More handpicked essays just for you.
Historians interpretations of oliver cromwell
Puritans religious beliefs thesis statement
The ideology and beliefs of the puritans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The aim of this essay, is to answer the long-awaited question 'Was
Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain? This question, is a hard one to
answer. James Heath once said "His name and memory stink." In
opposition, Samuel Pepys said "People look back and praise him." True?
Or Not? This essay will argue Edmond Ludlow's words," How glorious,
but then such betrayal!" Oliver Cromwell was neither a hero nor a
villain. The evidence and opinions gathered will state, how he went
from good to bad, and from bad to evil.
Oliver Cromwell, was a puritan gentleman from Huntingdon. He was born
on the 25th of April 1599, and brought up in a very wealthy family,
and a high social class. Cromwell, was an MP for Huntingdon, from
1628-1629. He had no fighting experience then, and was very worried
about the Roundhead army, at the battle of Edgehill. Cromwell then
went home to Huntingdon, and began to train his own army.
Cromwell was a magnificent soldier. He created a whole new army from
scratch, and he trained his army, in a special and unique way.
Cromwell would do anything to win his battles, and beat Prince Rupert
and if it meant making a whole new army, than so be it. To do this, he
picked his people of their ability, 'men of spirit', and not on their
status. He did this believing that this was right, as they were doing
Gods will. It also made the people happy, and so he continued doing
so. He also paid the men. He paid them 12D a day, so that encouraged
more men to stay. He was a strict commander, and his orders had to be
obeyed. Also, he always chose the right moment in a battle to attack.
Some local Roundheads, thought that Cromwell should have ...
... middle of paper ...
...er, but he just did what he felt he had to do. One thing
which I agree on, is that he could have gone about it a different way.
Also, I agree in one thing that he said, and also believed in. That
was that "The end justifies the Means." What he meant by that, was
that no matter what happens, something good always comes out at the
end, and it's the end outcome that really matters. The words that I
will leave you with, are the words of one Richard Baxter, a
parliamentarian. We are not sure whether we can trust these words or
not, as being a parliamentarian, he would have been a bit sympathetic
to Cromwell, but it's quite reasonable. "No man was better and worse
spoken of than he, he meant honestly, and was pious till power corrupted
him, he thinketh that the end being good and necessary, the necessary
means cannot be bad"
Oliver Cromwell was a prominent leader during the civil war. Cromwell played a leading role in capturing Charles I to trial and execution. During the civil war, Cromwell’s military abilities commit highly to the parliamentary victory which made him appointed as the new model army leader. Also, the parliaments determined that he would end the civil war as the powerful man in England. In the selection, Edmund Ludlow criticize about the new models of government. Cromwell dislikes the idea of new models of government because he feel the new models of government would destroy the power. Also, Ludlow criticizes about Cromwell’s power is being abused too much, so he feels that the nation should governed by its own. Cromwell’s responded that the government
... combat power against a numerically superior, well armed, and highly motivated enemy. His unwillingness to adapt to changing conditions was unrealistic and proved fatal.
After King Charles I’s execution in January 1649, Oliver Cromwell (25 April 1599 – 3 September 1658) became Lord Protector of the country. Oliver Cromwell was ruler of the country, with assistant of parliament from 25 December 1653, until his death, when his son Richard Cromwell took power. Cromwell wasn’t the king of the three kingdoms (England, Scotland and Ireland), but he had similar power. Over history it has been disputed whether he was a heroic, powerful saviour for the country, or an evil psychopath who took what they wanted. I have been looking at which one I believe that Cromwell was; a hero or a villain.
...n from the grave mistakes of the commanders of the past and become prepared to carry out these activities when we are called to do so.
Everyone has their own perception on what defines a hero; some may argue that they exhibit characteristics such as honesty or courage, while others may think that heroes have special power. Our society may have changed the values in which we associate heroes with, but one thing seems to have never changed: the main character of the book turns out as the hero. In my analyst, Holden Caulfield, the protagonist in The Catcher in the Rye, is put on trial as we see through our own eyes how Caulfield can not be considered a hero in modern society.
...itional chances to better his behavior, but his actions at the time did not reflect that he understood what that second change meant.
...rned the essential plans that a leader would need to lead him troops. He also had the morale and spirits to keep the troops ready to fight for the freedom they wanted, as well as his ability to command such troops in placement and tactics.
Henry V is not a simple one as it has many aspects. By looking into
The Revolutionary Policies of Henry VIII Henry was a supreme egotist. He advanced personal desires under the guise of public policy or moral right, forced his ministers to pay extreme penalties for his own mistakes, and summarily executed many with little excuse. In his later years he became grossly fat, paranoid, and unpredictable. Nonetheless he possessed considerable political insight, and he provided England with a visible and active national leader. Although Henry seemed to dominate his Parliaments, the importance of that institution increased significantly during his reign.
...ake when many of the men never really wanted to go but had to because they were chosen.
in some ways he did do the right thing because if he let the others
pushed men to enlist as a way of getting revenge for all the deaths in
Oliver Cromwell Although the disputation of religion also helped to stir up the English civil war, its fundamental causes were the constitutional conflicts. Many English and the members of the parliament, including Oliver Cromwell, were not satisfied with how the king ruled over their country. This was interfused with the conflicting issues over religions. Many English may have been frustrated by William Laud, Charles’ main political advisor pointed as the archbishop of Canterbury in 1633, who attempted to make reforms in the Church of England.
A hero is a man who is distinguished by exceptional courage, nobility. and strength to carry out tasks that involve great risks. A hero can also be a person who fights for other people to help or save them. from their fears and fears. He opposes the villain - a person who does wicked or intentionally harm others in some way, emotionally or otherwise.
Oliver Cromwell was a well known military dictator. He helped the Parliamentarians win the First Civil War and was named Lord Protector. He died in 1658 but many people still remember him as one of the best leaders in history although others believe he was a harsh tyrant and always wanted too much power for himself. Throughout the years, numerous historians have changed their views on whether he was a good leader or not. This work will look at three interpretations from different people on who Cromwell was and what he was like and compare them.