Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of Visual literacy
Analysing film techniques - pleasantville
Analysing film techniques - pleasantville
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of Visual literacy
Many cinematic experts, such as the famous director, Martin Scorsese in his essay, “The Persisting Vision: Reading the Language of Cinema,” stressed on the importance of being a visual literate to fully understand and truly experience the story being told on a screen through an intricately designed film. Not only does understanding the cultural, historical, and technical significance of film language help one enhance their visual experience when watching a movie, but also helps in understanding how to create better films, and to genuinely appreciate the work put together by a team of directors, producers, writers, actors, etc., in the universal tongue of cinema. This essay explores the role of cinema as a language and discusses how different …show more content…
This time transition is evident in both the movies, Martin Scorsese’s “New York Stories: Life Lessons” and Jim Jarmusch’s “The Mystery Train.” In “New York Stories: Life Lessons” the viewer experiences Lionel and Paulette’s relationship unwind over time, and the director makes that possible through the proper use of transitioning by making the right cuts. Moreover, in “The Mystery Train,” although the “time period” is the same day, the transition cuts help the audience transition themselves from one story to the next while tying them together as incidents happening …show more content…
From taking multiple, long filmed, wide angle shots, directors began to evolve into complex and intricate visual narratives of the protagonists. This allowed the directors to use close-ups and integrate various camera angles that gave a different perspective to the scene and insinuated a different meaning to the shot other than just the apparent meaning. This made certain shot compositions “ring a bell” and began to speak to each individual viewer differently, in a completely unique way, thus breathing life into each frame and giving it its language. For example, in “New York Stories: Life Lessons” the shots of Paulette are always taken in a way in which Lionel seems to be standing on a lower ground, looking up towards Paulette. For a regular viewer, this might not be of much significance, but for those who analyze the “cinematic” aspect of a film can’t help but notice how such a shot signifies Lionel’s reverence for
Lehman, Peter and Luhr, William. Thinking About Movies: Watching, Questioning, Enjoying. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
...the reflective camera work and the metaphorical visuals. In the film, it is likewise the language of the camera that creates the spectacle.
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
”[1] From the above quote it’s fair to suggest that when answering this. question importance lies in the discussion of Film Language. The assignment will therefore look at the various Film Languages. The text that will be used is Macbeth[2] (Shakespeare), and Roman.
Rascaroli, Laura. "The Essay Film: Problems, Definitions, Textual Commitments." Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 49.2 (2008): 24-47. JSTOR. Web. 08 May 2014.
In his essay, “It’s Just a Movie: A Teaching Essay for Introductory Media Classes”, Greg M. Smith argues that analyzing a film does not ruin, but enhances a movie-viewing experience; he supports his argument with supporting evidence. He addresses the careful planning required for movies. Messages are not meant to be telegrams. Audiences read into movies to understand basic plotlines. Viewers should examine works rather than society’s explanations. Each piece contributes to Smith’s argument, movies are worth scrutinizing.
Gallagher, T. 2002. Senses of Cinema – Max Ophuls: A New Art – But Who Notices?. [online] Available at: http://sensesofcinema.com/2002/feature-articles/ophuls/ [Accessed: 8 Apr 2014].
Since the creation of films, their main goal was to appeal to mass audiences. However, once, the viewer looks past the appearance of films, the viewer realizes that the all-important purpose of films is to serve as a bridge connecting countries, cultures, and languages. This is because if you compare any two films that are from a foreign country or spoken in another language, there is the possibility of a connection between the two because of the fact that they have a universally understanding or interpretation. This is true for the French New Wave films; Contempt and Breathless directed by Jean-Luc Godard, and contemporary Indian films; Earth and Water directed by Deepa Mehta. All four films portray an individual’s role in society using sound and editing.
Bazin, Andre. “Evolution of the Language of Cinema.” What is Cinema Volume 1, edited and translated by Hugh Gray, 23-40. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1967.
middle of paper ... ... In final analysis, the motion picture is the one that goes deeper inside the spectator’s mind. Other mediums such as still picture and theatrical play also provide the visual and aural elements for the spectator, yet they seem to be inferior to the motion picture in that they lack the reality, affinity, and creativity in terms of use of time and space. The levels of emotions such as attention, memory, imagination, emotion, and unity, which were introduced by Munsterberg, indicates how the spectator perceives the elements of the film and ends up with it.
Lacey, N. (2005). Film Language. Introduction to film (pp. 16-22). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barsam, R. M., Monahan, D., & Gocsik, K. M. (2012). Looking at movies: an introduction to film (4th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Co..
Boggs, J. M., Petrie, D. W. (2004). The Art of Watching Films (6 ͭ ͪ ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
“Entertainment has to come hand in hand with a little bit of medicine, some people go to the movies to be reminded that everything’s okay. I don’t make those kinds of movies. That, to me, is a lie. Everything’s not okay.” - David Fincher. David Fincher is the director that I am choosing to homage for a number of reasons. I personally find his movies to be some of the deepest, most well made, and beautiful films in recent memory. However it is Fincher’s take on story telling and filmmaking in general that causes me to admire his films so much. This quote exemplifies that, and is something that I whole-heartedly agree with. I am and have always been extremely opinionated and open about my views on the world and I believe that artists have a responsibility to do what they can with their art to help improve the culture that they are helping to create. In this paper I will try to outline exactly how Fincher creates the masterpieces that he does and what I can take from that and apply to my films.
Movies take us inside the skin of people quite different from ourselves and to places different from our routine surroundings. As humans, we always seek enlargement of our being and wanted to be more than ourselves. Each one of us, by nature, sees the world with a perspective and selectivity different from others. But, we want to see the world through other’s eyes; imagine with other’s imaginations; feel with other’s hearts, at a same time as with our own. Movies offer us a window onto the wider world, broadening our perspective and opening our eyes to new wonders.