Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fate vs free will
The two most controversial situations in a person’s life are fate and free will, the determinants of why things happen the way they do (Hamilton 12). Whether or not what people go through is a result of fate or choice is a thing, which requires adequate deliberation. Fate describes a situation in which someone believe the idea that his or her future is already planned, even though they do not know what is going to happen to them. This, therefore implies that the individual will do a lot of things, but in the end, what happens to him or her is something previously outlined by forces of unknown nature. For instance, individuals who live unhappy lives may assume and believe that their misery is a result of their fate, and that they can do nothing about it. This is further referred to as fatalistic situation. Nonetheless, other people believe they have control over their fates by being brave, while improving their lives, as well. Free will, on the other hand, is the ability of a person to make choices without facing any form of constraints. It presents a situation in which people have every right to judge someone’s action since the doer is always in a position to control what he or she does. This principle of free will comes with religious, ethical, legal and scientific implications (Hamilton 44). From this perspective, it is evident that Oedipus faces experiences caused by fate, and has completely no control over the things happening in his life. He lives at a time when a prophet’s words mean a lot for a person, and all these affect his life in one way or the other. Hamlet, on the other hand, faces experiences duly caused by free will. He is in complete control of his actions, and has targets to achieve from everything he does. To b... ... middle of paper ... ...n in relation to their destinies. In the end, Oedipus has no control over his life experiences while Hamlet acts out of free will to determine his destiny. Works Cited Dandelion, Pink. Towards Tragedy/reclaiming Hope: Literature, Theology, and Sociology in Conversation. London: Ashgate, 2004. Hamilton, David. Destiny Vs Free Will: Why Things Happen the Way They Do. New York: Hay House Publishers, 2007. Jones, Ernest. Hamlet and Oedipus. New York: W. W. Norton, Incorporated, 1976. Shakespeare, William "Hamlet" 2014.Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. By X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2013. 915-939. Print. Sophocles. "Oedipus the King." 2014. Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. By X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2013. 860-870. Print.
Writing with Readings and Handbook. 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2013. 52-57. Print.
Updlike, John. "A&P." Literature. An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. 12th Ed. X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 12th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education (US), 2012. 17-21. Print
Tan, Amy. "Two Kinds". Literature, Reading Reacting,Writing. 5th ed. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Heinle, 2004.
Both Oedipus and Hamlet are tragic heroes because they contains all the characteristics needed to be considered one. Hamlet is a prince that had to see his mother get married again after his father unexpectedly died. A ghost appears around the castle and he claims that he is the king. He also tells Hamlet that he was murder which causes Hamlet to become skeptical. In order to confirm what the ghost says he conducts some investigations. It’s through a play, “The murder of Gonzago,” that Hamlet is able to confirm that what the ghost told him was completely true. After Hamlet discovers this he has to decide whether to bring an end to Claudius or let him be. One can consider this to be one of Hamlet’s biggest flaw. Hamlet shows his indecisive side. Hamlet can’t make a decision quickly which eventually leads him towards his defeat and also the suffering of people he is close to. “To be, or not to be” (Shakespeare 1750). A famous quote from Hamlet, but what does it mean? The quote comes directly from a Hamlet’s speech on whether it is better to be alive or dead. Hamlet goes on and on like a broken record discussing if death is the most appropriate thing
Kennedy, X. J., and Dana Gioia. Literature: an Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. New York: Pearson Longman, 2007. Print.
There are many reasons why both of these characters are classified as tragic figures. First off Oedipus' fate was determined from birth, and no one knew Hamlet's fate. Oedipus's parents sent him off to be killed, and Hamlet's father was killed by his brother Claudius.
In conclusion, Oedipus the King consisted of fate and free will. Not one more than the other because in order for fate to have taken its course; Oedipus had to use his free will to get there. Oedipus’s choices of free will to make his decision to find his identity, marry Jocasta, stay in Thebes, all led him to his fate of fulfilling the prophecy. Without even knowing it, the thing he tried so hard to run away from and prevent from happening was ultimately inevitable and it resulted in this great tragedy.
Tan, Amy. "Two Kinds". Literature, Reading Reacting,Writing. 5th ed. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Heinle, 2004. 527-535.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed “Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds” (Quote Details). It is believed that if a chain of events has been prophesied, then that person's choice and free will lead them inescapably to what has been predicted for their destiny. The idea that fate is the most powerful force on men, is essential to this play Oedipus the King. Perhaps the most incontrovertible instance of fate in this play is that of the prophecy made regarding Oedipus's birth; Oedipus was destined to kill his father and sleep with his mother “no matter what he or anyone else might do to prevent it and quite apart from the circuitous causal route that it took for him to get there” (Solomon). In the tragedy of Oedipus the Kind, it is by the hand of his own foible that he creates a ripple of misfortunes; It is by fate, freewill, and Oedipus' pride which led to his tragic down fall.
According to Aristotle there are five characteristics of a tragic hero: Flaw or error of judgment, (Peripeteia) a reversal of fortune, the enlightenment (anagnorisis) the discovery or recognition, (hubris) excessive pride, and the character’s fate. Oedipus finds the elders of Thebes praying to the gods for liberation of the plague. Oedipus “alone can help. The cause of the trouble is himself; the chances he has had in his life are precisely the source of the plague” (Diski 1). Oedipus is the cause and the solution to end the plague, but he is blind to the true. Hamlet, differently from Oedipus, is a “man of thought and action, a justice seeker and a criminal, a victim and a wrongdoer, a deeply reflective introvert and a man capable of acting on impulse” (McHugh 1). Hamlet’s free will, injected him with the desire to vengeance his father at any cause. Both Hamlet and Oedipus meet all of the characteristics of a tragic hero. In the beginning of both stories is introduced the first characteristic of a tragic hero, the flaw and error of judgment. In Hamlet, the ghost of his father tells him to revenge his death and In Oedipus; the oracle warns Oedipus about killing his father. Next, the reversal of fortune, in both tragedies leads to the death of their mothers. The anagnorisis of Hamlet was when he discovered how his father died and in Oedipus when the shepherd recognized Oedipus as the killer of Laius. The hubris overpowered both heroes, Hamlet for vengeance of his father’s death and Oedipus to revenge the death of Laius, which ironically was his real father, and he had killed him. Hamlet and Oedipus have the five characteristics of a tragic hero, the main characteristic that both share, is the error of judgment, however, their fate ...
Writing. Ed. Edgar V. Roberts, Ed. Henry E. Jacobs. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc., 2006. 110-15.
Pike, David L., & Acosta, Ana M. (2014). Literature: A World of Writing (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
Literature. Ed. Alison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. Portable 10th ed. New York: W. W. Norton,
Conway, J. (2003). Issues and Themes in Contemporary Writing ENG00401 Study Guide Semester Two 2003. Lismore: Southern Cross University.
Goldwasser, Amy. "What's the Matter with Kids Today." St. Martin's Guide to Writing. Vol. 9.