Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of the Olympics essay
History of the Olympics essay
Essays on the history of the olympics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of the Olympics essay
The Olympics is a sport event where there's different genres of sports competing for a gold medal. It all started in 776 BC, the Olympics was created by Baron Pierre de Coubertin well it was rebirthed by him in 1894. It's unknown who created the games but it all started in Greece for values and religious beliefs. A few advantages of hosting the Olympics games is free publicity, money, and create more jobs. The disadvantages for hosting a major event are: cost of money, taxes increase, and use of the Olympic stadium is useless after the games. One of top contenders in the Olympic figure skating is Shoma Uno and another top contender in the Olympics is Michael Phelps; a swimmer who won too many gold medals. How come we don't have football or baseball in the Olympics? It would make the …show more content…
I'm sure the ratings on the Olympic games would definitely be better. But then again, the United States will most likely conquer those sports. So, I guess you can say it’s predictable and not fair since the U.S. invented those sports.
But then why is basketball in the Olympics and boxing? So yes, football and baseball should be in there and this may be bias but that just means more gold medals for the U.S. The Olympics is expensive and is it worth it? I think not a lot of money, gone to waste for an event that happens only every 4 years and not I feel like most people don’t even watch the Olympics. I think it's going to end soon. Some people may love the games, but I personally don't even watch it or even care for it. If they want more views, then they have to put a sport in there that's never been the before. Not to be a hater or anything but the Olympics are boring, and I guarantee a good amount of people
Even though impact sports can toughen kids up and can give kids a lot of talent and impact sports can cause kids or young adult lifelong injuries, if keeping impact sports you could be putting a lot of kids or young adults at risk of traumatic life long injuries but not keeping it, you could have non people talented and not making money and not having some of america's sports today
Therefore, today I am going to persuade you as to why they should keep the Summer Olympics in Rio. First off, health inspectors are eliminating bodies of water where mosquitoes trying to reproduce could be found (LaGrave). Brazil has also stated they will clean up Rio?s body of water where athletes will be competing. There have been rumors about moving the water games during the Olympics further out into the ocean where the water will be cleaner (Khazan). Hosting the Olympics will cost Brazil more than $13 billion (La Grave).
The Reasons Behind the Increasing Commercialism of the Olympic Games The Olympic Games is a world wide event, held once every 4 years. It is the most important event amongst the elite athletes of today. It is viewed on television by billions of people across the world, by satellite transmission (started in Tokyo in 1964). This worldwide viewing attracted sponsors as they realised that by supporting the Olympics their product would be advertised on every product sold, as they would be the 'official sponsor'. The advances in technology has played a fundamental role in the increase in commercialism, as large sums of money are put forwards for television rights over the Games from companies such as Sky, the BBC and ABC.
In the article, it states, “At the London Games, the cost of the opening ceremonies alone was a whopping 42.3 billion” (Retrosi 2). This information is interesting but completely irrelevant to discovering cruelty in the Olympics. In this article, the complications of funding are also discussed, “America’s best athletes are almost entirely dependent on corporate sponsorships. For the athletes, the consequences of this addiction can be disastrous” (Retrosi 3). This statement shows off problems for athletes in the US, but still doesn’t detail any cruelty from the Olympics, because the Olympics has no control over how countries handle their athletes. Samantha Retrosi also mentions the US Army World Class Athletes Program, “ Today’s luge athletes have had to look elsewhere for support, with many having little choice but to join the US Army World Class Athletes Program … Apparently, one must be willing to enlist- and possibly fight and die for one’s country- in order to cover the expenses of international competition” (Retrosi 3). Once again, Samantha Retrosi’s statement has little to do with the Olympic Games and more to do with the way America handles its athletes. Therefore, Samantha Retrosi’s argument is significantly lacking because of the abundance of irrelevant information.
The sports industry is a very big business that contributes great amounts to the economy in terms of turnover, taxes and jobs. The sports industry has an economic cycle. So it depends on different parts of the year to hold big events. The benefits to be gained are that local communities as suppliers of services and goods obtain increased business.
I believe schools should not force students to participate in organized sports. Medical conditions, such as asthma, prevent students from being able to participate. Family situations may leave the student with no ride to or from practice. Students may not have time to be able to
The Olympic Games are the leading worldwide sport event that held every 4 years, featuring thousands of international athletes from more than 200 nations participating in a variety of sports competitions. Although the Games are about winning the sports competitions, they also provide a platform for the nations throughout the world to learn different cultures and share uniqueness. The Games are important, and have to be held because they transmit a message of friendship and peaceful between nations.
"Money makes the world go 'round." Sports could not exist without the presence of money. You have high paid athletes asking for multi-million dollar contacts, while at the same time you have doctors not even making close to that amount. There are corporations buying out sports teams, buying stadiums, and buying everything that has to do with sports. Someone may ask why they do this. Sports are one of the most profitable industries in the world. Everyone wants to get their hand on a piece of the action. Those individuals and industries that spend hundreds of millions of dollars on these sports teams are hoping to make a profit, but it may be an indirect profit. It could be a profit for the sports club, or it could be a promotion for another organization (i.e. Rupert Murdoch, FOX). The economics involved with sports has drastically changed over the last ten years. In the United States, we spend about 13% of all money on sports and entertainment. Sports has obviously done its job; entertained and drained money out of our pockets.
As such doubters of globalisation would debate that there would be larger financial division between the poor and the rich. That the money used for showing international mega-events would be better spent on social services or creating a better community in poorer areas. Some say that the money used for the events should be used for the better of the nation instead of using it for build stadiums or other advertisement. Several queries about if it is a level-playing field between nations. Furthermore if all countries have the similar kind of resources or income to allow their athletics to perform they’re greatest by training and preparing them for the sports and medal tally. There are several exploitation of work when these mega events happen in the country that is the host, relying on cheap labour of service class which make the people in poorer communities work harder to match globalisation. However there are the supporters of globalisation that are back up the international integration which allow economic development for poorer communities such as new jobs in service economy, international labour that allows individuals to move to different countries to work and also government investment in facilities which would benefit the communities. The mega-events are also showcasing the sport to the whole wide world which is the cause of promotion that will attracted tourist and people who would love to visit the country hosting the
A recent article in Readers Digest estimates that most Americans spend at least 13% of their income on sporting events and sport related products. Sports has entertained American people and drained money out of their pockets making sporting events an arena of pure economic activity. It has been proven that Americans will purchase tickets to attend sporting events, but this alone does not create enough revenue to keep sports teams profitable.
It has a great positive impact on a country’s economy. Firstly, it creates a large amount of jobs in hosting city(Harress, Christopher). Because hosting an Olympic is a significant project which can’t be done without many workers hard working. For example, to build those stadiums, government needs to hire a lot of engineers, masons, carpenters, etc. More Jobs means more goods and services are provided in order to build up a better society and environment for tourists, ultimately for country citizens’ future enjoyments. Secondly, tourists consumption will take part in benefits. During Olympic days, there are large amount of athletes, their family members, basically people from other country jams into hosting city, statistically, over 2,000 athletes from 201 nations participated into the Summer Olympic in 2012. It means enormous consumptions of goods emerged. With the gigantic production of more workers, those goods can be provided on time. Therefore, it promotes country’s economy significantly overtime. Comparing to the period of time be...
Why should countries compete to host expensive ‘mega-events’ like the Olympic Games? How might the Olympics benefit the economy of the host city if there is any benefit at all? After extensive research, I have realized that many studies draw a fine line between wether the Olympics benefit a host city's economy or not. The result of hosting an event such as the Olympics is constantly changing from city to city. Some host cities experience economic benefits in some components of their economy but not others.
One may disagree that hosting Olympics is not worthwhile as it requires a city or a country to bring out an enormous sum of money for the preparation and planning of hosting the Olympics. Zimbalist (2012, pp. 116) says that the summer Games roughly generates a total of $5-$6 billion and almost half of it belongs to the International Olympic Committee. On the other hand, the cost of the games has increased roughly
As Americans, we’re spoiled in terms of sports. The United States is home to some of the best sports leagues in the world. Want to watch the best baseball with the best players in the world? There’s MLB. Want to watch the best basketball league with the best players in the world? Just turn on an NBA game. Hockey? NHL. American football? Do you prefer college or the NFL? Want to watch the best soccer in the world? Well, you might have to look elsewhere for that.
The Olympic Games, defined as, “A group of modern international athletic contests held as separate winter and summer competitions every four years in a different city” (Olympic Games, n.d.), are highly anticipated by the whole world every four years because it holds the title of “the world’s preeminent sporting competition”(The Olympic Games, 2010). The upcoming 2016 Olympics will be held in beautiful Rio de Janeiro. The Olympics have been around for close to 3,000 years, originating in Olympia, Greece. Zeus, the mighty god of Greek mythology, is the reason the games began, because followers of Zeus wanted to honor him. (The Olympic Games, 2010).