Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of government in social welfare policy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of government in social welfare policy
Is it possible to get a new start from the Governments welfare program, Newstart? Is Newstart socially just and adequate and is it sustainable for the taxpayers and the government? To answer these questions, let’s take Brian a 42-year-old unemployed panel beater who has two kids and whether the current Government Welfare scheme can support Brian. Firstly, Newstart is socially just and does adequately support the recipients of the Newstart allowance. 42 Year old Brian’s Budget is very tight in which he only has $23 approx. a week extra on unexpected occurrences. Interest groups showed the overwhelming majority of which expressed the view that the current rate of payment was inadequate and impeded income supports recipient’s ability to meet …show more content…
His speech was backed by influential newspapers such as The Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald (Scalmer, 2014). Not only is Welfare payments making the recipients believe they are entitled to these supporting benefits, but also that there is a link between social misconduct, increased police activity, the emergency department and welfare payments (Australian Welfare Payments lead to social misconduct, 2013). This includes violence and alcohol and drug abuse. Newstart allowance grants $501 per fortnight as the basic benefit, that’s $36 per day, to live (Klapdor, 2013). Despite this figure being low, it provides an incentive to work as unemployment is a devastating social problem, not just an individual problem (Roach & Saunders, 1991). Hence, the Newstart allowance is socially just and adequate and should not be …show more content…
Brian, the 42-year-old, unemployed for 18 months receives $452.80 between him and his part-time employed wife Joan. Brian has been unemployed for 18 months, well past the way the government has intended to be a short-term welfare. The Newstart Allowance cost the government $7.5 Billion per year. Former Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews said that the relentless growth with the public’s intentions on raising the Newstart Allowance will be unsustainable (Harrison, n.d.). Although Australian welfare support payments, the recipients are means tested but around 27% of the population are receiving some form of Government support payments (Butterworth, 2015). This is such a large portion of Australians aren’t paying the tax in which the Government needs to continue paying these supporting payments. In 2015-2016, the Government will spend $154 Billion on welfare. This is around 35% of the total government expenditure (Welfare integrity measures, 2015). 35%, there is no way that this is sustainable as if more than one-third of the taxpayers’ dollars are going to those who don’t work, or don’t work enough to support themselves. Centrelink made 436,745 special payments in 2011-12, almost half of these payments (48%) are those receiving unemployment benefits (Peatling, 2012). The Newstart is intended to be a short-term assistance, but studies show that 65% had been on the support benefit for 12
Hendrick, H. (2005) Child welfare and social policy: an essential reader. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Linda Gordon's article is thoughtful, insightful and highly relevant. As governments slash poverty relief programs at all levels and as welfare-bashing reaches an all-time high, it is instructive to take a step back and look at how the current system developed.
The whole point of this essay is my way of showing the reader using Grunwald’s cites and examples like the personal experiences, Facts and Statistics, and the repetition Grunwald shows that the word welfare has another meaning, the real and true meaning. So the next time you rethink about should you apply for that benefit program or should you inform your friend or cousin about welfare. Do them or yourself a favor and just do it because after reading what I have to say welfare it will always pop up in the back of your head when a person talks about have a bad life or money problems I guarantee
Hays found that initially most welfare workers were optimistic and even excited about the changes. Most workers felt that the Act represented real progress and allowed for positive changes which would positively impact the lives of their clients. Hays spoke to one welfare who said that welfare reform “offered the training and services necessary to 'make our clients' lives better, to make them better mothers, to make them more productive.'” But as she was soon to find out, welfare reform, while it did have a positive impact on the lives of some welfare clients, made the lives of most clients more difficult, not to mention the stress that it caused for the welfare workers who had to deal with the often confusing and illogical new rules.
The current government believes that Britain has become a welfare dependant state and according to BBC news (2013) 2.49 million are currently unemployed; those who are unemployed will also have entitlement to housing benefit and council tax benefit. All claimants will be affected by what will be known as Universal Credits. Universal credits will combine all existing benefits in to one payment; the amount a household can claim in welfare will be capped, this new system could have a catastrophic impact on people’s lives. Furthermore the government does not believe
O?Beirne, Kate. ?The State of Welfare: An old and tricky question resurfaces.? National Review 54.2 (February 11, 2002): 1--2. Online. Information Access Expanded
In the summer of 1996, Congress finally passed and the President signed the "Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996", transforming the nation's welfare system. The passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act sets the stage for ongoing reconstruction of welfare systems on a state-by-state basis. The combined programs will increase from nearly $100 billion this year to $130 billion per year in 6 years. Programs included are for food stamps, SSI, child nutrition, foster care, the bloss grant program for child- care, and the new block grant to take the place of AFDC. All of those programs will seek $700 billion over the next 6 years, from the taxpayers of America. This program in its reformed mode will cost $55 billion less than it was assumed to cost if there were no changes and the entitlements were left alone. The current welfare system has failed the very families it was intended to serve. If the present welfare system was working so well we would not be here today.
Singer’s argument may have swayed many people to donate their dispensable income to children in need despite the fact that it has many fundamental flaws. He argues that we should give away the majority of our earnings to charity. Since Singer wants the reader to donate such a large amount of money, the readers are given no choice but to contribute nothing whatsoever. His solution is not realistic and does not take into account the long-term financial impact this type of donation contribution system would have on a country’s economy.
Blau, J. (2004). The dynamics of social welfare policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
There are many social welfare programs designed to provide income support for Canadians, mostly for those with little to no income. Some may criticize these programs as too generous or an incentive to be lazy, however, welfare rates are below the poverty line, and most of the people receiving benefits cannot find permanent employment or are disabled. In fact, 68% of food bank users receive some form of social assistance. Studies done at the University of Manitoba have shown that guaranteed income programs reduce hospital visits caused by work injuries, domestic violence, and mental health issues, which would save billions of dollars in healthcare and prison costs annually. Extending welfare to the bottom 10% of Canadian would cost approximately $10,000 per person (not taking into account savings in the healthcare system a...
In today’s America, there are many people who would either be disgusted at the very mention of Welfare or be highly grateful for its existence. I believe that in order for welfare to be more effective in America, there must be reform. From the time of its inceptions in 1935, welfare has lent a helping hand to many in crisis (Constitution Rights Foundation). However, at present many programs within the system are being abused and the people who are in real need are being cheated out of assistance. The year after the creation of welfare unemployment was just about twenty percent (Unemployment Statistics). The need for basic resources to survive was unparallel. Today, many people face the same needs as many did during the 30s. Some issues with
Magoon, Kekla. The Welfare Debate. Edina: ABDO Publishing Company, Inc. 2009. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Print.
Loprest, P. J. (2002). Making the transition from welfare to work; successes but continuing concerns
...ican welfare system has many flaws and I have identified major problems and possible solutions/policy recommendations. We can’t completely dismiss government assistance because we are a land of the equality of all and should be proud to have services that help the less fortunate. However, we must identify people who misuse and people who become too comfortable. We can’t continue to fall deeper into debt by supporting people who are not making an effort to support themselves. Nonetheless, we should help and assist those who are constantly trying to become educated, skilled, and experienced enough to become self-sufficient. I will close with a quote from the article about welfare helping a lady survive while she was studying. Currently she has a degree and a job as a manager. “I had clear goals,” “I wasn’t raised to sit at home expecting a check to come in the mail.”
Government welfare was created to help people who were struggling get back on their feet again. People now abuse this privilege that was meant for good. People expect the government to give them food stamps, free health care, and other necessities of life. By doing this, tax dollars of the working class are taking care of people who will not work. To solve this problem, welfare should be temporary not permanent, prove you are looking for a job, have random drug screenings, and work in community service in exchange for welfare. Although government welfare can be a great resource to those in need, there needs to be restrictions and limits put on it so it will not be abused.