Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on america during the great depression
Of mice and men lennie analysis
Of mice and men candys relationship with George and Lennie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on america during the great depression
Candy is used to convey many of the novel’s key themes and messages about America during the Great Depression through both his character’s personality and also the events that happen to him/around him throughout the book. Through Candy, Steinbeck shows the judgemental nature of American society in the 1930s and the prejudice that was ingrained into the way people lived. In Candy’s first scene, the reader is immediately shown how racism was prevalent through the quote ‘ya see the stable buck’s a nigger’. Candy freely uses racial slurs instead of Crooks’ name which implies how little respect he gives the man due to his belief that racial differences makes him subordinate. In the same scene Candy gives his opinion of the boss as a ‘pretty nice fella’ eventhough he is well aware of how he treats Crooks on a regular basis- ‘give the stable buck hell’. He then goes on to reminiscise about a memory of the ranch workers fighting Crooks which is described as him ‘pausing in relish of the memory’ which clearly tells the reader that he enjoys remembering Crooks’ suffering. This acceptance of the Boss’ cruel acts, the justifying of it due to his race and the total lack …show more content…
of empathy all show Candy’s racism and judgement based on prejudices instead of actual interactions as he later admits to have never entered Crooks’ room before that scene despite his numerous years on the ranch. Also during his gossip, Candy is cruel about Curley’s wife. He makes various comments including ‘tart’ and ‘she got the eye’ even though she has only been on the ranch for two weeks so far. His judgement is purely based on her appearance as shown through the quote ‘look her over’. His actions give the impression that he is shallow but they could also be the result of his lack of status on ranch. By spreading negative rumours about others, he can make himself feel more important. His actions fit the social context of the book as racism and sexism were rife in this time. The suspicion surrounding Curley’s wife and the resulting harsh judgement is synomonous with both the real life treatment of women and the lack of trust towards any other person that made living on the ranches so harsh and unforgiving. Another aspect is how he is used to highlight the harshness of life that people during the 1930s suffered and how the weak were exploited within this. Candy has a physical weakness – his missing right hand- as well as a figurative weakness of no status or importance on the ranch. The author uses the terms to describe him ‘old Candy’ and ‘old swamper’ to put an emphasis on his age and resulting weakness. He is shown multiple times to have no voice or influence over the others which makes him even weaker. He is powerless to stop the death of his dog once an authority figure, in this case Slim, takes the side against him. This scene is important to his character and the display of how harsh life is as he is given little empathy throughout. The dog is an allegory for him and his future – growing too old to be useful and then easily replaced. Curley’s wife exploits his weakness to make herself feel stronger in the scene in Crooks’ shack when she tells him ‘nobody’s listen to you’.
George also uses Candy for his own gain as he lets him join in on the dream ranch due to his money but abandons him when he can no longer do it with Lennie despite the fact that he and Candy could still afford the ranch. This lack of compassion for others shown by Carlson towards Candy in the killing of his dog parallels how in American society there was little sympathy for others. The theme of survival of the fittest that was the base of ranch life is shown through the shooting of Candy’s old dog to be replaced by Slim’s new puppies. It is also shown through how the weak characters take advantage of eachother to gain superiority over one another instead of working
together. Another reason why Candy is important to the story is because he is used to show us how people in America were easily seduced by the American Dream but also how it eventually failed. Candy is desperate to escape the ranch following the realisation that he doesn’t have much time left in the aftermath of the death of his dog. The prospect proposed my Lennie and George of a better life is tempting which makes his makes rash decisions with little forethought. It starts fairly simple with ‘s’pose I went with you guys’ but quickly becomes an obsession ‘he just sets there in the bunkhouse… figuring’ which shows the reader how important the American dream was to people and how it became their sole focus. It helps him escape his miserable reality which gives him extra confidence as shown through his interactions with Curley and his wife: ‘you ain’t wanted here’ and ‘you goddamn tramp’. However the frailty and inevitable destruction of the dream is demonstrated when Lennie kills Curley’s wife and George gives up. Steinbeck uses Candy’s character to show how American society in the Great Depression revolved around the American Dream and that hope for a better future but also shows his views that it is false hope when Candy is left alone on the ranch with nothing ahead of him except more years of suffering on the ranch. Overall, I believe that Candy is very important to the novel as he was essential in the build- up of the dream in the main plot whilst telling the author’s messages through his actions. Although he isn’t shown to be a very nice person to many of the characters, the reader feels pity for him as his life seems to have been harsh and by the end there is little hope for him which parallels how the reader would feel for the people of 1930s America.
Candy’s dog is very precious to him, not only because he had been with him ever since he was a pup but also because he could see himself in the dogs place after a very short period of time. He was getting old and would be of no use soon. Just like the dog, everyone would be eager to get rid of him. He had lost his hand at the ranch. He is disabled, both, physically and mentally.
Steinbeck describes Candy right after the men hear the shot that kills the dog. Candy's loneliness over the loss of his dog is short lived as he becomes part of George's and Lennie's plan to get their own farm. In fact, Candy makes the dream seem almost possible because he has saved $300 which he will contribute to the price of the property George can buy. The three men believe that one day they will up and leave the ranch and go live on their own "little piece of land." In the end, however, Candy is plunged back into despair and loneliness after he discovers Lennie has killed Curley's wife. The dream is shattered. He poignantly communicates his feelings over the loss at the end of chapter five: “You done it, di’n’t you? I s’pose you’re glad. Ever’body knowed you’d mess things up. You wasn’t no good. You ain’t no good now, you lousy tart.” He sniveled, and his voice shook. “I could of hoed in the garden and washed dishes for them guys.” He paused, and then went on in a singsong. And he repeated the old words: “If they was a circus or a baseball game .
In Crooks. room, Lennie came to talk to him. Crooks was cautious at first, this was from the years of racism that Crooks endured, he learned not to associate with white folk. Steinbeck expresses the theme of loneliness in the character of Candy. Candy is lonely because he is missing half an arm.
In both the film and the book, Candy is often isolated from all the others. Because of an injury to his hand, he can 't work out in the fields, so much of his time is spent alone shuffling around the ranch doing small jobs. His one and only constant companion is his dog. It is a very old dog that he has had since he was a pup. Again, both the book and the film do a good job of showing the affection that the dog and Candy have for each other. However, the book does a much better job of conveying the importance of the dog to Candy after the dog is shot. In the film scene, Carlson broaches the subject of killing Candy 's dog to put him out of his misery. Candy looks anguished but gives in fairly quickly. Once Carlson takes the dog, he lies back on his bed and just waits for the sound of the gunshot. The men resume their card game. (DVD) Although it is obvious Candy is sad about the dog, it does not have the same emotional impact that the book does. In the book, Steinbeck better conveys Candy 's anguish and desperation to save the dog. He tries to put Carlson off by offering different arguments as to why not to shoot the dog. His arguments include that it might hurt the dog, that Carlson doesn 't have a gun, that tomorrow would be a better day and that he doesn 't mind taking care of him (44). He even pleads silently for help. "Candy looked about unhappily"(42). "Candy looked helplessly at him,
Steinbeck connects Candy with his dog in order to suggest that humans have created a society where the weak cannot survive. Earlier in the book, Candy describes his dog as the “best damn sheep dog I ever seen” (Steinbeck 44). However, in lines 9 and 10, Candy reiterates that the other workers shot his dog because “he wasn’t no good to himself nor nobody else.” As soon as the dog outgrows its usefulness by becoming old and blind, the other tenants team up to ensure its death, suggesting how society joins together to dispose of those who are weak. Steinbeck then connects Ca...
aiding others in their power struggle. Candy is only seen for his age, which is a sign of
As previously mentioned, one conflict includes idealism versus reality. The middle-class in general, and George and Lennie specifically, illustrates the problems they face when dreams of a better life are short-lived due to the reality of circumstances encountered and the Depression. Also, the man versus man conflict is seen on a regular basis throughout the novel. The ranch hands indirectly put pressure on George to shoot Lennie. The ranch hands forced that Candy's dog be shot. Also, the novel sheds light on the inner conflict within certain characters. For example, George struggles with the caring for Lennie, or putting both himself and Lennie at peace for good by killing Lennie. Candy also fears that he, like his dog, will be cast aside whenever he is no longer of use.
This is the piece of speech, when Candy is trying to persuade George to let him in on the ranch their going to get. The language Steinbeck uses here, makes Candy seem overly eager to get in with George and Lennie. Mainly because, he’s dog dies so now he doesn’t have anybody, and he feels he might get canned. So as soon as he hears the opportunity to break away from being lonely, he jumps at it. I feel extremely sorry for Candy because he has nobody to turn to. He really does try to find friendship in people, but sometimes tries to hard.
The turning point of the novel, where for an instant George and Lennie’s dream finally seems attainable, is the introduction of the dream to Candy. It is at this moment, where a dream shared between two men, spreads out to three because of the irresistible offer that Candy makes the two travellers: his money. Candy negotiates with George and Lennie where he says “’S’pose I went in with you guys. Tha’s three hundred an’ fifty bucks I’d put in. I ain’t much good, but I could cook and tend the chickens and hoe the garden some. How’d that be?’” (Steinbeck 67). Candy believed that the dream of owning land was unattainable to him because of the loss of his hand, however, by backing George’s ambition financially begins to reignite hope in the old man. As Lennie gets increasingly more excited at the prospects of finally being able to tend to the rabbits, he shares his plans with Crooks, a black stable-hand. Crooks after being convinced by both Candy and Lennie at its potentiality, suggests his own assistance to the trio when he states: “…If you…guys would want a hand to work for nothing– just his keep, why I’d come an’ lend a hand. I ain’t so crippled I can’t work like a son-of-a-bitch if I want to” (Steinbeck 87). This growing community of workers, combining their personal assets and desires now have
Candy and Lennie become two of the most similar characters in the book. Both of them are treated as if they aren’t as important on the ranch. Because of this, Candy finds comfort in spending time with George and Lennie. Like Lennie, Candy ends up finding friendship and purpose with George. As George and Candy’s characters evolve, so does the idea of symbolism in the
The central element of this novella is its symbolism. This novella has plenty of symbolical forms, such as people, creed, and some of the animals. Candy has several terms of symbolism, for example his disability is a symbol of the migrant workers who are just literally forgotten about, they are forgotten when they are no use to the owners. Candy’s dog is a symbol of a life only for advantage to others Lennie also for shadows this, he is belittled of his mind but enormously commented for his strength. Also he is compelled to lie about the fight he had with Curley, this is a symbol of typical male society in the, “Depression era”.
6th Period Choices and Regret By Isreal Yancey Have you ever made a choice in life that made you regret it? Did fate made a cruel turn of events in your life before? Can you fix a bad choice that isn’t permanent? Choices in the Mice and Men by John Steinbeck had some cruel decisions for these characters by fate or themselves. Life and fate the three characters of Curley’s wife, Candy/Carlson, and George are the characters I’m going to discuss in this essay.Curley’s wife made some tough decisions in her life and she isn’t too happy with those decisions. Marrying moving with Curley was the first decision that she made because she had no one else she could find for money in the and she had no job. In the 1930s the only way women can make money
Also George and Lennie (and all the other ranch workers) have a dream, when this dream is broken and will never happen, all of the workers get angry and violent to others on the ranch showing their frustration and how they will never get a sense of security, comfort or companions. The first example we see of this, is when Carlson bullies Curley in forcing Curley to let his dog be killed and gotten rid of because “He ain’t no good to you, Candy. An’ he ain’t no good to himself.” Carlson feels important and in-charge, just like he wanted to be (...
In the part of the novel where Carlson deemed Candy’s dog ‘unfit to be kept alive, Candy
George and Lennie have to continue to move around the country looking for work until Lennie screws up again. The instability of work only makes it that much harder for them to complete their dream of a farm of their own. Candy’s participation in the dream of the farm upgrades the dream into a possible reality. As the tending of rabbits comes closer to happening fate curses them with the accidental death of Curley’s wife. The end of their wishful thinking is summed up by Candy’s question on page 104, “Then-it’s all off?”