Noah Berlatsky's '12 Years A Slave'

763 Words2 Pages

Noah Berlatsky states “12 years a Slave” gets history right by getting it wrong. Personally, I don’t believe this is the case. Noah Berlatsky proposes in his statement above that even though some of the material in the movie is not true and are not included in Northup’s autobiography, it still gets history right because the overall movie is still an accurate account of American slavery. I oppose his statement because if critical information provided from a man who was involved in slavery is missing, how accurate can the movie possibly be? Steve McQueen’s movie fails to explain the complete findings of slavery such as found in the autobiography of Solomon Northup. “12 years a Slave” does not get history right by getting it wrong as displayed …show more content…

It is quite obvious that no former free man or any man truly wanted to be a slave, in fact the slaves would usually do as much as they could in their power to escape, or plead for their freedom. In my opinion, the movie doesn’t show enough of this, there are no instances where a slave tries to escape the Epps‘ plantation. Also, when the slaves are travelling by ship to New Orleans there is conflict between one of the workers on the ship and a male slave who attempts to protect a female slave who is presumably going to be raped and is stabbed by the ship worker. Noah Berlatsky even mentions in his article “This seems unlikely on its face—slaves are valuable, and the sailor is not the owner.”# Adding in something unrealistic doesn’t make any sense, how can the movie get history right by getting it wrong if they can’t accurately display how slaves really died on the boat, they were too valuable to their owners to just stab out of anger for attempting to protect a fellow slave. Usually, the slaves died of smallpox or other diseases which couldn’t be cured.# All in all, the film is unable to accurately showcase the true behaviour and actions of the

Open Document