Oedipus Perkins The Ironman Analysis

1197 Words3 Pages

Since Perkins’s wrote the homiletic handbook of his day, it is safe to assume that he followed the method he proposed therein. The purpose of this section is to determine if Perkin’s practiced his own homiletic laid out in The Art. As a result, those interested in the study of Perkins’s preaching will have a model of his method, a minor deficiency of The Art. Though Perkins’s definitely practiced the art of prophesying, few of his sermons exist. The main reason may be attributed to his belief and practice of delivery. Perkins’s held to a position that sermons should be extemporaneous. Furthermore, he dissuaded student from the memorization of manuscripts. Also, many of Perkins’s exegetical work and expositions were later compiled, edited, and published as commentaries. Therefore, the only extant sermon “An Exhortation to Repentance” will be analyzed. Perkins’s offered a summary of what preaching involved at the end of The Art. According to Perkins, Preaching involves: 1. Reading the text clearly from the canonical Scriptures. 2. Explaining the meaning of if, once is has been read, in the light of the Scriptures themselves. 3. Gathering a few profitable points of doctrine from the natural sense of the passage. 4. If the preacher is suitably gifted, applying the doctrines thus explained to the life and practice of …show more content…

Though he advised against the used of such devices, he argued that they might be used sparingly, appropriate to the matter at hand, brief, and for instruction. One of the two he used met all requirements. He used the illustration of traveling along a narrow bridge at night to illustrate the idea man is not able to discern his state of misery unless he first searches himself. At first this might have seemed out of place, however, considering the context, it makes perfect sense. Perkins was preaching at a buyer and sellers fair. Therefore, people would have been traveling along dangerous

Open Document