Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American protests during the Vietnam War
The US civil rights movement
Vietnam war antiwar movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American protests during the Vietnam War
The 1960s and early 1970s were a complicated era were young adults offered serious critique about major aspects of the nation. In 1960s and 1970s, students were involved in movements like the civil rights movement, the anti-Vietnam War movement, and the women’s movement. In essence, those movements reformed the government policy and changed almost every American life today.During the 1960s and early 1970’s students protesters sought to fix issues they endured in society. For instance, the student protesters aimed to gain more democracy. Nonetheless, it is not very easy to just demand aspects and hope they will come true. Furthermore, those student protestors faced problems and obstacles. In attempt of facing issues they choose nonviolence …show more content…
as their tactic, “good will triumph evil” was their mentally. Some of the protestors goals was to stop the American involvement in the Vietnam War, gain equal rights for African Americans, women, and gays. While dealing with issues from society and government, many protestors choose nonviolence as their strategy.
the Statement of Purpose written by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee they stated, “We affirm the philosophical and religious ideal of nonviolence as the foundation of our purpose, the presupposition of our faith, and the manner of our action”(Document A). Students wanted to fight for change and justice through direct action. The students in 1960s understood that violence will give them negative attention from society and in such time they needed all the support they can earn from society. Additionally, students were heavily inspired by the Civil Rights Movement. The students recognized that some right were being granted to African Americans without the use of violence. “Peace dominates war; faith reconciles doubt” (Document A). As a result, they were inspired to use similar concepts, such as: rallies, marches, and …show more content…
sit-ins. A problem the students had in the 1960s was the involvement in the Vietnam War. The United States originally got involved because they feared that if South Vietnam were defeated communism would spread tremendously. In that era communism was a fear and concern of majority of Americans and the possibility of Southeast Asia being communist terrified Americans. On the other hand, students were highly concerned about draft and having to be forced to fight when some did not want to. In essence, the draft was a long term issue that student protestors had to combat. the Port Huron statement which is a political manifesto of students activists movements state “As we grew, however, our comfort was penetrated by events too troubling to dismiss” (Document B). The students were not in favor of their freedom being taken away when joining the army. As an illustration, Students went as far as to burning their draft cards to show their opposition. Moreover, the students did not support the war so they protested against hoping the draft will end and the war in general. A long term problem for the student protestors was earning justice in schools especially in universities.
The students explained that not only the small elite should have a voice in what happens in our society, they wanted everyone to feel represented. Furthermore, they wanted every citizen to come in unity and work on achieving change locally and nationwide. Herbert A. Deane once stated,“The new student attitude… seems to reject the state, the legal system, political parties, churches, colleges, and universities, and seems to deny objective standards of excellence in literature, the arts, and morals” (Document D). In other words, students were rejecting the policies set by schools and hoping to get people attention to
listen. In addition, students were exhausted of the school officials placing numerous restrictions. In a newsletter issued in 1964 it states, “ The source of our strength is, very simply, the fact that we are human beings and so cannot be forever treated as raw materials” (Document C). Moreover, students wanted the right of freedom speech and less restrictions. In an article called Why we strike it states, “The people who are affected by an illegitimate institution have the right to change it” (Document E). The article summarizes how outraged students were and what they had to do to get their point across. For instance, students had to take over buildings to emphasize their point of views. In conclusion, throughout the 1960s and 1970s the students faced numerous issues to get their point across. Nevertheless, the student protestors were successful in achieving a lot. Some of the movements that occurred and had great impact on the nation are the the Anti-Vietnam Movement, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Women’s Movement. The student protestors brought real change in our nation. They were able to impact and change our nation through nonviolence mentality. Lastly, the 1960s and 1970s student protestors shaped our nation and without them our lives would be completely different.
Nowadays, this concept of using nonviolence is hard to achieve. This is because people think that peaceful protest aren’t effective compared to taking action with their hands. One example is the Blacks Lives Matter Movement. Although there are peaceful protest, there are times when people turn violent against police. This can be counterintuitive since watching these harsh actions by protestors, people start forming negative views about the organization. This leads to people not supporting the cause anymore. Without the support of the public, an organization can’t
During the 1960’s, there was a rising tide of protests that were taking place. College students began to stand up for their rights and protest for a stronger voice in society. The United States was going through a tough period marked by the Cold War against communism and also the war in Vietnam. From Truman to Nixon the United States government involved the country more and more in Vietnam. Nixon announced a new policy in 1968 called Vietnamization. (Foner, 4th edition, pg.1028) This policy would bring American troops back home, but it neither limited the war nor ended the antiwar movements.
The 1960’s was a time society fantasized of a better world. However, the horrors of the Vietnam War soon became evident; the mass amounts of death occurring because of the war became a reality. It created a “movement”, especially in American colleges, in order to stand up for what they believed to be “right”. By 1970, many Americans believed sending troops to Vietnam was a mistake, however there were also various individuals becoming increasingly critical of the student antiwar movement
Utilizing paradox, Chavez describes the effectiveness of nonviolent protest to his audience. Recalling the achievements of MLK, Chavez claims that King “learned how to successfully fight hatred and violence with the unstoppable power of nonviolence.” This quote demonstrates
By using diction and repetition, Cesar Chavez emphases the need to use nonviolence during moments of injustice. The rhetorical choices made in this argument draw forth feelings of understanding and cause the readers to think deeper into Chaves' point of view. The purpose is to carry a message that shows the power of nonviolence and what it brings to the world. People quickly follow the straight, bloody path of force and violence, rather than thinking deeper in search for the winding yet cleaner path. As human beings, we crave the freedom and power we believe was bestowed upon us by God. We will fight tooth and nail, even threw the deaths of many, in order to achieve these trivial things.
In the article, published on the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez invokes the ideas of Dr. King and advocates for nonviolent resistance. Utilizing a determined tone throughout, he asserts that nonviolence will accomplish the goals of civil rights activists. By using contrasting diction to distinguish nonviolent action and violent action, he is able to reason for nonviolent virtues. With the use of rhetorical strategies, Chavez is able to drive his argument for nonviolent resistance. Chavez begins by recalling the power of nonviolence as demonstrated by Dr. King, who lived and taught essential ingredients for active nonviolence until the day he died.
In Cesar Chavez’s article “He Showed us the Way”, Chavez talks about Martin Luther King’s practices, how he stands with his nonviolent teachings and how king believed hate cannot driven out hate. Chavez explains how being nonviolent helped many members of the Civil Rights Movement get what they wanted. Throughout the article, Chavez uses religious and historical allusion, to show how nonviolence can be the best route to achieve what they want.
In Cesar Chavez’s article, he uses many rhetorical devices to help give the reader a better understanding of how important nonviolence vs violence is. Chavez explains how Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi have endowed reasons of nonviolence worth following.
The 1960’s was a happening decade. It was a time when many people came together for a common good and stood against injustice. The 60’s is often recalled as the era of the peace sign, one ridden with hippies, marijuana and pacifism. While true of much of the era, some of the movements calling for immense social change began as non-violent harbingers of change and later became radicals. The reason for this turn to radicalism, as seen in the case of the Students for a Democratic Society, and as suggested by the change between this organizations earlier Port Huron statement and the later Weatherman Manifesto, is due to the gradual escalation of the Vietnam war.
Our struggle is not easy, and we must not think of nonviolence as a safe way to fight oppression, the strength of nonviolence comes from your willingness to take personal risks in Kohlberg’s moral stage 5 moral rights and social contract is explained in this political analysis on governmental power and the antiapartheid and central America work when they led protest on campuses with hundreds being arrested and 130 campus withdrawals.
The Peacemakers came about because all powerful Europe was in the ruins after the Great War. The time of the Great War was a devastating time to the people. It lasted only four years, but in those four years millions died all over the world: soldiers, civilians, etc. They lived to experience the deaths of millions. They hoped that times like these would never occur again.
Peaceful protests were the most prominent form of civil rights activities during the sixties, and often proved successful, given time. “Peaceful but relentless protest was more effective than violent action” (Lindop 30), the legendary civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. argued. One form of this protest manifested itself through James Farmer, who formed the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE for short), conceived the bril...
In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of the Brown v. the Board of Education. This was a very historical moment because their ruling eliminated, the "separate but equal " doctrine. Their ruling called for school integration, although most school were very slow in complying if they complied at all. The NAACP, National Association for the Advancement of Color People, viewed this ruling as a success. The schools lack of the obedience toward this ruling, made it necessary for black activism to make the federal government implement the ruling, and possibly help close the racial gap that existed in places other than public schools. During one of the boycotts for equality, a leader emerged that would never be forgotten. Dr. Martin Luther King, who was leader of the Montgomery bus boycott, quickly became the spokesperson for racial equality. He believed that the civil rights movement would have more success if the black people would use non violent tactics. Some say he was adopting the style of Ghandi. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, SCLC, was formed by King and other activist in 1957. They were a group of black ministers and activist who agreed to try and possibly help others see the effects of a non violent movement. Also following the strategies set by the SCLC, a group known as the SNCC or the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, began a string of sit-in and campaigns as the black population continued it's fight for equality. It was the undying efforts of the two groups that paved the way for the march on Washington. This march which drew a crowd of at least 200,000, was the place that Dr. King, gave his famous "dream speech." Both the SNCC, and the SCLC were victims of lots of threats and attempted attacks, yet they continued to pursue freedom in a non violent fashion. However near the late 60's they had another problem on their hands. There was a group of activist known as the Black Panthers who were not so eager to adopt the non-violent rule. The believed that the civil rights movement pushed by Dr. King and is non-violent campaign, which was meant to give blacks the right to vote and eliminate segregation, was not solving problems faced in poor black communities. This Black Panther group, stabled the term "black power", which was used a sort of uplifting for the black self esteem.
Cesar Chavez in an excerpt from an article published in the magazine of a religious organization asserted that nonviolence is a more effective method of resistance than violence. Chavez supports his assertion by introducing a poignant juxtaposition of violence and peaceful methods, then he employs an effectual allusion to a past peaceful civil rights leader, and finally he presents a compelling logical appeal to the audience about the consequences of violent retaliation. The author’s purpose is to persuade the audience to protest injustice through peaceful methods in order to avoid physical harm and gain public support. The author utilizes an urgent tone for all of society, specifically members of the farm worker’s movement.
The Antiwar movement of the 70’s was front page news and happening all across the nation Guy said. He also said that this was the first time the youth in society began to seek, act, and unite for social change in America. These youth were tired of the Vietnam war and the unfair practices of the military draft of the 1970’s. These protests also turned violent. The violent protests created a great sense of division within American society. In today’s society, we still see the effects of youth protests. At college campuses across the nation, youth are forming and organizing groups and protests with the goal of social change. These youth protests originated from the successes of anti war movements in the 70’s. I think in the future, the society will begin to lose the norm of youth protests. I think the older generations will begin to lose the respect for the youth as the trend of youth taking longer to self-sufficient continues. This will cause fewer successful youth protests in the