Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Opposing voice of the white man's burden
Impact of new imperialism in africa
Impact of imperialism on african economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Opposing voice of the white man's burden
The Hidden Cost of Scientific Progress It is a known fact that the second half of the 19th century was a period of the “New Imperialism”. This “New Imperialism” was not a new direction of the European or perhaps world’s economic politic, but the “same old colonialism” of lands, such as Africa, India and Asia, which was driven further due to the different requirements and goals this time. Economic and scientific progress brought new aspects of concentration for the European society. During the previous invasions of European powers on the territories of Africa the trade of slaves was the main reason, when now their interests were concentrated on the obtainment of natural resources and raw materials, such as metals, diamonds, rubber, cotton, palm …show more content…
Contributing to the development of science, Charles Darwin argued in his work that “man is descended from some less highly organized form”, proceeding his explanation with following: “there can hardly be a doubt that we [modern society of his time] are descended from barbarians. The astonishment which I felt on first seeing a party of Fuegians on a wild and broken shore will never be forgotten by me, for the reflection at once rushed into my mind – such were our ancestors. (…) They possessed hardly any arts, and like wild animals lived on what they could catch; they had no government, and were merciless to everyone not of their own tribe” (Lualdi, p.182-184). At that particular period of time, when European society was already influenced by the ideas of positivism – the theory which stated that science and “careful study of facts would generate accurate, or “positive”, laws of society and that these laws could, in turn, help in the formation of policies and legislation”, Darwin’s argument only “fueled” the Western European’s notion of the superiority of their race and culture, affecting their worldview and contributing to the belief that people of other “colors” then their own can be viewed as less civilized and literally “less human”, being far behind European’s level of progress and intelligence (Hunt, …show more content…
Richard Kipling in his “The White Man’s Burden” justifies the idea of expending the superior European civilization and progress along with emphasizing that it is almost an obligation for the people of white race to contribute to the development of people of other “colors” (Lualdi, p. 220). In his poem Kipling points out on the “cost” and consequences of the “fulfillment” of this “duty”, suggesting or “warning [to] all intelligent Americans to avoid imperialism as they would avoid a plague” because of the horrible consequences it may and will bring about (Lualdi, p.
This Social Darwinism also led to the concept of “White Man’s Burden,” which held the “superior” races responsible for civilizing the “inferior” ones. Martial Henri Merlin also states that “We are entitled to go out to these peoples and occupy their territories; but when we exercise this right, we, at the same moment, are charged with a duty towards these peoples, and this duty we must never for one instant forget.” This view might have occurred due to an exposure to the “White Man’s Burden” concept which had spread throughout Europe. There was also exploitation, which is illustrated by a letter from George Washington Williams, a Baptist minister, lawyer, historian and legislature, sent to King Leopold II of Belgium. According to his account, “There were instances in which Mr. Henry M. Stanley sent one white man.to make treaties with the native chiefs.
Myers, provider of source material for Edie Heydt's notes from "Human Origins," fall 1997, Alfred. Much of the material in the notes is paraphrased, and the original information sources are unknown. Michael Ruse, The Darwinian Revolution, pub. 1979 by The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637. H. G. Wells, The Island of Dr. Moreau, copyright 1996 by Dover Publications, Inc.,
The United States saw its territory more than double in the first three decades of the 19th century. Bursting with nationalist fervor, an insatiable desire for more land, and a rapidly increasing population, the western frontiers of the United States would not remain east of the Mississippi. The eventual spread of the American nation beyond the Mississippi into Native and French land, referred to as “Manifest Destiny” by John O’Sullivan, was rationalized as a realization of their God given duty. The Louisiana Purchase set the precedent for unrestricted westward expansion in America, and allowed for others to follow in his footsteps. Characterized by racist overtones, a lack of the “consent of the governed, and ethnic cleansing, there is no valid distinction between this American continental expansion and the international expansion sought by Europe in the late 19th and 20th centuries, and is clearly imperialist in nature.
The “Roaring Twenties” was a time period known for its innovation. Skirts got shorter, teens got bolder, and Prohibition was in full swing. These changes also gave way to a time period full of religious conflict. “In [religious] minds, Prohibition had always been about more than alcohol. It represented an effort to defend traditional American values against the growing influence of an urban, cosmopolitan culture” (Gillon 152). Charles Darwin had published his book, The Evolution of Species, in 1859 and The Descent of Man in 1871, detailing the evolution of man from ape-like creatures. When A Civic Biology, a biology textbook containing information on evolution, was published in 1914, teachers around the country began using it in their courses. By the twenties, these books had sparked all sorts of new ideas regarding the origin of man as well as opposition due to the creature from which he claimed we evolved and to the disagr...
The theory of social darwinism was first introduced to the public[1] in “A Theory of Population, Deduced from the General Law of Animal Fertility”, an article by Herbert Spencer published in 1852. This work preceded the publishing of Darwin’s book by seven years, and “given the timing, it is curious that Darwin’s theory was not labeled ‘natural Spencerism’ instead of Spencer’s theory being labeled ‘social Darwinism.’”[2] Spencer’s article, though mainly focused on biology and the ways in which animal populations develop, does include an inkling of the social ideas he would later more fully examine. His main theory of population deals with survival of the fittest, a phrase he coins in this a...
Though colonial imperialism was in stark decline following the turn of the 19th century, its theme perpetuates even today through mass privatization and rigid global capitalism. The need for personal, racial, and national superiority arises from a need to stay competitive culturally and economically. The question is: why does this need perpetuate? I believe the answer to be quite simple. Personal interests and a desire to maintain ones own standard of living places the needs and cultural interests of others second in the global race for more capital.
Social Darwinism was a set of theories developed by various people during the 19th century. It was the adaptation of Darwin's theory of evolution applied to human social behavior and ability to survive compared to other human beings. It can now easily be seen that these theories could be used to justify racial discrimination and they have been used in this way throughout history. This misconception of Darwin’s theories popularized by various academics in the west caused western nations to treat other nations badly. People like French man Joseph Gobineau had already come up with race supremacy ideas before Darwin’s theories of evolution started to become a popular idea.
Although there are many other important factors, the main cause of the rise of imperialism was most certainly economic. The Age of Empire, by Eric J. Hobsbawn, provides an interpretation of New Imperialism. Hobsbawn calls imperialism “a natural by-product of the international economy” (Sherman pg 177). He is basically saying that imperialism is dependent on the rivalries of competing industries, which continually drive the international economy. Hobsbawn also dictates the need for external markets. The Industrial Revolution created many products that needed markets, thus creating a need of colonies. Hobsbawn believed that the overproduction of the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression could be solved. He also realized that many businessmen knew that they could make a large profit off of China’s large population. For example, if every one of the three hundred million Chinese purchased one box of tin-tacks the businessmen knew that there would be a huge profit, consequently increasing the desire for colonization of weaker countries.
In the early 1880’s, the powers of Europe started to take control of regions in Africa and set up colonies there. In the beginning, colonization caused the Africans little harm, but before long, the Europeans started to take complete control of wherever they went. The Europeans used their advanced knowledge and technology to easily maneuver through the vast African landscape and used advanced weapons to take control of the African people and their land. The countries that claimed the most land and had the most significant effect on Africa were France, England, Belgium, and Germany. There were many reasons for the European countries to be competing against each other to gain colonies in Africa. One of the main reasons was that the Europeans believed that the more territory a country was able to control, the more powerful it could become and the more powerful it would be seen as by other countries. Other reasons for the desire to control African land included the many natural resources that could only be found in Africa, such as diamonds, gold, and as time progressed, rubber. It also provided new markets in surrounding places so that manufactured goods could be sold for a larger profit. The Europeans had many motives for imperialism in Africa. Yet the true motives were often shielded as they tried tom present themselves as humanitarians when in reality they were making Africa a terrible place to live with brutality and harsh treatment of the African natives. The ways of the Europeans had many physical and emotional costs for the people of Africa. The imperialism process also took a toll on the people of Europe. The European imperialistic colonization in Africa was motivated by the desire to control the abundant natural resources an...
Klin, Candyce. “Darwinism as A Cultural Issue” Cedar Crest College, 2 June 2001. Web. 17
There were two different time periods where Imperialism occurred. The first wave of imperialism, called the 'Old' Imperialism, lasted from around 1500 - 1800. The 'New' Imperialism lasted from around 1870 - 1914. The three main differences that we will discuss today are the differences in economics, politics, and the motive behind all of this.
New imperialism was the mid nineteenth and twentieth centuries cultural equivalent to a modern day mafia, its roots entangled in the economic, cultural, and humanistic aspects of life. The sole objective of the nations entailed the exploitation of their controlled state. Gestating from the change in control of Asian and African nations to the Europeans by means of political deviance, malicious sieges, and strategic military attacks. The juxtaposition to the modern equivalent endures as the aforesaid is sheltered by the fairytale that these nations were in need of aid and by doing so the Europeans were the good guys. The ideas of new imperialism are greatly influenced by those of the enlightenment. Taking place during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the enlightenment was an intellectual movement with the goal of social progress (Genova, 1/11). Armed with scientific thought and reason, enlightenment thinkers set out to explore the fields of science, economics, and human nature. Brilliant minds such as Voltaire, Kant and others all across Western Europe collaborated to further knowledge. The enlightenment laid the foundation on which new imperialism sprung, embedding the ideas of an incessant need to explore not only the scientific world but the physical world as well. The enlightenments goals and ideas significantly influenced new imperialism, because the enlightenment created a need for new means and a purpose to accrue them.
At the time that Rudyard published “The White Man’s Burden”, whites were already conflicted on what to do about the non-whites (US, 437). Some whites claimed that there should be little to no intervention of the whites on the non-white societies because Charles Darwin’s theory of “survival of the fittest” is the way that things should be (US, 437). The whites who were for intervention argued that it was the humane and religious duty of whites to become involved (US, 437). They also exclaimed that it was better to help the non-white develop because of the need for trade (US, 437). Because there had already been such a debate between the whites over this issue, Rudyard’s poem gained attention quick (lecture notes, 2/8). Rudyard’s work gained attention of American leaders and became an inspiration for future actions of imperialism (lecture notes, 2/8).
The Europeans saw Africa as being a great place to obtain all types of resources from labor to natural materials. Items such as cotton, coal, rubber, copper, tin, gold, and other metals were considered very valuable and readily available in Africa (Nardo). The industrial revolution had already become a strong influence on the countries that attended the Conference. They had spent the past...
The Europeans needed resources, but even with the economic need, a social justification would be necessary to push colonialism into the force that it became. A Eurocentric attitude soon emerged, solidifying the European cause. “On the Origin of Species” was published by English scientist Charles Darwin in the late 19th century, and not long after would his scientific words be contorted into a racist philosophy. Charles Darwin’s personal beliefs on social injustice are debated, but his book was on evolution and did not contain a hidden social commentary or agenda. People interpreted his writing on natural selection and applied it to human nature, believing that since “it was natural, normal, and proper for the strong to thrive at the expense of the weak,” colonizing the weak Africa was justified by science.