Question 1: Relations between the United States and North Korea have been hostile since the two states fought on opposite sides in the Korean War. However, since North Korea has acquired nuclear capability, the fear of conflict has escalated, as have threats from both sides; recent statements by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson indicate that the U.S. may be willing to take preemptive action against the isolationist Asian nation. Max Fisher’s March 19 article “Multiple Options for Striking North Korea, All Highly Risky” from The New York Times explores three possible routes the United States can take pre-emptively in regards to the threats posed by North Korea. The international, state, and individual levels of analyses provide context and understanding to this conflict and provide recommendations of how the two states must approach it to prevent further …show more content…
According to Fisher’s article, United States action in North Korea could be devastating for Japan and South Korea, key U.S. allies in Asia (Fisher 1, Tribune News Services). Because of alliances with South Korea and Japan, the United States’ response to North Korea will have implications for these other states, especially since the U.S. is debating preemptive strikes to defend them (Fisher 1). Additionally, realists in international relations theory maintain that alliances are key to the international system because they maintain balance and stability (Morgenthau 127, Mingst and Arreguín-Toft 111). While the United States has many strong allies, North Korea is largely isolationist, only allied with Russia and China (Ramani). Alliances depend on common goals and cooperation, which impacts state behavior, and as is the case with the conflict between the U.S. and North
To begin with, the foreign policies that affected the United States during the 1950s and 1960s include: “containment,” “brinkmanship,” and “domino theory.” The concept of “containment” involved utilizing “firm” military, economic, and diplomatic tactics to halt the proliferation of communism, improve United States’ national security, and augment worldwide influence. In supplement of “containment,” U.S. involvement in Korea provided an example of how “containment” influenced the decision to enter the country. With China falling to communism at the hands of Mao Zedong, Korea was the next to become “infected.” Subsequently, Korea underwent a physical division, which resulted in the communist state of North Korea and the now vulnerable South Korea. Urgent to unify Korea as a communist nation, North Korea invaded South Korea and war broke out. In the midst of this, the United States had seen China fall to communism and now h...
Italo Calvino was an Italian author who wrote a wide variety of stories, such as The Nonexistent Knight and many more. He was a master of postmodern literature which can be seen throughout all his stories, including The Nonexistent Knight. This novella follows Agilulf, a “perfect” yet nonexistent knight, and his acquaintances on quests to seek out their true identity and reveals to us that “where other people exist genuine individuality is never possible.” Through Calvino’s perspective, the perfect individual cannot exist in a world where there is greed, gluttony, lust, and other inimical qualities around him, which ultimately led Agilulf to his doom. Characters in the story cannot achieve that “perfect individuality” that everyone desires, simply because perfection is unattainable, which is depicted through Calvino’s use of satire and postmodern elements. In The Nonexistent Knight, Italo Calvino creates a parodic satire on medieval romances where genuine individuality is not possible, making us question the verisimilitude of the characters in the story through the use of different types of satire, character development, and postmodern themes.
The Vietnam War is one of the most controversial subjects in American politics. The US went to the war under the guise of the domino effect, as they believed that if Vietnam fell, the surrounding countries would fall as well. President Johnson said “If you let a bully come into your garden, the next day he’ll be on your porch, and the day after that he’ll rape your wife” One thing that is not controversial is that we lost the war. Lots of different factors contributed to the United States unsuccessful trip to Vietnam. Among many reasons, one of the two biggest factors in the lose of the war was America’s foreign policy how and how bad the US underestimated how important freedom and independence was to the people of Vietnam. On top of that the US used the wrong military strategy, instead of focusing on limiting collateral damage the US used heavy artillery that killed citizens and alienated would be supporters. There was political corruptness in South Vietnam governments, which meant that they could not build an alternative to the NLF. At home, the public opinion of the war was decreasing at a constant rate and demonstrations were at an all time high. Everything that could go wrong did go wrong, and these problems all contributed to a Vietnam tour that went horribly wrong and an attitude among the American people that was growing ever doubt full of their government.
THE COLD WAR The Cold War was a very complex war. Many ideas, conflicts and emotions were going on. This was a major turning point in the world of war. War is a much more powerful word.
This resolution made by the United Nations states that it might be necessary to repel the attack made by North Korea and unite the country creating stability.... ... middle of paper ... ... In regard to the low risk of Soviet and Chinese intervention, it should also be known that due to the desire to not start another World War, and the lack of indications of actual intervention from China, these risks are worth it. If America was to proceed in such a way as to never take risks, then America would never move forward.
Since the end of the Korean War, the United States has enacted policies to isolate and undermine the Kim Dynasty in North Korea. A key development took place in the past several decades where North Korea broke away from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to develop their own nuclear weapons and while lacking launch capabilities, they have been successful in their development. During this process, the United States took active policies to deter the North Koreans in pursuit of their goals. It is easy to assume that the United States took this stance in order to maintain a military edge in the region. But under closer examination, this neo-realist perspective does not explain why the United States pursued this policy. In reality, North Korea to this day does not pose a significant military threat, even with limited nuclear capabilities. A constructivist perspective is more able to explain US policy in this instance because it does not focus on sheer militaristic power. It takes into consideration the state's identities which drives their interests. The identities of the US and North Korea and the interactions between them drove both nations to the point of acquiring and deterring nuclear use.
Richard Peters and Xiaobing Li’s Voices from the Korean War, is a book published on the accounts of individuals that were involved on all sides of the Korean War. The Korean War personally seems to have been a war that could have been won only through the start of another World War. The Korean War was a war fought to unite the Korean peninsula as a unified Communist controlled country under the rule of Kim Il Sung, backed by the U.S.S.R and China. Once the involvement of the United States became necessary the South Korean and American Forces began their offensive to defend South Korea against communism. Accounts given from all sides of the war allows us to receive a perspective of the conditions and view points from both sides of the Korean
Korean War Veterans memorial can be seen in Washington D.C and is located in Potomac Park which is near other landmarks such as the Lincoln memorial and the reflecting pool by the national mall. This amazing memorial commemorates and preserves the memory of those who bravely served in the Korean War. The original team of architects from Pennsylvania state university who had won the initial design/concept competition later chose to disband because several changes would have had to been made that not only pleased the advisory board but the agency of the commission of fine arts as well. A court case on the federal level was filed and lost concerning some of the changes that were to be made to the memorial site. The design that is well known today is the work of talented Cooper-Lecky architects who also collaborated with many other designers. The start of construction was put underway by President George W. H. Bush on June 14th 1992 also known as flag day and was finished on July 27th 1995 which also happened to be the 42nd anniversary of the armistice that ended the
Relations between the United States and North Korea have been unstable since the second world war and with each passing decade the relations have become more tense. The U.S has never have formal international relations with North Korea , however the conflict has caused much controversy in U.S foreign policy. North Korea has been the receiver of millions of dollars in U.S aid and the target of many U.S sanctions. This is due to the fact that North Korea is one of the most oppressive regimes on the planet, that uses unjust techniques such as murder, torture, and starvation to get their citizens to be obedient. They restrict contact from their citizens to the outside world, through censorship of technology and rarely allowing visitors to the country. The root of the US-North Korea conflict however ,has been on the basis of nuclear weapons and North Korea threatening to use those weapons against the U.S and neighboring South Korea. The U.S and other nations have been working for the last few decades to stop the regime from purchasing and utilizing destructive nuclear weapons.
[The US and North Korea have been in a political feud since the 1950s. The US has been like a ´big brother´ to South Korea, during the Korean War. As for the US, hatred was standing upon them from North Korea, because the US helped out the South. During the Korean War, 1.6 million civilians were killed from both the North and South. The US supported South Korea, because the US couldn’t let the USSR, or Soviet Union, and Communism to spread.
Moreover, according to the same theory, relations among states are derived primarily by their level of power, which constitutes basically their military and economic capability, and in pursuit of the national security states strive to attain as many resources as possible. The theoretical model explains thus why the nuclear issue has eventually resulted in identifying with a security one, meaning that North Korea main concern is to assure its survivor, its efforts are in the first place finalized at meeting that target and its only means of pursuing it consists of the posing of the nuclear threat. North Korea finds itself stuck in an economic and, to some extent, diplomatic isolation; even though the financial sanctions leading to the just mentioned critical conditions have been caused by the government inflexible, aggressive and anti-democratic behavior, the regime has no other choice than restate and strengthen its strict and, apparently, definitive positions to ensure its survivor, since at the moment any concession or move toward a more liberal approach breaking the countrys isolation could easily cause a collapse of the whole system.... ... middle of paper ...
Since its origin in 1948, North Korea has been isolated and heavily armed, with hostile relations with South Korea and Western countries. It has developed a capability to produce short- and medium-range missiles, chemical weapons, and possibly biological and nuclear weapons. In December 2002, Pyongyang lifted the freeze on its plutonium-based nuclear weapons program and expelled IAEA inspectors who had been monitoring the freeze under the Agreed Framework of October 1994. As the Bush administration was arguing its case at the United Nations for disarming Iraq, the world has been hit with alarming news of a more menacing threat: North Korea has an advanced nuclear weapons program that, U.S. officials believe, has already produced one or two nuclear bombs. As the most recent standoff with North Korea over nuclear missile-testing approaches the decompression point, the United States needs to own up to a central truth: The region of Northeast Asia will never be fully secure until the communist dictatorship of North Korea passes from the scene. After threatening to test a new, long-range missile, Pyongyang says it is willing to negotiate with "the hostile nations" opposing it. But whether the North will actually forgo its test launch is anyone's guess. North Korea first became embroiled with nuclear politics during the Korean War. Although nuclear weapons were never used in Korea, American political leaders and military commanders threatened to use nuclear weapons to end the Korean War on terms favorable to the United States. In 1958, the United States deployed nuclear weapons to South Korea for the first time, and the weapons remained there until President George Bush ordered their withdrawal in 1991. North Korean government stateme...
After the First World War that led to death of millions of people, many countries decided to put measures to avoid any future conflict. The League of Nations in the 1920s came up with the idea of collective security where countries acting together would discourage aggression and act to stop the aggressor. This did not work out well as countries failed to agree on common policies. As a result, appeasement was considered. It was a policy that was adopted by the British government in the1930s. It was formulated from the belief that some countries such as Germany were unfairly treated in the Versailles treaty of 1918-1919. Adolf Hitler came into power in Germany on January 1933 after exploiting the depression-afflicted economy and the vehement popular resentment against Versailles treaty. The Nazi leader started by alarming the diplomats on his hatred towards the parliamentary system of governance and democratic government. The policy of appeasement had good intentions, but failed to put measures against aggression by the Germany government, which eventually led to World War 2.
In the last four decades, the Republic of South Korea has accomplished a high level of economic growth and global integration to develop into a high tech industrialized market. This economic growth has permitted the nation’s rise from the results of the Korean War and into the ranks of the Organization for Cooperation and Development (OECD). In today’s world South Korea is consider the world’s 12th largest economy and the United States 7th largest trading partner. In the next few paragraphs, I’ll discuss several of South Korea’s capabilities, opportunities, requirements and vulnerabilities that allowed for the countries rapid economic growth.
A nation’s innovation system is shaped by how the nation leverages its endowments—natural resources, culture, history, geography, and demographics—through policies that create a thriving market-oriented economy and accelerate the transition of new technologies, processes, and services to the market (Branscomb and Auerswald 2002). The aim of this assignment is to evaluate South Korea’s innovation policies, in light of its latest ranking as the second most innovative country in the world.