Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Approaches in crime prevention
Shortcomings of routine activity theory
Shortcomings of routine activity theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Approaches in crime prevention
Operation Stop Gang Violence (OSGV) aims to prevent gang violence through the use of situational crime prevention, which is rooted in routine activity theory. Situational crime prevention utilizes “discrete managerial and environmental” changes to reduce the opportunity for crimes to occur (Clarke, 1997, 2). This strategy focuses on the location of the crime, rather than the reasoning behind it. Situational crime prevention arises out of routine activity theory, which states that crime occurs when a motivated offender, suitable target, and the absence of a capable guardian converge in space and time (Cohen & Felson, 1979). According to routine activity theory, if one of these three elements is absent a crime will not occur. Furthermore, a person’s …show more content…
The situational crime prevention techniques employed by OSGV include, installing 6-foot-high iron gates to close roads leading to and from gang-violence hotspots and having police officers monitor blocks for graffiti and tagging. Utilizing iron gates that restrict access to and from gang-violence hotspots are an example of target hardening, and access control, which are opportunity-reducing techniques, derived from situational crime prevention. Target hardening includes the use of physical barriers to obstruct criminals (Clarke, 1997). Therefore the iron gates are a prime example of a target hardening technique. These gates change a person’s daily routine, altering their daily route, which according to routine activity theory can aid in preventing crime. Access control, refers to measures implemented to prevent potential offenders from entering certain areas (Clarke, 1997). The iron gates help prevent potential offenders from entering violent gang territory. These situational crime prevention techniques are influenced by routine activity theory and inhibit offenders from gaining easy access to gang hotspots and areas that are commonly tagged. The gates inhibit traffic flow to the ten blocks therefore causing them to impede on the convergence in time and space of motivated offenders, suitable targets, and the absence of capable guardians (Cohen & Felson, …show more content…
Formal surveillance is another opportunity-reducing measure inspired by routine activities theory and is utilized in OSGV through the use of police officers (Clark, 1997). Police officers are assigned to blocks and are supposed to look for evidence of graffiti. The police officers are expected to patrol the vandalized areas and arrest offenders who are caught re-tagging. The officers as formal surveillance are being used as capable guardians to thwart potential offenders (Clark, 1997). The addition of police officers as capable guardians disrupts the convergence of a suitable target, and motivated offender. Having a capable guardian, according to routine activity theory, “is sufficient to prevent the successful completion” of a crime (Cohen & Felson, 1979,
A Climate of Fear “The Gang Crackdown”, provided by PBS, communicates the everyday struggles that the communities of Nassau County face every day. The video’s focus revolves around the homicidal and violent crimes that have been provided by the “MS-13” and the details of cracking down on their development. The Latin American gang from El Salvador is known for their audacity to target the young population of Long Island and their homicidal tendencies. They have targeted children and teenagers at their workplace, their home, and their school. These gang members have left the community defenseless and struck fear into the hearts of many parents along with the government itself.
Situational crime prevention is an idea criminologists use in order to reduce the chances of crime initially taking place. This theory does not aim to punish criminals after the crime has taken place like the criminal justice system does, but however the opposite, it aims to reduce the chances of the crime taking place to start with. Ron Clarke (2005) describes this theory as an approach that aims to reduce the opportunities out there for crime, involving rational choice theory. Clark focuses on three methods within this theory, directing at specific crimes, altering the environment we live in and aiming to reduce the benefits of committing crimes.
In 2003 as a response to communities with a large amount and growing number of youth gangs the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice, initiated the Gang Reduction Program (GRP) (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). The formation of gangs is seen as a response to system failures and community dysfunction. As a result, one of OJJPD’s anti-gang initiatives is to make communities safer and have a pro-social environment (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). Furthermore, OJJDP plans to provide economic and social opportunities that gangs often promise to new recruits which are often obtained in an illegal and dangerous fashion (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). OJJDP believes that the GRP is capable of addressing the underlying issues for the increasing popularity and intensity of gang activity in specific suburban and rural neighborhoods (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). The program takes an integrative approach to dealing with the issue of increasing membership and participation with gangs. The following will discuss the program’s goal, theoretical basis, methods of operation, and overall effectiveness. After reviewing these major aspects of the GRP I will personally assess the value of this program and conclude whether or not the evidence supporting the program’s efficiency is strong enough for me to recommend it for implementation.
Based upon the evidence provided on the six elements of a good theory, the Routine Activities Theory is a sound theory. These elements provide that the theory is scientific. The theory has brought together its three elements to help determine why crime occurs. Through research by multiple detached researchers, its hypotheses have been confirmed through tests and empirical evidence.
Street Gangs are becoming popular in many cities across the country. According to the Department of Justice's 2005 National Gang Threat Assessment, there are at least 21,500 gangs and more than 731,000 active gang members (Grabianowski). Gangs bring fear and violence to neighborhoods, drugs, destroy property, involve youth in crimes and drive out businesses. When you have gangs in a community, it affects everyone in the community. An alarming amount of young adults are joining gangs and becoming involved in illegal activity. Most gangs have a rule that when you join the gang you are a member of the gang for life. Gangs can be removed from our communities with more community involvement and education.
This prevention strategy is primarily aimed at reducing the opportunities for crime which arises from everyday life rather than simply responding to crime; relying on the police after the offence for e.g. using closed circuit television surveillance (CCTV) in surroundings that crime might occur with regards to preventing potential offending from causing an offence. For e.g. by placing a limit of access of such a person to shopping malls “only 3 school children are allowed per shopping”. This approach also aims to ‘remove the excuse’ that is eliminating anything that is eye-catching to criminals about accomplishing that specific crime. An illustration of this is the technique they use at the shoe outlet. At the Footlocker shop, there is only one shoe on the display counter, this makes stealing the shoe unpleasing and unproductive for thieve because it would not be logical to steal only one shoe regardless if...
Crime control, consisting of many elements of prevention and punishment, is a widely debated and often contentious topic. Myriad agendas occur in government and society, depending upon the kind of organizational or philosophical objective trying to be met. Political differences are present within the criminal justice system that draw upon certain models, techniques, and methods associated with crime prevention. Society functions as another element in crime control, as often an underlying fear creates a pressure to enact programs and laws. The media enters in as a forum to present conservative and liberal opinions to enact and enforce criminal laws and punishment. A debate over crime often strives to define prevention and punishment, in models that make these terms mutually exclusive, versus a view that crime prevention is a result, and punishment only one possible tool for achieving that result. Different forms of punishment will be discussed in relationship to the criminal justice system as well as the purpose the punishment serves, problems relating to the punishment, and an opinion on improvements and solutions.
There have been many contributors when it came to tackling anti-social behaviour and preventing crime however, the most influential contributors are Wilson and Kelling. They came up with the theory of broken window which will be further explain in this essay. This essay will outline the broken window theory, as well as explain what is meant by broken window. Finally it will give examples that exemplify the broken window theory. (Maguire, Morgan and Reiner, 2012)
Ronald V Clarke originally developed the idea of situational crime prevention in the 1980’s (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). This particular crime prevention theory addresses techniques that increase the effort required to commit the crime, increase the risks involved with committing the crime, reducing the reward gained by the offender after committing the crime, reducing the provocation between the offender and others and remove excuses (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Majority of crime is believed to be committed because there are no high risks of being caught and the rewards outweigh the risks (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Increasing the effort by controlling access to locations and target hardening can deflect many offenders, as more effort is needed to commit the crime (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Another main technique would be to increase the risks; this may be achieved by extending guardianship, creating natural surveillance or artificial surveillance such as CCTV (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005).
Stopping gang violence requires more than just the law enforcement in solving gang problems. Gang involvement among youths remains to be a prevalent problem to parents and society. It is often associated with violence and other criminal activities within the community. Though reasons remain to be varied, youth participation continues to increase through out the years. In seeking then to understand the motivation for youths joining gangs, it is essential to look at good family function, which promotes healthy development, as well as looking at how poor family function, is related to poor outcomes for youths. The questions to also keep in mind when it comes to family function is which aspects of parenting are risk factors to youths joining gangs as well as how can we help future families in decreasing those risks? Preventing youths from joining gangs in the first place is crucial in realizing on how to reduce youth gang activity. Which leads us to the question “can we stop gang violence?” My answer to this question is yes; we can stop gang violence with effective parenting. Although, school-based programs as well as community-based prevention programs may reduce gang violence, effective parenting stops gang involvement early on from childhood to adolescence.
Situational crime prevention reduces the opportunities for criminals to commit crime by making changes to or altering the environment with the assistance of the police, neighbors and other agencies (Worrall, 2008). The main theories of situational crime prevention are: environmental crime prevention, rational offender perspective, and routine activities (Worrall, 2008). Environmental crime prevention basically states that four elements must be present for a crime to occur: a target, a place (opportunity), a law, and an offender. Environmental crime prevention is designed to prevent people from breaking the law by altering street and building designs, or altering the environment to make it safer (Worrall, 2008). An example of this that is used by law enforcement is to place a sign at the public trash dumpsters informing the public that the area is being videotaped. This method is used to alter the publi...
Gang violence is a major problem in our society today. If nothing is done soon, gang violence could take place in our neighborhoods. MW Klein, a gang researcher, says that gangs are an aggregation of youths who perceive themselves as distinct, and that are viewed as distinct by the community. Klein also states that the gangs call forth a consistently negative image of themselves through their actions (Klein). To those involved in gangs however, gang membership provided a youth means of attempting to consolidate their gender identities (Douglas). Most of the early American street gangs have historically been ethnically based. Early gangs were mainly Irish, Polish, or Italian (Klein).
Routine Activity Theory Finally, the principles of the routine activity theory presume that the combination of a) availability of a suitable victim b) and presence of motivated and capable offenders. The more times these three elements are present, the higher are the chances that a person will be victimized. Nowadays, this theory is thought to be the most recognized in the academic circles, as well as it is most frequently used by the law enforcement communities in their propaganda campaigns (Wheeler, Book & Costello, 2009). As far as this case is concerned, this method of criminological thinking appears to be among the most relevant.
Southerland, E. H. & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott. Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the Community.
1).Situation crime prevention is an application of environment criminology. Its aimsto decrease crime by increasing both the efforts and risk of crime commission, decreasing the reward, and removing the provocations and excuses that increase the frequency of crime commission(Cornish and Clarke, 2003). Situational crime prevention requires of focus on specific forms of crime rather than on the perpetrator’s disposition, and seeks to alter the nature and prevalence of crime opportunities ( Clarke,2003).Routine activity theory (Cohen and Felson, 1979) originally described the three basic elements for a direct contact predatory crime occur. Crime events occur