Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay for oligarchy as the best form of government
Oligarchy vs democracy essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay for oligarchy as the best form of government
Oligarchy is the first government. An oligarchy is a small group of wealthy people that are in charge of a big company or system. There are many advantages and disadvantages to an oligarchy. One advantage to an oligarchy is that decisions happen very quickly which makes everything easier. The second good thing about an oligarchy is that women are able to be in a position of power. That is great because if it is only men, there would only be a man’s perspective. With women sharing some of the power, there is some of the women’s perspective. Also debate still exists in an oligarchy. Debate is a good thing for a country or even a small city or town. People can hear other people’s view and listen and see which individual’s idea is better. On the …show more content…
An Aristocracy is when a small class of noble and privileged people are in control. (Dictionary.com) An advantage of using an Aristocracy is that this form of government gives control and leadership to qualified people. Also it prevents the rise of a single person and it divides the control between the people. With the encouragement of the ruling class, it has led to the increase of arts and culture in very historical places. The disadvantages of this government are quite serious too. With only a small group of people sharing the power, they may rule out any ideas of the public or citizens, and that could start a uproar. Also the leaders are definitely not held accountable for their actions and then the leaders are left with the idea that they can do anything they want, even if it hurts their country. And lastly the ruling class could act selfishly when creating rules and laws. Some countries that use this government are Denmark, England, and …show more content…
A Monarchy is a government in which one individual hold power until death or until they are deemed not fit to rule. (merriam-webster.com) In a monarchy, monarchs is allowed to do whatever they want to. Monarchy or dictatorship means “ruled by one”. An advantage to having a monarchy is that there is only one person that makes the decisions so they are usually made very quickly and are less arguments. Also countries that are ruled by monarchies have less corruption. A disadvantage to having a monarchy is that the masses do not have the power to remove the king or queen from power even if they are harming the country. Also a monarchy has a good chance of going into economic disrupt because most do not take the responsibility seriously. Some countries that have this kind of government are England, Spain, and Sweden.
Monarchy Extensive Research:
There are two different types of monarchy. There is Limited Monarchy and Absolute Monarchy. Limited Monarchy is when the monarch still has to abide by the rules and cannot create them without the permission of the government but he or she is usually able to override them if it deems necessary. In an Absolute Monarchy the monarch creates the rules that he or she feels is necessary and does not need the permission of anyone
Almost any place that you live in, you will find that there is some sort of government set up there. A government is basically a form of system of rule, by which state, community, etc. is governed by. Although, most places do have a government set up, the type of government in which they have differ from each place. One of the most popular forms of government that is used often today would be democracy; this means that the government is ruled by the people. Monarchy is another one that you should be aware of because it is one of the oldest forms of government and it is still used today in some places. A monarchy government consists of the rule
In summation this paper discussed the three correct types of regimes according to Aristotle; furthermore it examined the deviations of these regimes. This was done by firstly examining a regime led by royalty, secondly by observing the characteristics of an aristocratic regime and thirdly by discussing a regime ran by constitutional government. Finally defining the three correct types of regimes the deviations of these regimes: tyrannical, oligarchic and democratic were examined.
According to the text book, an absolute monarch is a king or queen who has unlimited power and seeks to control all aspects of society (McDougall little, 1045). In more simple terms, it is a ruler who can do just about anything without having to get permission from anyone, or having to worry about the repercussions. This was a trend that started in the 1600’s by European leaders who were rich, and didn’t like to be told what to do. These conflicts arose with the States-General in France, or Parliament in England who had substantial control. The first countries to have absolute rulers were the traditionally strong countries, such as England, Spain, and of course Louis XIV’s France.
Absolute Monarchy was a major form of government in Europe during the Renaissance. The monarch of that country controlled every aspect of their country and acts as the undisputed head of state. Whether economic, social, religious, or domestic the monarch had his say in every matter in their country. While except in places like the Middle East and Africa, absolute monarchs have ceased to exist, their policies and actions are used in the governments of today.
The government within the monarchical society was populated by the aristocracy. It was they who were depended upon for directing the course of governmental affairs. The controls of all co...
The Aristotelian view of democracy showed democracy as a supreme state of being, promoting equality more than anything. It allowed every person to have as much say in a government as any other person, and yet still allowed individuality to reign. To follow this path of "true" democracy is to follow the path to a perfect country. Yet America, which prides itself on being a truly democratic nation, is filled with corruption and extortion, nothing like the Utopia Aristotle portrayed.
With a dictionary definition (cited above), there is little end result between all definitions besides democracy. monarchy, oligarchy, aristocracy, tyranny all translate to few people or individual(s) ruling with power. Indeed, aristocracy and oligarchy are synonymous within this definition, as well as monarchy, aristocracy, and tyranny. The former being ruled by groups while the latter in definition are ruled by individuals. Not much difference.
At the top of this government was the royal family, headed by a king. They had a hierarchy throughout the land, and maintained control through the use of their army.
very efficient form of government, and so is a oligarchy, but in those governments it can be very
First most, people may suppose Thomas Hobbes is correct since he preferred an absolute monarchy. An absolute monarchy is when there is one ruler (called
One of the versions of governing is an oligarchy, a small group of people in control of a country. In book eight of the republic Plato explains the meaning of an oligarchy and when it is very unsuccessful. It doesn't work because whoever has the most wealth can take part in ruling over the city. Plato even explains "when virtue and riches are placed together in the scales of the balance, the one always rises as the other falls...
In this context, an absolute monarch would be revolve around a single leader (usually a king) that would make decisions without the assistance of the aristocracy, such as a the nobility, the parliament, or other organizations that include the interest of wealthy families or government officials. In this case, the king would act alone in deciding the political, economic, and military decisions of the people, which would illustrate the absolute power that is wielded by the individual making the decisions. This governmental interpretation of the term “absolute” defines how a king would rule without the interference or inhibitions of an aristocracy or democratic form of government. Of course, the realization of this type o government can be better explained through the context of the absolute monarchy in France, which was founded in the leadership of king Louis
These governments came in different styles such as a monarchy which was led by a king. Another form of government that was seen among the Greeks was aristocracy in which the polis was ruled by a small group of noble, land owning families. One of the more notable polis of ancient Greek was that of Sparta in which they used the oligarchy as there form of government. This type of government is where the people are ruled by a few powerful people. Finally, there was democracy which means “rule of the people” (The Legacy of Ancient Greece and Rome 1-7). This was the government that Athens utilized and helped establish. These varying types of government can be seen throughout governments today, however, it is the government established by the Athenians and their political structure that had a greater impact on the west than that of its Greek polis counterparts.
Any form of government in which there are restrictions as to who gets to have a part in the government is considered more of an oligarchy because it would limit the government to be ran by a small group of
qualified to rule the people. And an oligarchy is composed of ‘Oligarchy is the rule of the chosen