Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Opening chapter of crime and punishment
Opening chapter of crime and punishment
Opening chapter of crime and punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Opening chapter of crime and punishment
Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky, originally published in 1866, tells the story of a young man who commits a crime to prove his superiority to the societal system around him, then suffers mental, emotional, and physical anguish until he admits to his crimes. Dostoevsky uses biblical allusions from The New Testament throughout the novel, which play a major role in character development. These allusions are made evident to the reader through characters and the situations they were involved in, especially in the main characters, Raskolnikov and Sonia, through the depictions created by Dostoevsky for characterization throughout the book. Consequently, Dostoevsky incorporated these allusions by developing two major archetypal characters, …show more content…
the Tragic Hero and the Savior, which consecutively have similar relations to Jesus Christ and the stereotypical Christian. Raskolnikov himself is the perfect archetype of the Tragic Hero because of his extreme hubris, which results in his struggle to be “good", as opposed to evil. This intense pride results in his paradoxical nature throughout the book. His very name “Raskolnikov” starts with “raskol”, which means “schism” or “divide” in the Russian language. This split is very apparent when Dostoevsky describes Raskolnikov’s emotional state throughout Crime and Punishment. It is especially apparent when he confesses to Sonia about the crime. In this scene of Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov is so overcome with remorse that he “did not struggle against it” and allowed “two tears” to form (Dostoevsky 391). In response to this, Sonia tells him that she’ll stay with him and follow him to Siberia. However, after hearing those words, he “recoiled at this, and the same hostile, almost haughty smile, came to his lips...In this changed tone, she seemed to hear the murderer speaking.” (Dostoevsky 391). As he speaks to her, he seems very remorseful, emotionally broken down, and vulnerable. However, after she tells him that he should confess, he reverts back to being very proud, spiteful, and unapologetic. This is evident in his statement, “I’ve only killed a louse…a useless, loathsome, harmful creature.” (Dostoevsky 395). This statement shows that, even though Raskolnikov feels ashamed of what he did, he’s still too proud to confess to his crime. Dostoevsky made this drastic emotional shift happen repeatedly throughout the book, and it proves that the struggle in Raskolnikov between humility and pride over his crime is an important parallel to the struggle of Christians between good and evil. Another important depiction of the Tragic Hero in Raskolnikov is his mental state. Before the crime, Dostoevsky depicts him to be suffering from an internal turmoil over whether or not he should go through with his plans, or, for that matter, was actually capable of committing the crime in the first place. Then, after Raskolnikov commits the murder, Dostoevsky makes Rodya's suffering perpetuate when he wrestles with the idea of confessing or keeping his crime a secret. It is very prominent where he says, “Surely it isn’t beginning already? Surely it isn’t my punishment coming upon me? It is!” (Dostoevsky 90). This quote represents that Raskolnikov is aware that what he did was wrong, however, it helps Dostoevsky prove to the reader that every sinner who doesn’t immediately confess will struggle with guilt. There are many scenarios given by Dostoevsky of Raskolnikov doubting himself, then being so self-assured that he comes off as cocky and thinking of others in an endearing way, then wishing they would all just leave him alone. This is the best depiction of paradox because Raskolnikov's self-doubt lasts throughout the novel, especially in the words, “Good God! Can it be…that I will really take an axe, that I will strike her on the head…Good God, can it be?” (Dostoevsky 60). This self-doubt is very crucial to his paradoxical characteristics because it is the major cause of this schism from before he kills the pawnbroker, all the way to the end when he realizes that even he, a murderer, can have a second chance. This second chance motif was best represented through the Savior archetype, which Dostoevsky displayed through Sonia. In the novel, Sonia is first introduced as a small, timid girl who prostitutes herself in order to support her family. However, later in the novel, she’s depicted as a savior by being the one person that leads Raskolnikov to recovering from his perpetual torment by coaxing him to confess. When Raskolnikov asks her what he should do to end his suffering, Sonia immediately says; Stand up!...Go at once, this minute, stand at the crossroads, bow down, kiss the earth which you have defiled and then bow down to all the world and say to all men aloud, ‘I am a murderer!’ Then god will send you live again...Suffer and atone for your sin by Him that’s what you must do. (Dostoevsky 399). In this section, Sonia’s zeal for God is incorporated in her answer, and she continues to maintain this idea of “acknowledge and God will forgive” throughout the book all the way until he finally does confess. This is important because she is the first person he tells about what he did and the only one that was able to convince him to confess, which means that she was the main catalyst that caused him to finally turn himself in. A Savior archetype usually encourages the person they’re saving to change, rather than forcing it, which is what Sonia did. The Savior and Tragic Hero archetypes in Sonia and Raskolnikov were important.
The relationship they had with one another in Crime and Punishment were allusions to the depiction of Jesus’ relationships with sinners. Jesus’ love for people is unconditional and he loves everyone, regardless of what they’ve done. His love for sinners is similar to Sonia’s love for Raskolnikov because she followed him all the way to Siberia and continued to love him, even when he rejected her. Then, in the end when Raskolnikov finally realizes that she loves him, in spite of his crime, he cries in her arms and she “understood, and a light of infinite happiness came into her eyes. She knew and had no doubt that he loved her above everything else and at last that moment had come...” (Dostoevsky 520). After this, Raskolnikov is like a totally different person and is so different that “all the convicts who had been his enemies looked at him differently; he had even started talking to them and they answered him in a friendly way.” (Dostoevsky 520). Like Jesus, Sonia was there for Raskolnikov when he finally repented. This was one of the most important scenes in the book because it gave the reader an example of how coming to Jesus can change a person’s life and turn them into a completely new, if not better,
person. Throughout the novel, Dostoevsky intertwined the New Testament story of Jesus into his story of a murderer coping with the punishment of guilt and self-doubt. These allusions were very important because they not only develop strong main characters like Sonia and Raskolnikov, but make their struggles and issues so realistic that the reader can relate to them. Creating such charismatic characters allowed Dostoevsky to convey the biblical message in a subtle, but powerful way. Through the Savior and Tragic Hero archetypes found in Sonia and Raskolnikov, Dostoevsky made the powerful statement that Christ’s love is unconditional and that He will wait for you and welcome you no matter who you are, no matter who’s turned you away, and no matter what you’ve done.
As Rodya analyzes Luzhin’s character, he realizes that intellect unrestrained by moral purpose is dangerous due to the fact that many shrewd people can look right through that false façade. Luzhin’s false façade of intellect does not fool Rodya or Razumikhin, and although they try to convince Dunya into not marrying Luzhin, she does not listen. Rodya believes that Luzhin’s “moral purpose” is to “marry an honest girl…who has experienced hardship” (36). The only way he is able to get Dunya to agree to marry him, is by acting as if he is a very intellectual person, who is actually not as educated as he says he is. This illustrates the fact that Rodya knows that it is really dangerous because he knows that people can ruin their lives by acting to be someone they are not. Rodya also knows that people will isolate themselves from others just so that no one will find out their true personality. This is illustrated in through the fact that Luzhin tries to avoid Dunya and her mother as much as possible. The way he writes his letter, exemplifies his isolation, for Luzhin does not know how to interact with society. He has no idea how to write letters to his fiancée and his future mother in law. This reflects on Rodya’s second dream because he is unable to get Dunya married off to a nice person. He feels isolated from everyone else because his intellect caused him to sense that Luzhin is not telling the truth about his personality. However, it was due to his lack of moral purpose that Rodya berates his sister’s fiancé. He is unable to control himself, and due to his immoral act of getting drunk, Rodya loses all judgment and therefore goes and belittles Luzhin. Although Rodya’s intellectual mind had taken over and showed him that Luzhin wa...
Often times in literature, we are presented with quintessential characters that are all placed into the conventional categories of either good or bad. In these pieces, we are usually able to differentiate the characters and discover their true intentions from reading only a few chapters. However, in some remarkable pieces of work, authors create characters that are so realistic and so complex that we are unable to distinguish them as purely good or evil. In the novel Crime and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoevsky develops the morally ambiguous characters of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov to provide us with an interesting read and to give us a chance to evaluate each character.
Life is a wheel rolling inexorably forward through the temporal realm of existence. There are those that succumb to its motion and there are a certain few, like Christ and Napoleon, who temporarily grasp the wheel and shape all life around them. "Normal" people accept their positions in life and are bound by law and morality. Extraordinary people, on the other hand, supersede the law and forge the direction and progress of society. Crime and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, is the story of a group of people caught beneath the wheel and their different reactions to their predicament. One individual, Raskolnikov, refuses to acknowledge the bare fact of his mediocrity. In order to prove that he is extraordinary, he kills two innocent people. This despicable action does not bring him glory or prove his superiority, but leads to both his physical, mental, and spiritual destruction. After much inner turmoil and suffering, he discovers that when a person transgresses the boundaries of morality and detaches himself from the rest of humanity, faith in God and faith in others is the only path to redemption.
In his book Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky explores the paths of two men, Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov. These two men encompass many similar problems and obstacles throughout their lives. Both commit murders and are faced with the long and mentally excruciating journey of seeking redemption. They also share many characteristics of their personalities. The reason that the outcomes of their lives are so drastically different is due to the fact that they have completely different perspectives on life.
It was both this interesting plot and the philosophical nature of Dostoyevsky's writing, which initially attracted me to this book. It also features many themes and characters, as well as an effective setting. As a result, I will examine the literary techniques used in "Crime and Punishment" by Fyodor Dostoyevsky to convey the downfall and subsequent rise of the main character, Raskolnikov. I will begin by looking at how the setting formed Raskolnikov's character, and then discuss the structure and other characters of the novel. The setting plays a primary role in forming Raskolnikov's character.
In Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky gives the reader an inside look to the value system that he holds for himself, as well as the type of characteristics that he abhors in people as well as the characteristics that he admires in people. He uses characters in the novel to express his beliefs of what a person should be like in life to be a “good'; person. Specifically he uses Raskolnokv to show both good and bad characteristics that he likes in people. Also he uses Svidriglaiov and Luzin to demonstrate the characteristics that people should shun and his personal dislikes in people.
From the moment when Raskalnikov murders the old woman, his personality begins to change drastically. Dostoevsky challenges the reader to understand the madness which ensues by first demonstrating that the ideas and convictions to which Raskalnikov clung died along with the women. While the reader struggles with this realization, Dostoevsky incorporates the Biblical legend of Lazarus as a symbolic mirror for Raskalnikov's mind. By connecting the two, the reader encounters the foreshadowing of a rebirth of morals and beliefs, though what form this may assume remains cryptic. As references to Lazarus continue to occur, the feeling of parallelism increases in intensity. Just as Raskalnikov slowly struggled through madness, Lazarus lay dying of a terrible disease. When Lazarus eventually dies, Raskalnikov mimes this by teetering on the edge of insanity, the death of the mind. Eventually Sonya begins to pull Raskalnikov back to reality by relieving a portion of his guilt. As his Christ figure, she accomplishes this by providing the moral and spiritual sturdiness which Raskalnikov lost after his debasement during the murders. Sonya affects him not by active manipulation, but via her basic character, just as Christ personified his beliefs through the manner in which he lived his life. No matter what Raskalnikov says or does to her, she accepts it and looks to God to forgive him, just as Jesus does in the Bible. This eventually convinces Raskalnikov that what he did was in fact a crime and that he must repent for it and"seek atonement".
In Crime and Punishment, women play the sacrificial role by denying their lives out of love to rescue others from turmoil. The most prominent woman who expresses this role is Sonia. Sonia lived a depraved life with an alcoholic father, a consumptive mother, and three younger siblings. At the age of eighteen, she was forced to surrender to a life of prostitution in order to support her family. Sonia’s stepmother describes her as a girl who “…would strip off her last garment, and sell it, and go barefoot, and give you everything, if you were in need” (Dostoevsky 335). During the death of her father, Sonia meets a man named Raskolnikov, who is obsessed with the idea of murder. Raskolnikov’s obsessive-compulsive demeanor consumes his daily lifestyle to the point that it causes physical and mental illness. However, Raskolnikov’s behavior changes when Sonia reassures him that they will “suffer together” and “bear the cross together” (Dostoevsky 356). Sonia’s act of self-abnegation leads Raskolnikov back to humanity and convinces him to confess his sins. Sonia believes that one must “accept suffering and achieve atonement” (Dostoevsky 355) to claim the road of redemption. This devotion towards others allows her to embody a Christ figure and people “relied on Sonya” (Dostoevsky 455). For example, Sonia helps carry the burdens for her family and Raskolnikov like Chr...
One of the aspects of Crime and Punishment that stands out is that it is much more than a simple crime story. It is in fact a great study of the mind of a murder. Raskolnikov is a terrifying but sympathetic main character precisely because he is just twisted enough, just ill enough, for the reader to believe anyone is capable of such atrocities. The jumping off point for Raskolnikov is his idea of extraordinary and ordinary people. Looking at his theory and applying it as a tool for analysis of Raskolnikov himself leads not only to a deeper understanding of this idea but also of Raskolnikov. It also explains to some degree how seemingly benign ideas can lead a believer to do unspeakable things.
Dostoevsky's 1865 novel Crime and Punishment is the story of an expelled university student's murder of an old pawnbroker and her sister. The idealistic ex-student, Raskolnikov, is ultimately unable to live up to his own nihilistic theory of what makes a "Great Man" and, overcome by fits of morality, betrays himself to the police. Exiled to Siberia, suffering redeems the unfortunate young dreamer. Crime and Punishment is similar in many ways to Balzac's Pere Goriot, especially in respect to questions of morality. In Balzac, the master-criminal Vautrin lives by an amoral code similar to Raskolnikov's theory of Great Men.
It is apparent that the love between Sonia and Raskolnikov plays a crucial role in Crime and Punishment, pushing Raskolnikov in a direction he otherwise would not have gone. Dostoevsky uses their relationship as a tool to develop the philosophical themes in the novel and prompt profound changes in Raskolnikov’s character. Through their love, Dostoevsky demonstrates the importance of human relationships in finding and maintaining happiness. He also seeks to condemn nihilism and disprove the idea that one cannot make one’s own meaning in life by having Raskolnikov adopt Christian existentialism and find his purpose through Sonia.
Within the tortured mind of a young Russian university student, an epic battle rages between two opposite ideologies - the conservative Christianity characteristic of the time, and a new modernist humanism gaining prevalence in academia. Fyodor Dostoevsky in the novel Crime and Punishment uses this conflict to illustrate why the coldly rational thought that is the ideal of humanism represses our essential emotions and robs us of all that is human. He uses the changes in Raskolnikov's mental state to provide a human example of modernism's effect on man, placing emphasis upon the student's quest for forgiveness and the effect of repressed emotion. The moral side of Raskolnikov's mind requires absolution in a Christian manner. This need obliviates his claim to be a Nietzschean superman, and illustrates that all humans have a desire for morality.
Dostoevsky’s crime and punishment, is set in Tsarist Russia in the 19th century. Rodya Raskolnikov, the main character, is a student at a University in St. Petersburg. By the early stages of the novel, he has dropped out of school and is left in his one room shanty, to ponder his own philosophical questions. He is poor, hungry and desperate for money. He begins to sell some of his possessions to a pawnbroker, Alyona Ivanovna, to gain money for his basic survival. He begins to see the poverty and desperation of St. Petersburg at this time. Rodya would begin to look at Alyona as a source of this problem. Alyona, in Rodya’s eyes, was profiting off of the poverty and misery of others by buying off their possession at unreasonably low prices. She would then horde the money for herself while the people outside of her own apartment starved to death. Raskolnikov decides to murder the pawnbroker for the sake of humanity. His plan is not deeply thought out in advance and i...
After the botched crime Raskolnikov is plagued his failures. "He was conscious at the time that he had forgotten something that he ought not forget, and he tortured himself." (107) After he carelessly kills both women, and allows for the evidence to be found, Raskolnikov realizes he did not commit the perfect crime. This devastates his ego, so he tries to cling to his previous self perception. He is also plagued with feelings of guilt. His guilt, combined with the mistakes he made during the crime, shatter his self perception of perfection.
In Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, the theme of duality and the conflict between personal desires and morals is present throughout much of the novel. There are dual conflicts: one external between a disillusioned individual and his world, and the other internal between an isolated soul and his inner thoughts. It is the internal conflict in the main character, Raskolnikov, that is the focused on for much of the novel. The first of Rodya’s two sides is his intellectual side. This side of rodya is inhumane, and exhibiting extreme self-will and power. This is the side of him that comes up with his theory. The crime was a result of his theory that some people possess extraordinary abilities while others have no ability. It's this intellectual side of him that caused him to conceive and execute his murder. Through the authors use of setting tone, diction, and allusion, the readers get a better understand if what type of character, rodya is.