Non-lethal weapons are also termed as pain-inducing weapons, compliance weapons, non-deadly weapons or less-lethal weapons. These weapons are less likely to exterminate a target as compared to the conventional weapons. In addition, non-lethal weapons are preferred in situations to limit the intensification of any conflict where lethal force is undesirable or prohibited. These weapons are also used where rules policies restrict the use of lethal weapons or where minimum causalities are required. Moreover, non-lethal weapons are primarily used by military police, United Nations forces and forces responsible for stability operations and peacekeeping. Additionally, some military forces utilize these weapons to channelize the battlefield, control …show more content…
The area denial weapons are further classified as anti-vehicle and anti-personnel weapons. These weapons include caltrops and active denial system. Caltrops are basically cluster of sharp objects placed at the boundaries of the restricted areas. Active denial systems emit electromagnetic radiation which penetrates the human skin and the nervous system of the victim responses with a feeling of heat. The non-lethal ammunitions includes rubber bullets, ring airfoil projectiles, beanbag rounds, plastic bullets, wax bullets and rubber bullets equipped with electroshock effect. Non-lethal explosives encompass grenades with chemical irritants, sting grenades equipped with rubber shrapnel and flashbang grenades (stun grenades). The gases and sprays used as non-lethal weapons are water cannons, malodorants (scent-based weapons), pepper spray, tear gas, mace spray, sleep gas, blister agents, dibenzoxazepine gas, 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile, pelargonic acid vanillylamide (PAVA). Additionally, some psychochemical weapons such as 3-Quinuclidinyl benzilate, Lysergic acid diethylamide, Kolokol-1 and EA-3167 are used during interrogation or combats. The direct energy non-lethal weapons include sonic weapons, particle beam weapons, laser weapons and electromagnetic
The Use of the TASER in the Police Force. The use of conducted energy weapons in the police force has become increasingly popular since they were introduced only a short while ago. The TASER is claimed to be the safest and most productive type of less lethal force in use today, with a very quick recovery rate and no long term side effects. The TASER has quickly taken over the harsh use of pepper spray, the brutal force of the baton and in some cases the firearm.
Like other law enforcement agencies throughout the United States, New Jersey has a policy that addresses police use of force. The New Jersey Attorney General’s Use of Force Policy was first put into operation in April 1985. The purpose of the policy is to serve as a guide for police officers who are confronted with use of force situations during their duty to preserve the law and protect others. This essay will provide a summary of the policies and practices of New Jersey’s Use of Force Policy. An evaluation of these components will be presented with emphasis on the legal sufficiency of the policies and procedures. Policy strengths and weaknesses will be identified in addition to suggestions for improvement. This essay will conclude with examples and the associated issues of less-than-lethal technologies (“Use of Force,” 2000).
Most law enforcement agencies have policies that determine the use of force needed. The policies describe the escalating series of actions an officer can take to resolve a situation, first level is officer presence which means no force is used, and just the mere presence can reduce
weapons are included and there is a higher threat component and additionally general society wrongdoing rate are all ecological variables. Inside, regulatory workings, police association, and typical practices all can effectsly affect an officer's choice too. Two shooting sorts are recognized, "non-elective and elective." (White, 1999) "Non-elective shootings are seen as an officer utilizing lethal power to secure against risk of prompt genuine damage or demise. As the measure of peril confronting the officer diminishes, choices to utilize lethal power turn out to be more elective." (White, 1999)
A '''use of force continuum''' is a standard that affords law enforcement officials & security officers (police, probation, or corrections) with guidelines as to how much use of force may be used against a repelling subject in a given situation. In certain ways it is similar to the military’s escalation of force. The reason of these models is to clarify, both for officers and citizens, the complex subject of use of force by law officers. They are often vital parts of law enforcement agencies' use of force policies. Although various agencies have developed different models of the continuum, there is no universal standard model (Stetser, 2001, p. 36)
This essay will aim to explore the controversial issue in regards to whether more police officers should be armed with Tasers. This essay will argue that more officers should not be equipped with Tasers, also known as “Conducted Energy Weapons” (CEWs), and that the issuing of Tasers by police services should be limited to supervisors and specialized tactical units until further research has been conducted on the effects that Tasers have on the human body. Furthermore the abuse of Tasers by police officers will also be argued as another reason why officers should not be armed with Tasers.
"Federation of American Scientists :: Types of Chemical Weapons." Federation of American Scientists. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2010.
used in the best possible way but if used the wrong way it could damage your life or even kill
...using chemical sprays or projectiles implanted with chemicals, such as pepper spray. Officers may also use “Conducted Energy Devices, CEDS” to control an individual, these weapons are usually known as Tasers. Tasers release a high-voltage jolt of electricity from a distance. A good situation in which law enforcement officers use this guideline is when they are trying to control riots. Using less-lethal technologies officers may be able to control a large group, if they are not able to restrain them then officers will be left to use blunt impact, chemicals such as tear gas or pepper spray, or even conducted energy devices until they are able to get ahold of the situation
This includes riot shields, tear gas, and rubber bullets. If necessary, police officers have access to military weapons.
Police use of force can be described as being the "amount of effort required by police to compel compliance by an unwilling subject.”(nij.gov, p.1) The stages of force police use are simple verbal and physical restraint, less lethal force and lethal force. Police officers are encouraged to use only enough force necessary to control a situation, arrest the person, or protect themselves or others from harm (p.1). When a situation begins to spiral out of control for the police officers, the next level should be used in order to gain control.
Mesloh, C., Henych, M., & Wolf, R. (2008, September). Less lethal weapon effectiveness, use of force, and suspect & officer injuries: A five-year analysis. Retrieved Nov. 22, 2014, from National Criminal Justice Reference Service: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/224081.pdf
In 1784, someone using a flintlock pistol shot Edward Culshaw. In those days, there were no bullets, as we know them. Gunpowder and a ball of lead were put into the gun’s muzzle and packed with paper wadding. A spark made when the gun’s hammer struck some flint at the back end of the barrel ignited the powder. When the constable examined Culshaw’s wound, he found a piece of newspaper used as wadding to pack the powder in the killer’s gun. The prime suspect in the killing was a man named John Toms. When a piece of newspaper found in Toms’ pocket was compared with the piece found in the wound, the pieces fit together like two pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Based on the evidence, Toms was easily convicted. The Toms case was probably the first in America in which ballistics was used to solve a crime.
I will focus on the main non-lethal weapons used; The taser, bean bag gun, and pepper spray. In this essay I will compare and contrast the uses of non-lethal weapons. Also in this essay, I will review the instances, production, and damage of non-lethal weapons. Non-lethal weapons are weapons used by police to subdue rioters and criminals. They are also known as less-lethal weapons in some parts of the world.
Stereotypes -Adults With Disabilities When others see a disabled adult most people are assuming the worst and think they cannot do anything for themselves. Misconceptions is really bigger on this topic, because a lot of adults that are disabled are judged by the way they are. You can look at someone who is disabled and think the worst when in reality it is not that bad. People for years now think that if you are disabled in any way that you are not capable to do things on your own or do anything a nondisabled person can do which in some cases some cannot but most can. People who are disabled are a major stereotype just because of the way they are, one stereotype can be that they are weak.