ministries. Versailles contained many gardens, statues,
and paintings. However, in order to pay for the many lavishes that Louis XIV desired, Louis XIV constantly raised the taxes. It wasn't only those who paid taxes that were affected by Versailles expensive nature. During Louis XIV many events it was seen as rude to not be dressed in something different at each event. It was also against the dress code of these events to not be wearing French maid clothes. This caused even the wealthiest of those at Versailles to become indebted to the King. It was almost impossible to repay what you had borrowed from the state because the high interest rates that was imposed. The reason that those at Versailles could not return to their lives before they joined the court was because they had sacrificed so much already to become a part of the King's daily life. To be a part of Louis XIV's life was to be strived for at Versailles and it was to be obtained no matter how much it costs. Therefore, Louis' plan to keep the poor poor and to stop the nobles from trying to overtake him by using their want to be included, oppressed the French population financially. Residential schools in Canada used assimilation to oppress the indigenous people. From the late 19th century to the mid-twentieth century, Indigenous children were sent to "government-sponsored religious schools established to assimilate ... into Euro-Canadian culture" (Miller, 2018). These schools were created to educate and integrate these children into society so the indigenous communities could learn to be economically self-sufficient and could religiously convert to Christianity. Daily life at the schools consisted of a half-day of being in class and the other at work. Although it was thought that this schedule was to teach the kids skills to earn a living as an adult, the work they did help run the school with minimal expenses. The education they received did nothing to help them because it was only delivered in English or French; neither language was widely spoken by Indigenous people. Not only did the students face poor education, they also received poor meals, many of which were eaten quickly. To add to the low quality diet, clothing was also inadequate. Often ill-fitting and not suited for Canada's cold climates. To add to the misery, many kids were abused; ripped away from their families, separated from their sibling, and forbidden from speaking their first language. Florence Horassi and her brother were separated upon arrival to a residential school where her brother "was just holding onto [her] hand so tight. And then the priest came, and he told [her] he's got to go this way, and then the sister came over to [her], told [her] you got to go this way, but he wouldn't let go of [her] hand. They broke [their] hands apart like that." According to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, at least 3,200 Indigenous children died in the residential schools.The hardships these children faced were put in their lives to make them assimilate the Canadian society and eliminate the indigenous culture that they grew up with. By being so oppressive on such young children, their only choices were to follow along with what they were told or try and escape. But many of those who tries the latter risked their lives in the process. So the government’s attempt to oppress the indigenous community by suppressing the influence the culture had the their youth caused great distress in the children and community that they are still recovering from. Acts of terrorism create fear among the public, which in turn create a sense of oppression. This is seen in the aftermath of the attack on the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001. A survey done a year after the attack found that “The level of public concern was significantly higher on all measures among New York City and Long Island residents (downstate) compared to the rest of the state” (Boscarino , 2018). During the attack, many were killed, “Either they would have been burned or smothered by smoke as the inferno swept through the building, or they would have been forced by the unbearable heat to jump, or else perished as the tower collapsed” (Cooper, 2002). Those who survive to tell of the horrors they endured during the almost 2 hours between the first plane and the second tower collapse. As we learned about the fear these people faced at the moment, the population of the world becomes fearful for their life on the daily. This is what the terrorists want, for the population to always be looking twice and on edge. This creates oppression because people can no longer enjoy their life as they want, many live it as if their live could be changed at any moment. But the terrorists not only create an overall oppressive, but those who have been affected by acts of terrorism and survived must completely change their lives because of how their experiences have affected them. Because of the fear and how people have changed their lives in the aftermath of the attack of the World’s Trade Center, an oppression was created by the terrorists. The many different tools people use to create fear and oppression in the world is limitless. Oppression occurs in many forms such as a fear for acceptance, financially, loss of a culture, or fear for one’s own life. The world must realize that oppression happens and has been happening throughout history because of the many forms it take. Many times the oppression is not blatant and one sided, it often offers something in return or could make an empty promise.
One of the most notable of which would be his decision to completely reconstruct a new palace at Versailles. Such a great expenditure is blatantly criticized in Doc 7 where the Duc de Saint-Simon states, “the foundations and groves have buried more money than could ever appear”. Such expenditures, undoubtedly funded by taxpayer dollars expose Louis’ extremely self-serving distribution of funds when it came to matters of his own comfort. However, it is important to realize that Doc 7, written by a noble, must also be read with a watchful eye. The Duc de Saint-Simon’s assertions could possibly, though construction of a new palace would likely cost a tremendous amount of capital, be riddled by bias as a result of the absolutist King’s extreme suppression of nobility perks and privileges. The idea that Louis acted in his own interest in terms of capital distribution may be explained away by such bias had it not been for the evidence presented in Doc 4. Though on the surface it seems to show the public’s appreciation for the King, one must acknowledge the fact that an ‘inscription on a ceremonial arch of great architectural importance in Tournai’ was most likely commissioned by the King, and again funded by taxpayer dollars. Such a commission would expose the fact that the words stated in the inscription is not the point of view of the French people, but rather the desired
While England lost its power to the nobles, France was able to control them .Instead of having the live among the peasants and the middle class, Louis XIV built the Palace of Versailles in order to force the nobles to be near the king to make sure that they were unable to create conflict with the will of the monarch. This way, the nobles no longer were the people that the middle class would run to when they had a
King Louis XIV was a showy and self-absorbed king. His palace was representative of his personality and ideals. The Versailles palace architecture displayed Louis XIV ideals of secular issues. He cared more about spending money to show off his power. Unlike the Escorial, Versailles was centered on “The Sun King” instead of religion. At one point Louis XIV stated that “he was the state”. This statement was saying that Louis XIV represented the center and best of France. An example of this was that King Louis XIV lived in the middle of Versailles. Versailles was also very ornate and had the atmosphere of freeness. However, the Escorial was very basic like Philip II.
Louis XIV of France used his grand and gaudy Palace of Versailles as a “pleasure prison” for the nobles while Peter the Great sent all of his nobles to St. Petersburg – both of these actions made it difficult for nobles to rebel. In France, Louis XIV ridiculed the nobility by sending them to the Palace of Versailles and busying them with silly little jobs and knit-picky rituals. He gave them these useless jobs to prevent them from ban...
In response to a protest at the McCormick Harvester factory in Chicago where the police reportedly killed six workers, local radicals led by Albert Parsons organized a meeting at Haymarket Square in downtown Chicago. Several thousand showed up to hear the speakers. The speakers were very careful to not incite violence in the already agitated crowd. After the speeches had been given large numbers of people left, however those who remained behind would be forever remembered in our history books. An army of police descended on the crowd and gave them an order to disperse. During the confusion, an unknown person threw a bomb into the crowd of police, killing one officer. Police began to fire on the crowd; the agitated strikers retaliated with a hail of bullets as well. A riot broke out in which one worker was killed and twelve were wounded, one policeman wa...
One of the most important elements of Versailles that affected Louis XIV’s reign was the use of propaganda. The Palace contained “paintings, statues, tapestries” (Page) and a general grandness that significantly promoted Louis’ name. Louis himself was a “prominent subject in the artwork” (Montclos 330) and was portrayed as handsome and god-like. Even in the aspects of the Palace where Louis wasn’t literally being represented, the grand nature of Versailles sent out a message that the King was living lavishly, and was therefore very powerful. Louis XIV used the grandiosity of his Palace and the art inside to promote himself to his people.
"Oppression can only survive through silence" said Carmen de Monteflores and history proved this concept most thoroughly. However, the oppressed groups are generally not silent at all. They revolt, get violent, and are repressed again. This is not a rule, just a simple generalization and, of course, there are numerous exceptions. There is always a possibility that these downtrodden factions will get together to form a strong opposing force that will be an equal or almost equal rival to those that oppress.
Throughout the history there have been nations that have stood up to this injustice and others who have remained silent, leading to the genocide of a whole nation. If the people in the nation of the oppressed would have stood up to the injustice, it would have encouraged others to do so as well and this could have made the tormentors be brought down thus, bringing peace to the people of the nation. If everyone has this type of attitude that they know their voice counts, then the world would not be a place that tolerates oppression, but a world that welcomes freedom.
Versailles was a symbol of absolute monarchism. It was cut off, elaborate and expensive. An example of how cut off Louis XVI was from the rest of France is that he made a single excursion into provincial France and that was a trip to Cherbourg. Politicians these days cannot be seen to be cut off from the outside world and elitist. It is resented by the people. It may have been less resented in the 18th Century but there will always have been a few grumbles coming from certain factions relating to this. As already stated Versailles was expensive to run. People do not mind an expensive home for their King, President or Prime Minister if all is going well in their own country economically. However, as already shown France was not and people were living in desperation outside of Versailles. The vast inequalities between Versailles and provincial France were huge and in times of economic trouble. People become questionable about their leaders living in splendour when they are in
Following the 9/11 attacks, the United States came together with a staunch promise to “never forget” that day’s atrocities. Congressmen from opposing parties reached across the aisle and stood arm in arm at the Capitol to show their commitment to this pledge. But,when another terrorist attack had stunned New York City a century earlier, this promise did not exist. In 1920, a bombing on Wall Street rattled the city’s financial core and earned the title as the city’s worst terrorist attack until 2001. The assault came merely two years after the US debuted as a global superpower with World War 1’s end. Despite the attack on this newfound American identity, the bombing never found closure for proving for the first time that the US was not invincible.
Until September 11, 2001 public security was not very hard to bypass. On this horrific day in history not only was the United States shaken, but also every country in the world surrounding it. Airport security had failed the nation and had hence led to the event, which is now known as the “9/11 terrorist attacks.” Four planes had been hijacked the morning of the attacks with the first plane hitting the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Next came the second plane into the South Tower. The third plane then hit the western face of the Pentagon. Finally, the fourth plane landed in a field in Pennsylvania, but it was originally targeted for the White House (Kean). As a result of this event, airport security around the world has been tightened. America was targeted in retaliation of America’s support to Israel throughout the Persian Gulf War. This group was also known as al Qaeda (“9/11 attacks”). By studying the causes and effects of 9/11 people can be more aware of their surrounding and feel much more safe.
The glare of the sun blazed over France for seven decades during the most elaborate rule in European history. King Louis XIV was the sovereign king of France at age four, born on September, 5th 1638. His reign lasted longer than any other monarchy in history from 1643-1715. He was the god given child to his mother Queen Anne of Austria. She held the title Regency during her son’s younger years. France was in a total eclipse state politically with nineteen million subjects and a weak financial situation. The sovereign suffered from neglect from his mother, she allowed servants to raise and see to the day to day needs of his majesty. During an outing he nearly drowned due to a lack of supervision. Although evidence shows strong neglect his mother
An Analysis of the Absolute Monarchy of France in the 17th Century This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty
Racialization of Poverty becomes concentrated among racialized group such as the Indigenous and inevitably it is socially constructed. In addition, “ colonization is the word most often used to describe the experience of Indigenous encounters with Settler societies.” In country like Canada, colonialism is the domination over Indigenous People by European colonizers and constructing that they are inferior. Furthermore, “ colonialism is the act of claiming sovereignty over the lands and resources of subject people.”(Burger, 2013) This manifests that the aboriginal are being targeted and they experienced terrible violence in the fight of natural resources, lack of power, and suppression with the states. Indeed, The more white settlers occupy, the more marginalized with the indigenous people. Comparing to the first nation, a white settler society continues to be structured by a racial hierarchy. Race and identity is interrelated among groups peculiarly like the First Nation. Most of the indigenous people still live a society which they are separate to the rest, but self- determination is rather essential. After huge assimilation, even though they are not self- governing, self- determination such as “ the right to determine [their] own membership; the right to protect [their] own culture and language; and the right to educate [their] children in accordance with the values of your people” ( Coe, 1994). Although their identity is socially constructed, it is critical for them to maintain their own culture because they are allow to identify themselves upon their interest and perspectives. Research by Eisenberg (2013) says that “in Canada, most Indigenous actors criticized the state for failing to be faithful to the treaties and not recognizing the Indigenous right to sovereignty and self-determination.” For instance, he mentioned that they should have the right to survive
The Palace of Versailles was the official home of the Kings of France from 1682 until 1790. Originally, a hunting lodge built in 1624 by Louis XIII, but then was expanded by Louis XIV in the beginning of 1669. With beautiful architecture and amazing landscape, it is one of the most well- known and beautiful palaces in France. Its garden is so unique and one of Europe's largest. It played a huge responsibility in French government and was used for some of the biggest meetings of Kings and Queens. It is a very reflective place for the French and showed a basis of culture for the people. The small structure became the base on which was constructed into one of the most extravagant buildings in the world. The Palace of Versailles is a famous French landmark due to its elaborate construction, its role as a center of government, and its influence on French culture.