Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nickel and dime on not getting by in america by barbara ehrenreich
Nickel and dime on not getting by in america by barbara ehrenreich
Nickel and dime not getting by in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the book Nickel and Dimed: On Not Getting by in America, Barbara Ehrenreich goes undercover to report on the true hardships of being a low wage worker. She starts off her investigation by setting rules for herself. She would keep her car, her reasoning being that no one wants to read a book about someone waiting a bus stop. She would also never go hungry, having an ATM card to prevent that if she could not afford it. Another rule she had made for herself was that she was not allowed to fall back to any skills that she had derived from her usual work. Ehrenreich also states that she does not fit the prototype of a low wage single mother because of her good health, means of transportation, and lack of children. Because she is a native and …show more content…
white English speaker she decides before hand to avoid certain cities such as New York or L.A. where she states the working class is predominantly non white and she fears she would look strange or desperate if she tried to find a job. She started off living in Key West, Florida where she finds a waitressing position at a small restaurant that she calls Jerry's.
She soon finds out that the job is more difficult than she had originally thought it would be. She quickly discovers that she needs to get another job, and she takes a position as a housekeeper. After a day she decides it is too much and quits. the next city she moves to next is Portland, Maine where she acquires two jobs, one as a maid, and the other working in a nursing home. Ehrenreich notes how she thought it odd that she was given so much responsibility at the nursing home even with her lack of previous experience in that area. After Portland she moves to Minnesota and begins a job at a Walmart in Minneapolis. She ends up living in a motel for the entirety of her time there, not being able to find an affordable place to live. She concludes that there is almost no way to be working a minimum wage job with no other sources of income and also be able to afford a deposit for an apartment. Overall she states that she thinks she did exactly average at all of these jobs, and she decides if the workers began to overachieve management would find ways to use that against …show more content…
them. I have very mixed feelings about this book.
I think before Ehrenreich first began the experiment she assumed that with her previous education she would quickly be able to grasp any additional information she learned at a new occupation quite simply. She seemed to have an arrogance to the way she talked about the lower class, which is expected given she had never experienced anything like this before. At first she didn’t seem to understand that she really needed to be watching what she spent her money on. She got a job inconveniently located from where she was residing, making her spend unnecessary money on gas, while she was also buying herself 30 dollar pants stating that it was “necessary”. In the beginning of the book she says that her goal is to “see whether or not I could match income to expenses, as the truly poor attempt to do everyday.” With some quick research I soon found out that she was actually making more than what was considered the poverty level, and without many additional expenses that one in that living condition would usually be paying. It’s skeptical that she was still struggling so greatly while making more than living wage, giving the impression that she may have been inadequately portraying her true experiences to make for a more heartfelt and interesting story. Even though I think there are steps she could have taken to be more accurate, such as not having transportation etc., I still do think the more personal way she described the hardships she
faced did have a strong impact. While the line between reality and drama is still slightly unclear to me, she did work for long hours at a time, causing me believe the true fatigue that she and many others in that situation face. Although I did have several problems with how she underwent this experiment I found myself intrigued as to how Ehrenreich would solve the everyday problems she faced. Her one sided and slightly twisted version of what poverty looks like was unsettling at times, but I do think some of the more general lesson could be of importance such as the concerns she had as being a single women, which I believed to be relevant and sincere fears. I also enjoyed the friendships she had made, and found it refreshing that she at least could show sympathy for the workers without putting herself above them. I think overall this book was not bad, but should more be taken with an open mind in the hopes that the reader would not assume this is the situation for all low wage workers. I started out this book very unsure of what to expect. I had a bad feeling that she would not take it seriously and would instead use her little “cheats” such as her ATM card quite often. Though I was surprised this didn't seem to be the case I still did find more and more concerns as I had addressed previously. I could see throughout the book though that her previous biases seemed to lesson, and I feel the book was less about informing the general public, and more of a personal quest for Ehrenreich herself. Overall I am glad I read it, but I don't think any of the information I learned will be useful for me later as the statistics are outdated and the story line flawed.
She blames capitalism for the injustices of the world, slightly more than easy bad management techniques. A company should be shown that would benefit from a union and it will be shown to all around that one that will promote even better from decent, gentle management decisions. Most irritating, she’s constantly negative about the whole lot, even the positive experiences she has. When one of her colleagues offers to allow her move in with her and her family, not only does Ehrenreich turn the proposal down, but she still describes it sneeringly as a "touched by an angel moment." Does she have to dribble with irony when writing about an authentic type deed?
Like most people whom conduct experiments, Ehrenreich must first establish credibility of her knowledge of this subject. She does this in her introduction in numerous ways. Ehrenreich comes out saying that she has a Ph.D in biology but has a fancy for writing. She starts off with her exposure to low wage paying jobs by using her sister and her husband a companion for over a decade. Her sister, who use to work for the phone company as a sales representative, a factory work and receptionist who described it her experiences as “the hopelessness of being a wage slave”. Her husband use to work for $4.50 an hour in a warehouse before he was fortunate enough to land a good paying job with the union workers the Teamsters.
The biggest appeal that Ehrenreich makes is after she ends up walking out of the housekeeping job/waitress job because she cannot handle it anymore." I have failed I don't cry, but I am in a position to realize, for the first time in many years, that the tear ducts are still there and still capable of doing their job." (Ehrenreich, 48) This is the biggest appeal because Ehrenreich is quitting on the whole project. She is basically telling the readers that it is impossible for her, a "well-off", woman to live the life of a low wage worker.
There are several inconsistencies about the situations that Ehrenreich placed herself in and the real li...
Ehrenreich’s views throughout the book do not help her with getting the reader to agree with her. Her use of humor is more offensive than funny. She put herself in a position where she didn’t go into this project open-minded. She kept her own views, which got in the way of seeing people for who they are. She sarcastically makes fun of her place if work, when she didn’t out herself in the place of the people there. She also mocks people to the extent where it isn’t just a little side comment, but a rude, biased statement. Ehrenreich use of humor in Nickel and Dimed contains too much of an opinionated twist.
According to a 1997 report of the National Coalition for the Homeless, “nearly one-fifth of all homeless people are employed in full or part-time jobs”. In the book Nickel and Dimed, On Not Getting by in America, by Barbara Ehrenreich, the author goes undercover in order to investigate and experience first-hand how life is for America’s “working poor”. The “working poor” are defined as individuals who have a full-time job, sometimes more than one, but still cannot afford the basics of shelter, food and adequate healthcare. As one can imagine, this led to many public health concerns. In each of the three locations visited, Ehrenreich realizes that for many, “getting by” in America can sometimes be a daunting task.
Through this, the reader understands that the author has an advanced amount of knowledge on the subject she will be covering throughout the novel. Feeling as if there will be no need to question her findings or conclusions (due to her vast educational background and the research she put in), the audience is much more susceptible and therefore predisposed to Ehrenreich’s arguments, making it easier for her to make her case.
She knows she will never truly experience poverty because this is nothing more than a project but she leaves behind her old life and becomes known as a divorced homemaker reentering the workforce after many years. Her main goal is to get enough income to be able to pay for all her expenses and have enough money to pay next months rent.
Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Nickel and Dimed, worked at minimum wage paying jobs and reported the hardships that people had to go through on a day-to-day basis. A critic responded by saying, “This is simply the case of an academic who is forced to get a real job.” Ehrenriech’s reasoning for joining the working-class is to report why people who must be on welfare, continue to stay on welfare. Her reports show there are many hardships that go along with minimum wage jobs, in the areas of drug abuse, fatigue, the idea of invisibility, education and the American Dream. A big disadvantage that the lower class has compared to the wealthy is a lack of quality education.
She is fairly new to the work world and has lied on her resume’ to get hired, and realizes that the job is harder than she first thought. All hope is not lost because Violet assures her that she can be trained. She ends up succeeding at the company and telling her husband she will not take him back after he comes back begging for her love again.
In her unforgettable memoir, Barbara Ehrenreich sets out to explore the lives of the working poor under the proposed welfare reforms in her hometown, Key West, Florida. Temporarily discarding her middle class status, she resides in a small cheap cabin located in a swampy background that is forty-five minutes from work, dines at fast food restaurants, and searches all over the city for a job. This heart-wrenching yet infuriating account of hers reveals the struggles that the low-income workers have to face just to survive. In the except from Nickel and Dimed, Ehrenreich uses many rhetorical strategies to illustrate the conditions of the low wage workers including personal anecdotes of humiliation at interviews, lists of restrictions due to limited
Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, published in 2001 by Barbara Ehrenreich, is a book about an author who goes undercover and examines lives of the working lower class by living and working in similar conditions. Ehrenreich sets out to learn how people survive off of minimum wage. For her experiment, she applies rules including that she cannot use skills acquired from her education or work during her job search. She also must take the highest-paying job offered to her and try her best to keep it. For her search of a home, she has to take the cheapest she can find. For the experiment, Ehrenreich took on low-wage jobs in three cities: in Florida, Maine, and Minnesota.
However, she never really experienced the actual life of living in poverty as the majority of people living in poverty experience. Barbara, an educated white women had just that on other people living in poverty, because of the color of her skin and education level that is more often than not restricted from people living in poverty. She was able and more qualified for jobs than other people living amongst the status she was playing. She also was able to more readily seek better benefits than people living in poverty. When she first start her journey in Florida she had a car, a car that in most cases people living in poverty do not have. She was also able to use the internet to find local jobs and available housing in the area that many people living in poverty are restricted from. Another great benefit she had was the luxury of affording a drug detox cleansing her of drugs deemed bad. Many people living in poverty do not have much extra cash laying around much less fifty dollars to afford a detox for prescription drugs. She also had the luxury to afford her prescription drugs, another option that many people living in poverty do not have. Another element that made Barbara’s experience not that genuine was the fact that she was not providing for anybody other than herself. Twenty-two percent of kids under the age of 18 are living below the poverty line (http://npc.umich.edu/poverty/#5) , Barbara did not have to provide for pets or kids which would of changed her experience altogether of living in poverty. Not to belittle Barbara’s experience, but many factors of what life is like living in poverty were not taken into consideration during her
At the beginning, I was very skeptical of Ehrenreich and her set up of the study. She makes it very clear at the beginning of the book that she was not doing this for emotional reasons. She explains that, “My aim here was much more straightforward and objective—just to see whether I could match income to expenses, as the truly poor attempt to do every day (Ehrenreich, 2001, p. 6). This struck me as not only a bit on the heartless side, but a complete and utter flaw in her research methods. As a Ph.D in Bilogy, Ehrenreich is of course used to the objective side of research, but should have known from the start that the real world is not an objective laboratory. The people that she spent all of those months with working and interacting with were not simply robots that only went to work and sleep. They had emotions and dreams and aspirations other than simply to make enough money to pay next month’s rent. When starting the study, Ehrenreich did not take any of this into account. She simply set up a point blank experiment, to attempt to live how the other half lives, but she soon found out that this is not as simply as paying rent for a
Ehrenreich, Barbara. Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books, 2001.