Normative Heteronormativity Essay

727 Words2 Pages

By analyzing the concept of normative heteronormativity, it has become clearer with the use of Adams’ readings, that our discourses and practices of heteronormativity are reinforcing and normalizing the known concept of the normalized behavior of heterosexuals in our society. Adam’s argues that “homosexualities and hetereosexualitites are dichotomized”. (p.59) In sense, there can be no heterosexuality from which homosexuality can differ from: there can’t be on without the other. She argues that society pushes the normalization of having a heterosexual relationship as being categorized as a healthy relationship, while a homosexual intimacy is seen as an “abnormal or perved appetite toward the opposite sex.”(p.60) With this perception, Adam’s
The readings from Chenier positively supports Adam’s argument of how our society heterosexual concept of moral integrity is insistent the practice of modern normative heteronormativity. As a new mother, Chenier wanted to raise her daughter against heteronormative norms and decided to bring up her daughter in a homosexual matter; because she believed that family upbringing has an effect on our sexuality. In her parenting quest, Chenier’s fellow friends did not believe that what she was doing was right and that she was imposing immoral values on her daughter and were “concerned that [her] biased ideals will ultimately restrict her natural development” (p.78), of her daughter. The moral integrity of Chenier’s friends believed that raising her child in a homosexual way, which
Pharrs’ readings are examples of an effort to resist this heteronormative normalization of heterosexuality for women with the concept of lesbian batting. The concept of ‘lesbian batting’ is the act of classifying other women as a lesbian, based on certain perceived behaviours that don’t seem feminine or women like. (p114) Unlike, Adams’ and Chenier’s beliefs, Pharr acknowledges that our society is normalizing heteronormative relationships, yet emphasize that it’s also normalizing homonormative intimacies through this act of batting. Lesbian batting is resistance towards Adam’s belief because this act of batting is normalizing lesbians throughout a heteronormative dialogue. Though the action of lesbian batting is used as an insult towards strong women who “resist[s] male dominance and control”, (p.114), this labeling is an acknowledgment of homosexuality through our heteronormative society. Unlike, what Adam’s was arguing that society shapes homosexuality as abnormal; Pharr’s switches this abnormal perception, to a declaration of acceptance in heteronormative actions. To continue, being a heterosexual female does not ultimately lead women to a safe passage through adolescence, since lesbian batting is not stigmatized to one’s sexuality (p.114) Thus, the concept of the Panopticon theory, (the act of self-policing one-self for the male gaze) comes into play; because though society acknowledges and

Open Document