Oedipus Tragic Hero Essay

674 Words2 Pages

A tragic hero had a different meaning during the Aristotelian and Shakespearean era. To Aristotle, a tragic hero is neither a good or evil character, but rather a superior person who has human qualities and fallibility. The tragic hero leads to his or her own destruction by making an error in judgment or tragic flaw. In an Aristotelian tragedy, the main character does not die, but has other tragic consequences such as blindness or exile. Meanwhile, in an Elizabethan tragedy, the play ends in a tremendous catastrophe by revolving around the tragic hero who later dies. A tragic flaw is the sole purpose of the tragic hero’s downfall. In the end, an Elizabethan tragedy differs from Aristotelian tragedy in that it originally was a warning against dictatorship and political conflict.
Aristotle had a definition of a tragedy. According to him, a tragedy is a play that sticks to one serious and imperative issue to not confuse the audience. It should have good harmony and must be dramatized to entertain. A good tragedy will evoke pity and fear in its audience. The audience feels sorry for the tragic hero, but also feels fear as the main character moves towards his own destruction. In Oedipus the King, the story applies the principles of Aristotle.
The main character, Oedipus, is a man who is superior to the others. Not only does he have social class, but he …show more content…

Unfortunately, Macbeth tells Lady Macbeth about the prophecy that he will become King of Scotland. Lady Macbeth influenced and manipulated Macbeth to kill King Duncan to obtain the throne. After he killed the King, murdering people one after another was the only solution to maintain his reign of the people of Scotland. Macbeth’s tragic flaw, ambition, changed him completely. He became a person who was filled with greed, violence, and power hungry. Overall, all three factors led Macbeth to his

Open Document