No Justification For The Taking Of Innocent Lives

700 Words2 Pages

No Justification For the Taking of Innocent Lives

According http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/ornellaspaper.htm that death penalty is a government sanctioned practice whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. There are many question of whether the death penalty should be practiced, death penalty can prevent the person in question for committing any more violent acts because of the fear of punishment. While others, oppose it because of ethical issues. There are number of reasons to support and disagree with the argument.
Millions are being killed and will be killed because government justice system is not working. Millions have already been killed and will be killed every year. According to Time Magazine, there are 2,000,000 people beaten in the United States. Some are knifed, shot, or assaulted.
Crime growth has been going up in the past because of too much leniency going hand in hand with the increased rate of people being victimized. There are many loop holes devised for offenders, and because of that crime rate has increased drastically. Between l960 to 1968 crime rate increased 11 times. More and more people are being murdered, raped, assaulted, kidnapped, and robbed, etc. …show more content…

I am in favor of the death penalty, because we can save innocent lives by killing the murderers. Most people have natural fear of death. Death is an experience that cannot be experienced and ends all experience. Because it is unknown as it is certain, death is universally feared. That means, it is a deterrent factor for the potential murderers who will probably murder another person someday. According to roughly a dozen recent studies, executions save lives. For each inmate put to the death, the studies say, 3 to 18 murders are prevented because murderers will probably murder another person

Open Document