Occupational Ethnography Analysis

688 Words2 Pages

Characterization of peripheral arterial diseases can be broadly performed noninvasively and invasively by computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance (MR), digital subtraction angiography as well as Doppler ultrasonography (Stanford 2005). Invasive digital subtraction angiography has been classified as a gold standard method to evaluate the lower extremity vascular diseases (Ota et al 2004). However in a certain circumstances due to limitation of this technique it is seemly inapplicable for some cases. A 76 years old patient was requested for interventional angiography with clinical detail of peripheral arterial disease. Patient has rest pain with duration of 4 weeks. ABI (ankle brachial index) test showed a value less than 0.9 which indicates significant peripheral arterial diseases. Conventional angiogram was requested to confirm the location and degrees of stenosis before revascularisation. However, during the procedure, patient looked quite uncomfortable as he needed to maintain the access site straight …show more content…

It has been reported that sensitivity and specificity of CT angiogram was greater than 90% in detecting stenosis, calcification or occlusion (Suzuki & Tanaka 2013). Moreover Pollak et al (2012) has proved that the accuracy of diagnostic performance was greater than 95%, sensitivity of 99% and specificity at 97% and no evidences of decreased performance down to popliteocrural branches. Regardless of the location, accurate characteristics can be assessed in aortoiliac vessels with sensitivity 96%, and specificity 98%, femoropopliteal with sensitivity 97% and specificity 94%, and tibial arteries with sensitivity 95% and specificity 91%. Conventionally, the precise of evaluation in tibial disease is poorer than the aorta-iliac and femoral levels, particularly if vessels are heavily

Open Document