Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Longer school days positive and affect
The negative effects of extending school hours
Longer school days positive and affect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The school time takes up a countless hours of a students life. Schooling can take the same amount of time as a job, not including the homework and projects. Like many jobs school should have a break to relax and take some time for themselves, or friends. Students would have a break to then refocus on the up coming classes and not lose interest half way through the day. The open campus lunch policy would have many benefits for the students. The student body is not a perfectly oiled machine. The real picture of a student body is semi oiled and rough around the edges. Every student would enjoy a break from constant lectures and class work to recuperate and focus. An open lunch policy would help immensely with the previously given points. …show more content…
Open campus lunch would give the student many benefits that a closed campus lunch can't offer. Every student can become more like an adult with the chance of an open campus lunch. With the new open campus lunch the student has a small glimpse into a workplace style of lunch. Many workplaces do not restrict where the worker can and cannot eat during their lunch break. A worker can leave to by a meal, eat at home, or even just stay and eat at the workplace. All of the opportunities can be the same for a student. Each student can learn time management, and if already learned can become better at it. Adults won't always be around to monitor students, so some adult privileges should be allowed. Such as letting a student choose their own diet, and even let some see the true cost of eating out everyday of the week. Experience isn't the only benefit for the student.
The student can now have a mental break. Lunch is a period of time not meant to be crowded with friends, food, school work, and everything else. It is a break to relax and do what the student would like to. Students can have extra time to eat now. The typical lunch period currently is around thirty minutes. Humans were not built to wait in a line to then devour food before having to leave. With an open campus lunch period the student can have some extra time to eat. Students can have a meet together or eat at a certain place together. Also students can choose varied foods, allowing them to have what is appetizing to them at that time. Or if the student want to leave school but not spend money they can eat or cook at home. Allowing the family to save money by not having to pay for school lunches. Plus the benefits are not just for …show more content…
students. Schools can benefit from the open campus lunch policy also. With students not eating lunch at the school, less lunches will need to be made. In which less workers would be needed in the kitchen on a daily basis. Saving the school a ton of money by the end of the year. With the saved money schools can pay for better equipment in the classroom, for teacher wages, or for sporting events. Not every student will be leaving, so workers will still be needed to cook for the amount of students that do not wish to leave school grounds at this time. Students that do leave will not be completely wasting their money. The money will help benefit local businesses causing the town to look better with strong businesses and a strong school. And many of the businesses that are being benefited can also donate back to the school for allowing the students to bring in more business. Although the benefits are great some of the drawback can be large as well. While the school is able to monitor students on school grounds they cannot do so off grounds. Each student would then be responsible for themselves and the others they are with. A student may make poor choices when released into a scenario they are not used to. Such as being late for class, a student has the choice to be safe and take their time, or do the opposite and rush back to the school potentially breaking laws at the same time. The student may have car problems not allowing them to return to class on a proper time. Although attendance and choices might not be the biggest problems. During the open campus lunch a student runs the chance of being in a accident. At anytime an accidents can happen and anyone can be involved. Students are not fully cared for when not monitored, making some parents worry for their child while at an open lunch. And with constant car use refueling for their vehicles will be constant, making their wallets suffer. Meals and gas prices are not very cheap, especially is being needed everyday. Now with both sides of the situations shown implementation is the next step. With allowing the students to leave the school campus for a lunch rules have to be made to allow curtain students to go and others to not.
One process could be only allowing students in good standing to be allowed off campus. If the students is not allowed to play in extra curricular then why should they be allowed to leave for an open lunch. Along with the students in good standings, check attendance after the lunch. If a students does not return after they have left for their lunch revoke the privilege for some time. Even just a week can prove to a student the importance of responsibility to return on time, very similar to a work place. Or if that plan does not work allow the students parents to chose wether the student can leave for open lunch, or is restricted to the school grounds. And possibly have the student or parent pay for a off campus lunch pass, similar to the parking passes currently being used. Even just having an age restriction only allowing upper class man to leave, as they are more likely to be responsible with their time and have better time management then the younger students. Although rules can be made, the time is much needed for a student to drive and get food. One solution to this problem would be to cut out seminar. Many students don't use seminar time wisely, or at all. So letting the time be used in a lunch scenario would help all students, and still allow the students needing help to get help after school. With all options laid out
on the table now the choice is yours. With a large choice such as this time will be needed. Rules will have to be set, and implementation will slowly follow, but with benefits to the students the choice should be clear. Having an open campus lunch will help the students and staff with both a social break and more time to then focus back on schooling. Allowing all aspects of schools to flourish.
First, there is a lot of benefits for open campus lunch. Open campus lunch gives all of the students an opportunity to learn responsibility. It is also a great way to teach them how to interact with the real world. It can make all student better adults in the future. They will learn from open campus lunch to not make big mistake.Once they get used to having open campus lunch, when they graduate they will know what to expect, because
Wandering kids. Bumper to bumper traffic. Drug dealing. Is this the picture drawn when local students have fifty minutes of freedom during lunch to do whatever they please? Students should not be allowed to leave their school campus during lunch. An open campus would lead to truancy, disturb local businesses and neighborhoods, and cause crime.
For the majority of high school students having the option to go home for lunch or to go somewhere to eat would be the ultimate dream. High school students do not think about the dangers and worry that open campus lunch would cause for staff and parents. They do not think about the small sum of students who would spend that time doing drugs or making messes at local businesses. There would also be an amount of students who would not return, or they may be late returning to school due to traffic at fast food places. Faculty would also have the fret of an increase of car accidents caused from the limited time students would have to go wherever and get back before their next class. On the other hand, students would learn responsibilities and time management. Parents would be forced to give their children money to eat out. Along with the money on their school lunch accounts, or they would be apart of the free lunch school program. Schools cannot have open campus lunches
Every student in all grades were able to leave during the time a scheduled class did not occupy. (Saslow, Linda. “Schools split on “open campus” NYtimes.com). Open campus lunch is the allowance of high school students to leave off the premises to a local restaurant for the duration of lunch. School districts in America have opposed open campus lunch benefits due to common knowledge and concern for potential student endangerment. A reason why schools should change educational environment would be to accommodate what students’ need to create comfortable working conditions. Old school methods included the repetitive process of helping students through daily material every day of the week with one break. Off campus school lunch was an unknown factor to high schools back
Recently closed campus has been an argument at our school lately. Should a student have the choice to leave campus? Yes it’s a great idea but lately the school board has been putting it in our heads that that is a bad idea. Students love an open campus it gives them variety. They hate the idea of eating the same unappealing meal every day. Lunch gives students a moment to blow off steam and have some free time. Open campus gives students the time to learn to be more responsible.
Dining facilities, especially the main on-campus food facility, Gibbons Dining Hall, need to remain open later to accommodate everyone. By giving students more time to eat, more students would opt for the more costly meal plans and not have to load up on snacks and other items from off campus stores such as Wal-mart. The less students go off campus, the more likely their revenue is to stay in the university. The addition of dining hours would certainly benefit everyone involved in the university.
I am convinced that students would do better in school if they had a midday break that allowed them enough time to eat a good meal because they need to recharge their brains with physical activity. This will give students an extra push to have more energy when they return back to class. Critics may exaggerate that this method will do nothing but make students drained and exhausted personally I disagree. A mid-day break for an hour will do nothing but strengthen us, all of us. It also will give students extra time to finish unfinished assignments and homework that wasn't completed at
One reason our school should get a new lunch menu is many students do not like the food served. For example, a survey was taken and of the 31 students 100% said they disliked the food. As student Bryan Huang said, “The lunches are horrible, they need better choices and more choices.” In other words, the food is not delicious and there are not many choices. Also, when children don’t get proper nutrition they have trouble focusing in school. Most students do not buy lunch because they feel it is unappealing and do not like the food served. Many students go to other kids and ask for food. In addition, many students do not eat breakfast so they rely on lunch to fuel them for the day. But, if they do not like the food served they won’t eat so they starve for the rest of the school day, which can
Lunch time is a time to take a break from the day and recharge for the rest of the day. In elementary schools it is also a time to meet up with your friends and socialize. Lunch time is not only time to eat. It is important for the mental, social, and emotional health of the children as well. Children need them chance to unwind and destress, which is promoted by socializing with friends. “Lunch should be an enjoyable part of the school day for students, offering a break from classroom work and a place to relax, socialize, and become nourished.”("The Cafeteria: Creating a Positive Mealtime Experience", 2013) Lunch time should be done in a setting where
If they ban students it can cause parents to be mad because their kids are not being able to eat lunch there. It can also cause the business to lose 75% of its customers. Also kids need a good lunch to be able to go back into class and be able to focus.
To solve this problem, we need the cafeteria to be open more hours. If it is because of the need of workers in those other times, it is a big change that even students won't mind to work in the cafeteria to have it open for longer hours. Another idea would be to have longer hours open for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Even if it is not open for the whole day, longer hours might allow more comfort ability for everyone. We know that with out food, one cannot concentrate in their studies, nor perform their work well.
We should not have longer school lunches. Longer school lunches has a great impact on everyone in school, it makes this issue worse. Students need what is best for them, which they already have. Short school lunches helps improve learning skills and lets students comprehend better. Our lunches are good as they are right now. We should not allow students to leave during school lunch.
open campus lunch would give them relaxation, freedom, and more concentration to come back more focused on their school work. Open campus lunch will aid in students dedication to want to come back to
Not only do students save time, but now students have the benefit of having a variety to choose from. Having multiple private food vendors on campus gives students a variety to choose from rather than just the usual. Students typically get tired of eating the same food. For instance, eating the same old breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day can make eating dreadful. Just like when a mom feeds her child last night 's leftovers. Eating just isn 't the same which is why students need a variety on campus. Now that there is a diversity of foods students are likely to stay on campus, which is beneficial if a student has back to back classes. Also, now that students have a variety to choose from, students can replenish their taste buds and keep themselves pleased. One other perk to having a variety is students can have a place they really enjoy. For instance, everyone has a favorite place to go to that is impossible to get sick of, it is very possible
However once you limit a students time, once they leave, find a place to eat, and actually eat they won't have time left during lunch to "goof off". Secondly, leaving school for lunch would help students by giving them a variety of choices. Eating school lunch often limits your food options. These foods the school serves could be non-appealing, unhealthy, or you may just dislike the food.