Obtaining New Knowledge: Historical Events

1185 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: History of science and technilogy

Knowledge that is acquired and accepted as true today is constantly changing. This is because we curious humans are always generating questions that spark the production of newly conceived ideas and theories. As Ralph Waldo Emerson said: “Men love to wonder, and that is the seed of science.” While these ideas may be accepted as relevant and reliable currently and can be useful tools for acquiring newer knowledge, it is easy to assume that pre-existing knowledge has been discarded. This is not always necessarily true, but rather that pre-existing knowledge is revisited and improved upon. With the areas of knowledge natural sciences and human sciences, knowledge is acquired through different ways, even though they are both classified as a science. With this, knowledge issues may arise within these two areas of knowledge in which a consideration of pertaining ways of knowing must be included. In the natural sciences, a knowledge issue that may stem from the statement of “That of which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow” is: “How can we justify that new knowledge always causes pre-existing knowledge to become discarded?” With the natural sciences, new knowledge is constantly being formulated by information based from the results of experiments and/or new discoveries. New knowledge in this area of knowing may interfere with already existing knowledge by making the pre-existing knowledge become less valid. As William Lawrence Bragg said: “The important thing in science is not so much to obtain new facts as to discover new ways of thinking about them.” A topic that came up in a past history class of mine regarded the times of Nicolas Copernicus and Gallileo. Nicolas Copernicus used reason and sense perception ... ... middle of paper ... ...e to access pre-existing knowledge, it assists us in understanding the development of new knowledge and the evolving process of how we got to that knowledge in which we accept today. So, pre-existing knowledge does not get discarded but instead becomes built upon to improve it and allows us to understand the processes in which we arrive at our knowledge. Works Cited Bingham, Jane et al. Book of Knowledge. London: Usborne Publishing, 2003. Print. Carter, J. Stein. “History of Biology.” Biology.clc.uc.edu. 8 Jan. 2014. Web. 17 Jan. 2014 “Key thinkers on the human sciences.” theoryofknowledge.net 2012. Web. 17 Jan. 2014 “Key thinkers on the natural sciences.” theoryofknowledge.net 2012. Web. 17 Jan. 2014 Moncur, Michael. “Science Quotes.”quotationspage.com 2013. Web. 26 Jan. 2014 “Quotes on the natural sciences.” theoryofknowledge.net 2012. Web. 26 Jan. 2014

Show More
Related

  • Linda Zagzebski: A Virtue Based Definition of Knowledge

    1062 Words  | 3 Pages

    How we approach the question of knowledge is pivotal. If the definition of knowledge is a necessary truth, then we should aim for a real definition for theoretical and practical knowledge. Methodology examines the purpose for the definition and how we arrived to it. The reader is now aware of the various ways to dissect what knowledge is. This entails the possibility of knowledge being a set of truths; from which it follows that one cannot possibly give a single definition. The definition given must therefore satisfy certain desiderata , while being strong enough to demonstrate clarity without losing the reader. If we base our definition on every counter-example that disproves our original definition then it becomes ad hoc. This is the case for our current defini...

    Read More

  • Andreas Vesalius

    1201 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...cam.ac.uk/ vesalius-great-work Accessed on 4/26/14) This approach is what incited a scientific revolution when it came to how new discoveries were made, and it challenged future generations to find out more about the world around them and correct old theories.

    Read More

  • Dante's Inferno: The Power Of Knowledge

    1956 Words  | 4 Pages

    Knowledge is a fundamental component of being human. The ability to comprehend information, apply it to the future as well as understand the past, is remarkable. Without knowledge, there could be no critical thinking, empathy, or technological progress. This is an incredible ingredient of our makeup that touches every aspect of human life, and arguably the ingredient that makes us human. The great scholars and philosophers have understood this for thousands of years and have documented as such in their works. From the Biblical Genesis, which is said to represent the first humans, to popular fables, Homer’s Odyssey, and Dante’s Inferno, this message is made clear. Knowledge is the key construct that defines man

    Read More

  • Theory Of Truth

    1306 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Natural Sciences explore the knowledge we gain through the physical world such as ch...

    Read More

  • Applying Socrates´ The Allegory of the Cave" to Life

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    For us to understand the importance of knowledge, we first have to understand what knowledge is. Knowledge can be given to us by experience with something new or it can be acquired through experience. There is always a purpose for acquiring the information. There is a saying that “knowledge is power.” If you think practically, then knowledge is definitely giving you power to dictate your direction in life.

    Read More

  • The Significance of 'The Library of Babel'

    1580 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...t find anything new. This description points out the hindrances on humans’ acquisition of knowledge because of our finite biological capacities.

    Read More

  • Is Knowledge Provisional Essay

    1297 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to evaluate the extent to which knowledge is provisional, one must first examine: when, if at all, does knowledge have to be discarded? In the sciences, many theories cannot be tested, and therefore cannot be proven true; however, they can be proven false and therefore discarded. Human scientists spend their lives attempting to understand human behavior and human phenomena. As time progresses and technology advances, they make new discoveries about humans. I discovered one example of this while studying addiction in my standard level psychology class. Over 50 years ago, psychopathologists, those who study mental disorders and that which is abnormal, acknowledged the abuse of alcohol, cocaine, amphetamines, and nicotine, amongst other substances, as addictions. This was based largely on the fact that the...

    Read More

  • To What Extent is Knowledge Provisional

    1335 Words  | 3 Pages

    Knowledge has a preliminary definition which is that it is justified true belief. Due to its dynamic nature, knowledge is subject to review and revision over time. Although, we may believe we have objective facts from various perceptions over time, such facts become re-interpreted in light of improved evidence, findings or technology and instigates new knowledge. This raises the questions, To what extent is knowledge provisional? and In what ways does the rise of new evidence give us a good reason to discard our old knowledge? This new knowledge can be gained in any of the different areas of knowledge, by considering the two areas of knowledge; History and Natural Sciences, I will be able to tackle these knowledge issues since they both offer more objective, yet regularly updated knowledge, which is crucial in order to explore this statement. I believe that rather than discarding knowledge we build upon it and in doing so access better knowledge, as well as getting closer to the truth.

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Scientific Knowledge and Other Types of Knowledge

    1407 Words  | 3 Pages

    After considering all the described points in this paper, it can be rightly said that there is a considerable difference between science and other types of knowledge.

    Read More

  • Pre-existing Knowledge

    1313 Words  | 3 Pages

    Albert Einstein said, “We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.” This new manner of thinking should be based on pre-existing knowledge. This pre-existing knowledge is necessary because it is the catalyst that pushes the human race forward, making us want to discover more. Trying to discover completely new knowledge would not yield the same results. Basing your research off what you already know allows you to compare the new data that you collected to the old data that is already present. If you discover something new you will have nothing to compare it with. This does not allow you the luxury of seeing if what you discovered was an improvement. This essay will examine how important it is to discover new ways of thinking about prior knowledge than it is to discover new facts. I believe that using prior knowledge to push discovery is much more important than trying to discovers new data or facts.

    Read More

  • The Pursuit of Knowledge

    1040 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ever wonder how the world would be today only if our great researchers implemented a different attitude towards their experiments? It is possible that the results would remain same. However, some argue that the consequences may be altered. Nonetheless, this does not make the earlier learned knowledge valued less or false, just supplementary. Abraham Maslow’s theory challenges nearly all ways of knowing, suggesting that if we limit our thinking, the outcomes remain homogenous, therefore, limiting the amount of knowledge we acquire. Dilemmas are mentioned in order to repudiate from the opinions that are profoundly accepted in the society. If Newton had eaten that apple, instead of using it as a tool to apply the theory of attraction, he may not have exposed gravity. Because he had more tools than a mere hammer and he was sagacious enough to expand his philosophy beyond hunger, he made such an innovation. It is widely claimed that inventions are accidental. In fact, all the chemical elements in the famous periodic table are a result of different tactics towards scientist’s research. As ToK teaches us that there is no possible end to a situation for it is influenced by the perceptive skills of the arguers. There is never a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ or the ‘ultimate answer’ in the conflict, but the eminence of rationalization is what poises the deliberation. This suggestion explains that there is always that one more way to approach the conclusion. Thus, pursuit of knowledge habitually requires dissimilar ways of knowing for it lengthens the verdict.

    Read More

  • Without Knowledge, Life Would be Worthless

    1960 Words  | 4 Pages

    The quest for scientific wisdom does not progress too far; rather, it is merely at the origin of upgrading society. Because knowledge is a concept most important to the establishment of any society, it is the building block of the future. Without knowledge, there would be no means of advancement, for society would lack the potential to do so. In other words, human society is on the verge of experiencing, processing and making use of the vast amount of knowledge present and on the brink of exposu re. Dante Alighiere adequately states, "Consider your origin; you were not born to live like brutes, but to follow virtue and knowledge" (125:30). He is right, in his reasoning, for wisdom leads individuals to more productive and civilized liv es. Although intellect is helpful in improving one's status in society, everyone does not view rank as the sole purpose of expressing one's wisdom. Along with placement in society as an individual, the improvement of society as a whole is also considere d when making use of knowledge. Scientific comprehension is applied to several aspects of society, from the deep earth to the inevitable skies, in a suitable manner throughout the United States. It should be implemented in a way as to solve problems and enhance human existence both physically and mentally. In other words, knowledge preserves and enhances the idea of "the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness;" knowledge should lead each individual to a better life, provide grea ter liberty and forsee enhanced happiness. With their extensive knowledge, researchers are able to develop and improve medicines which will provide people with access to a better life. B...

    Read More

  • Scientific Revolution Essay

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    Scholasticism and the European universities of the past had mainly taught from old commentaries and studies and had not been interested in trying to gather new information. Many scholars had come to the conclusion that there was no new knowledge to be gained from nature. During the Age of Discovery and the following Scientific Revolution, however, this old authority was all but destroyed. The 'new world ' of the Americas and Australia were first found and studied during this time, filling Europe with knowledge of new plants, animals, and people groups. Some of the greatest amounts of new knowledge, though, came not from the ocean, but from the sky. The newly invented telescope, first made by Galileo, opened up a vast sea of never-before-seen information about the planets, their surfaces, and their movements. By proving that nature still had abundant information to be discovered, the Scientific Revolution went against the old Scholastic

    Read More

  • Division Between Ancient and Modern Science

    2594 Words  | 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss differences in motives which have driven ancient and modern science, arguing that 17th century alterations of power structures led to the ultimate division between modern and ancient science and the eruption of modern science as it is today. Comparisons will be drawn regarding knowledge accessibility, prevailing philosophies and ideologies, and the relationship between science and the church.

    Read More

  • Social and Natural Sciences

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Lowe, knowledge requires a form of action to be accurate and precise. In other words, knowledge is created on the basis of a rationally conceived design such as an experiment. Experiments are a great example of how action is required to produce or replicate knowledge. Moreover, one necessitates research and a rational design to attain certainty in his or her knowledge claim. Generally, this certainty may be achieved with an experiment. Natural sciences may be referred to as a science of the physical world, whereas a social science may be defined as a branch of science dealing with human society and relationships. Furthermore, social sciences and natural science may be distinguished by the method of their creation. In general, natural sciences usually require a form of action (i.e. experiment) to provide justification for their knowledge claims whereas social sciences don’t require action to justify their knowledge claims. An example of a method that doesn’t require action may be a case study. One may wonder which method is more reliable and accurate. A knowledge questions that arises from this situation is: To what extent is action required to justify knowledge. In this essay, I am going to examine the extent at which action is required to justify a knowledge claim. By taking both natural and social sciences into consideration. By taking personal experiences and relevant knowledge issues into account, this essay will discuss several aspects regarding the knowledge question.

    Read More

More about Obtaining New Knowledge: Historical Events

Open Document