Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on equality vs equity
Nature and causes of equality
Research on myth of equality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the featured article “Equality, a True Soul Food” the author, Nicholas Kristof, discusses problems that social inequality causes. Whilst the discussion he gives evidences from different sources to back up his argument and then comes to the conclusion. The main idea of the text is that huge inequality leads to mental and physical problems. First point that supports this opinion comes from the book “The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger.”, which was written by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett. There is a debate between them about the issue. The outcome of their argument is that human is socially dependent organism. In addition, author shows examples of researches about primates. There is similarity between people
and monkeys in this case. For instance, an experiment which was done on macaques. Ones that had low status had taken more drugs than monkeys with higher social status. Finally, the discussion comes to the problem of United States. There is a data about the same tendency in America as in a whole world. States with higher inequalities suffers more than with lower. Thus, Nicholas Kristof sums up that to decline the problems in USA it should make society more egalitarian.
Arguments about fairness and justice have been up for debate for centuries. "What do we deserve?", a question that has many individuals raising their brows to their efforts in their pursuit to achieve their goals. If it is said that we are all placed on an equal standard why are there individuals struggling to stay afloat? In Arora’s essay, he examines three forms of economic modals of social justices that question that idea of why the prosperous or the impecunious "deserve" their position or stature in life. Out of all of Arora's economic modals that he presents the Meritocratic System is the fairest because it gives everyone a fighting chance.
On the other hand, Carnegie understands that there exists inequality, but he believes that the superior can cooperate with the inferior to gain equality. In fact, it the document he clarifies, “There remains…only one mode of using great fortunes…in this we have the true antidote for the temporary unequal distribution of wealth, the reconciliation of the rich and the poor−a reign of harmony” (Carnegie, 54). Carnegie does not particularly consider inequality a problem. He understands that in order for wealthy to facilitate the lives of the poor, there must be inequality to establish status, but he also discerns that by helping the poor they are given a chance to reach equality. In fact, Carnegie says, “Individualism will
Equality appears to be the ideal factor that can perfect a society. It eliminates the need to feel envious of any human or their qualities. Nevertheless, with impartiality comes lack of diversity and ambition. Inequality is the entity that provides individuals with the passion to strive for a better life. If everyone has already reached their full potential there is no purpose for living.
...nthem, she presents a collectivist society in which a man’s inalienable right of individualism has been revoked, which causes the citizens to render their souls to the strong dictatorship. They conform to part of the programmed group referred to as “We” and compromise their desires to accept the collectivist tenet as true. They possess no free thought and are forbidden to have free will. Gradually, they transform to which they need no palpable shackles because their minds are fettered through the deprivation they suffer. However, she uses the main character Equality to break down the binds of society and form his own individual path. Equality’s story to relates to human existence in which men must lead their own lives or suffer the horrid consequences of interdependence and living for society’s sake.
This article was stimulating to me because it related with me on a personal level. I have been discriminated upon many times in my life and this article excellently explained how white privilege plays a role in determining which groups are in the high or low end of the hierarchy spectrum. In Sklar’s article, Imagine a Country, she explains the growing income inequality between individuals by using several statistics that show the rising wealth gap between the lower, middle, and upper class. Throughout her article, Sklar addresses the controversial topic of high government spending by pointing out that there is an unequal amount of resources that are distributed between large programs such as defense and social programs that help reduce poverty. Her critics have stated that because she is presenting statistical facts as it pertains to income inequality, that she is therefore obligated to include proposals that will address and solve this dilemma. The purpose of this article, contrary to what her critics have criticized her for, is not to present a solution to this
One of out many reasons, I feel as though no matter how poor you are, there should be a way to get the same amount or variety of food as a rich person because we are all humans and should be treated equally. My second opinion based on the article topic is, if everyone were to be treated equally and not based on their social class we’ll be able to live united and it’ll prevent a lot of depression. My third opinion based on the article topic is, in order for us to not discriminate against the poor, we should open numerous food shelter, to feed poor just as much as we feed rich, but have the poor work for it just as well as the rich work for theirs. If this was my topic, I would focus more on how we can improve this situation, to where everyone’s being treated the same. I would focus more on how we should discriminate less, and help out more. I feel as though the author should have covered more on the outcomes, he should have been more descriptive about
Briefly state the main idea of this article: The main idea of this article is that economic inequality has steadily risen in the United States between the richest people and the poorest people. And this inequality affects the people in more ways than buying power; it also affects education, life expectancy, living conditions and possibly happiness. Another idea that he brought up was that the American government tends to give less help to the unemployed than other rich countries.
“Social Equality” by Gunnar Myrdal speaks of the issues of social equality and how an equal so...
In his essay, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau attempts to explain the relationship between the formation of political and social institutions and the state of human nature. Before going into depth regarding the state of human nature, Rousseau starts by first demonstrating the first crucial steps in human evolution and the effects these steps had on the development of inequality. Rousseau believes that the combination of these concepts are important to understanding where we came from, who we are now as a society and what our society will resemble in the future.
In the treatise named “Leviathan” published in 1651, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) proposed an early variant of equality among men that inequality did not exist in natural condition, meaning everyone is born equal; however, inequality's existence was the result of civil laws (Hobbes & Gaskin, 1998). In this sense, inequality is generally referred to social inequality which is characterized by the existence of unequal opportunities and rewards for different social positions or statuses within a group or society; plus, this negative social phenomenon contains structured and recurrent patterns of unequal distributions of goods, wealth, opportunities, rewards, and punishments (Crossman, 2012).
Social inequality has been around for as a long as history can recall. However, according to Joseph Stigliz, it was created by us and did not just appear. As we delve into the history of social inequality, several things stand out to the great economist Joseph stiglitz. In order for Stigliz to portray how inequality is alive today, he uses primarily the rhetorical analysis technique logos and a little ethos to explain how rent seeking causes inequality in many countries including our own.
Each of us is inherently conditioned into a particular way of life by our community and the politics that govern such a society. At any current time, the organization of political principles, such as democracy or distributive justice, has been a predetermined result. We blindly accept that our ancestors were correct and ignore the possibility of objections. Yet, this is a grave mistake, especially considering the fact that our lives and the way society is organized are so intertwined. This means “we cannot avoid thinking of our political practices as alterable, and even (if only in retrospect) as possible objects of choice” (Bird 3). To some, one of the “alterable” political practices of distributive justice, in Socialist Equality of Opportunity (EOP), may seem extreme. The word Socialism has developed into a “meaningless word” that serves as a synonym to tyranny (Orwell 4). Yet, a specific form of socialism, equality of opportunity, has many merits over common, currently practiced systems and should be considered as a legitimate ideal for distributive justice. To realize the aforementioned thesis it is important to first define equality of opportunity. Within the definition, many reasonable objections will surface, but through disputing common theories on distributive justice, it will be relatively simple to recognize the following: EOP is the most rational form of distributive justice given the inherent nature of society, it eliminates a vast number of inherent inequalities, and is the most efficient form of distributive justice if equality of opportunity can be granted.
When someone abuses his power, that means there occurs inequality. However, as the income inequality becomes more and more serious, and the social equality is at risk. One major reason is the rich abuses their power, take away almost everything, leave only so little to the middle class and the poor, that makes the contradiction. Gregory Mantsios wrote "Class in America-2009", he provided some example from the rich, middle class and poor family to discuss the different life condition of the different class in America. Mr. Mantsios state, "Despite what we like to think about ourselves as a nation, the truth is that opportunity for success and life itself are highly circumscribed by our race, our gender, and the class we are born into"(297). A lot of people may think everyone has an equal chance to succeed in this most developed country. However, the article showed many data and example to tell people since the gap between class is very large, then created injustice everywhere. The biggest social problem is people 's future was determined when they were born. If people are born from a rich family, they will have a wonderful life. They even can abuse the money to get more power, they use their money to help Politician 's campaign. What they want to be returned is the low tax and more condition to help their business, then they can be more successful than before, and that causes
According to the research study wealth inequality is morally wrong because has many negatives impacts in society. for some authors wealth inequality, its’s ethical wrong because as stated by them it is a result of hard work and good ideas that make them have more out-puts but for others it is morally wrong because income inequality lead to a serious of problems in society. In the article the effect of poverty and income disparity on the psychological well-being of the Hong Kong children, the authors Ho, Li and Chang argue the poverty and income inequality have negative effects on the psychological well-being of the children. Moreover, In the article On the Wrong Side of Wealth Gap, American’s Diets are Suffering, the author Feldman argues that
Money is an essential part of life where every people can satisfy whatever they need and every person in America has a chance to find a job. However, some of the people in the country wanted to go on with their life freely by being a part of a welfare. Furthermore, distribution of wealth is a huge demand of every citizen. Everyone today is trying to look down for every people in the lower class, as they did not give any benefit to the country, waiting for the benefits that they will receive from the government. For instance, when most lower class people have gone through a financial crisis due to overspending, insufficient fund or pay for their work to support themselves and/or their family. The example shows that lower class people made the economy of the country unstable, however, the middle class and the higher class is at fault as well. Furthermore, even though the benefit of that the lower class received is from the middle class, the middle class as well benefits from the higher class. To sum up, every class is at fault towards giving the country’s economy a positive