Oedipus The King Kurt Fosso

433 Words1 Page

It is very clear that fate is a strong theme in Oedipus the King. The fate of killing his own father and marrying his widowed mom is so ironic because that is something he tried to avoid his whole life. He was told that he would grow up to kill his own father and marry his own mother by a prophet which in doubt lead him to do what he tried to avoid. It seems like everything Oedipus tried to avoid couldn't be helped because fate would lead him to do what he did not want to do. In an article/journal written by a teacher named Kurt Fosso. He has a debate on fate and whether is really played a role. He argues for one that “ he perhaps could have chosen not to investigate the old king’s murder, probable source of Thebes’s plague,” he perhaps could have chosen not to investigate the old king’s murder, probable source of Thebes plague,”. It is …show more content…

He made a point when he said “ word of his death reached Thebes, Oedipus the Sphinx-killer arrived and was crowned the new king, and, finally, the massacre’s eyewitness returned.” Now Kurt Fosso is making the argument on how one man could have killed Laius when he was not alone and how a mysterious survivor returned when Oedipus was crowned king. He believes Oedipus did not kill the king so therefore how can fate make him do something that has not be done by his hands. Finding this article on Essex County College database(Library EBSCO) was not easy because, I didn't come across many articles that really talked about the fate of Oedipus. Instead I found this article that argues the fate of Oedipus and how he could not have a played a part in Oedipus life. I understand where Kurt Fosso is coming from his argument but, from a reader's perspective it pretty hard to argue that fate did not play a role in oedipu life. Everything he tried to avoid eventually happened as if it was already written in stone for him to do what he did not want to

More about Oedipus The King Kurt Fosso

Open Document