Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short essay on social darwinism
New imperialism
Old and new imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
New imperialism is a term used to describe the sudden mania for expansion and conquest that gripped Western powers in the late 19th century. It was a time period of colonial expansion of European powers, specifically Africa, known as the Scramble for Africa, it was the occupation, division, and colonization of African territory by European powers during the period of New Imperialism, between 1881 and 1914. One of the most brutal and famous colonization was when King Leopold from Belgium colonized Congo. King Leopold was the second King of the Belgians from 1865 to 1909 and became known for the founding and brutal exploitation of the Congo Free State as a private venture, he was one of the most cruel and imperious 19th century European heads …show more content…
of state, ruled the Congo as his personal fiefdom, though he never set foot there, he used many brutal tactics in order to achieve his goal in colonizing Congo. Many other European leaders used the same tactics to successfully colonize Africa. Historians may argue that Belgium imperialized Congo in the 19th century in order to get natural resources that were not available in Europe and to civilize the underdeveloped Africans which led to mass slaughter and limited social rights of the Africans.
Some historians may argue that Belgium imperialized Congo in the 19th century in order to get natural resources that were not available in Europe because they discovered that instead of trading, they could save resources by occupying the place. There was a great demand for natural resources and products not found in Western Countries, such as rubber, oil, and tin. Because of the massive industrialization increase, the demand for these resources increases as well. European investors advocated direct control of the areas where the raw materials were found. This was because …show more content…
important discoveries made by the European explorers. European explorers had made two important discoveries about the area’s inhabitants. One was that they were no military threat: his nearly three dozen battles showed their spears and arrows and decrepit muskets to be no match for his new, breech-loading snider rifles.” (King Leopold’s Ghost, 62) This shows that one of the reason why Belgium colonized Congo was because they had discovered the underdeveloped military of the Africans, they decided to take over the resources in order to profit even more. When King Leopold II wrote a letter to his Minister Beernaert on the Congo, he states “ The immense river system of the Upper Congo opens the way for our efforts for rapid and economical ways of communication that will allow us to penetrate directly into the center of the African continent.” (Letter from King Leopold II of Belgium to Minister Beernaert on the Congo) This shows that the geography of Congo created a easy way for King Leopold II colonize Congo, created a temptation of colonizing Congo. The river combined with the weak military force, made the conquest effortless, the immense amount of resources in Congo benefited the Belgium economy, creating what we call the economic motive. Some historians may also argue that Belgium imperialized Congo in the 19th century in order to civilize the underdeveloped Africans because they discovered how weak and impoverished their military and society was.
In the White Man’s burden, it states “ Take up the White Man’s burden- Send forth the best ye breed- Go send your sons to exile To serve your captives’ need” (Kipling, White Man’s burden) This shows that the Europeans really wanted the Africans to do everything for them while they do the commanding. The line “Send forth the best ye breed” shows that not only they wanted to take away all the freedom and opportunities they had, they wanted only the best men, in order to make the best economic profit. The Europeans also justified their colonial expansion by using Social Darwinism. “How many centuries, how many thousands of years, have the Kaffir or the negro held large districts in Africa undisturbed by the white man? Yet their intertribal struggles have not yet produced a civilization in the least comparable with the Aryan. Educate and nurture them as you will.” This shows that the Europeans believed that for centuries, the Africans had not been disturbed by other race, however, they still couldn't develop a civilization that is comparable to the Europeans, therefore, it is completely reasonable for the Europeans to try to civilize the underdeveloped Africans. Social Darwinism was one of a big reason why Belgium colonized
Congo. The economic benefits of Belgium led to to mass slaughter and limited social rights of the Africans. The Europeans restricted the rights of the Africans because they wanted the Africans to do what they say in order to get the most profit. King Leopold’s brutal tactics to get people to follow his order was effective but heartless, “ A detachment of soldiers would march into an Africans village and seize the women as hostages. Dos secure their wives’ release, the men would have to disperse into the rain forest to collect the sap of wild rubber vines.” ( Spielvogel, 152) The men were forced to do what the Europeans want because they held their wife hostage. This shows that the Congo colonization were completely forced and did not have any contract that benefited the Africans, rendering them as slaves. This caused the Africans to revolt, unite in order to go against the Europeans. In the Black Man’s Burden, it states “ Hail ye your fearless armies, which menace feeble folks Who fight with clubs and arrows ad brook your rifle’s smoke.” (H.T. Johnson, The Black Man’s Burden) This describes how the Africans were not satisfied with their attempt of trying to civilize them. This shows that the Africans wants to fight back, unite together in order to beat the fearless armies with clubs and arrows. It also states “In vain ya see to end it, with bullets, blood or death better by far defend it with honor’s holy breath.” (H.T. Johnson, The Black Man’s Burden)This shows how the Africans are willing to defend their territory with their body even though they will die, they think it is a honor to be able to defend their own land, conveys the result of Imperialism were just blood and death, people fighting for Independence. Historians may argue that Belgium imperialized Congo in the 19th century in order to get natural resources that were not available in Europe and to civilize the underdeveloped Africans which led to mass slaughter and limited social rights of the Africans. This shows that whatever that caused the Imperialism, had bad results and it did not work because invading someone’s homeland trying to say that they are better at civilizing is not true.
The book mainly chronicles the efforts of King Leopold II of Belgium which is to make the Congo into a colonial empire. During the period that the European powers were carving up Africa, King Leopold II of Belgium seized for himself the vast and mostly unexplored territory surrounding the Congo River.
Throughout the 19th century, European Imperialism had a major effect on Africa. As countries expanded in terms of wealth, resources, and innovation, more territory and workers were needed. The first solution to solve these problems was to begin colonizing in Africa. The driving force for imperialism in Europe and Africa was mainly economical. This economical approach was established through many ways including cultural and nationalistic ideas.
One of the main reasons Europeans colonized Africa was for their useful resources. There are countless assets in the African landscape that were wanted by other nations. The European countries had access to some of the worlds most needed resources such as cotton, oils, coal, gold, and diamonds because they controlled Africa. This is shown on a chart of African colonies and their exports. ("Selected African Colonies and Their Exports" 269). This shows how the European countries carefully selected the land they did, to get certain resources they needed or wanted to use to benefit from. Another chart from a book by Trevor Lloyd, (Lloyd, The British Empire), displays the large jump of exports to Africa from 1854 to 1900. What that means is once Great Britain established complete control of South Saharan Africa, they began to export the resources they found that they could use. These charts are proof of how the European's wanted resources, and that is one of the main reasons for the imperialization of Africa. Not only did the European nations want the continent's resources, but they had an equal hunger for power.
The land Leopold had obtained was about eighty times larger than that of Belgium itself. Plus, Leopold was proclaimed the “sovereign” ruler of the entire Congo Free State, granting him the power to exercise total control, where as, in Belgium, Leopold was forced to rule under a constitutional monarchy.... ... middle of paper ... ... “Africa Imperialism” History of Imperialism.
In conclusion, the motives concerning imperialism in Africa are a matter of expanding empires, helping natives, and natural resources. Europeans countries constantly tried to compete with their neighbors in fair ways to become the most dominating country. Just as much as they took possession of Africa, their will was also to assist Africa on their right path and put an end to any dilemmas they may be
The results of European colonialism shows that the aim of colonialism is to exploit the human and economic resources of an area to benefit the colonizing nation. As a result, the nation that is colonized is affected negatively. In reality, how Europe really affected Africa as a whole is much
When the Europeans arrived in Africa, many would of thought that imperialism wasn?t fied because the Europeans were enslaving the Africans. As stated in David Diop's An Anthology of West African Verse, "And in the Conqueror's voice said, 'Boy! A chair, a napkin, a drink.'" Stated blatantly, the "conqueror" is a European, and he is commanding an African to serve him. Forcing Africans into slavery certainly doesn?t justify European imperialism in Africa, however, there are many reasons as to why imperialism actually was justified.
Expansion was a goal that all nations wanted to achieve. Prince Leopold, the heir of the Belgian Throne, in a conversation, explained that “since history teaches us that colonies are useful. let us strive to get on in our turn. to lead to progress in every sense.” Being a prince, Leopold must have had a pro imperialist point of view, because he wanted to keep Belgium strong and prosperous.
Imperialism in Africa took root in the late 19th century when European nations divided up the continent for their own benefit. Each nation practiced a certain type of rule over the Africans of which they conquered. For example, the Germans, the Dutch, and the French used the practice of Direct Rule over their colonies in Africa. This system is characterized by the colonizers need for the colonized to become assimilated into their culture. The purpose of this was to make the African people “civilized” and act like Europeans. The governing administrations forced on the native inhabitants by the colonial power were meant to undermine those institutions set in place by the indigenous people. By taking over the community’s government on all levels,
While Leopold II, the King of Belgium, desperately wanted an overseas colony, The Belgian people did not share his enthusiasm; which created the feelings of neglect and apathy Belgium had towards Congo. The Congo Free State, established “in the margins of the Berlin Conference” in 1885, allowed Leopold to “gain international recognition of his possession” which he had begun to take control of since the 1870s. However, while Leopold was securing control of the Congo, the Belgian people were not interested in controlling colonies, as they believed that colonies “would merely soak up resources that would be better used for social purposes at home.” Thus, the Belgian people decided to solve the problem of having an unwanted colony by separating the Belgian government from...
Imperialism is the domination by one country of political, economic, or cultural life of another country or region and occurred during the 1800’s in Africa. Imperialism in Africa was caused by four factors in Europe: economy, politics/military, humanitarian/religion, and Social Darwinism (Ellis). The Industrial Revolution in Europe caused the need for oversea expansion because the manufacturers needed things like: rubber, petroleum, and palm oil all of which Africa had. Europe moving into Africa was also caused by nationalism, when France went into Africa so did Britain (Ellis). The difference between France and Britain was the way of rule they used. There are four different methods of imperialism: direct, indirect, protectorate, and sphere of influence. The most popular were direct and indirect. The French used direct, they sent officials and soldiers from France to administer their colonies and their purpose was to inflict French culture on their colonies and make them into French provinces (Ellis). The British, however, used indirect, they used chiefs to oversee their colonies and encouraged the children in the colonies to get education in Britain. The British “Westernized” their colonies and only used military force when threatened (Ellis).
The colonization of Africa officially began in 1884 with the Berlin Conference. Western European powers began to split up the land and resources in Africa among themselves. This period of history became known as the Scramble for Africa. The Scramble for Africa occurred because as the slave trade ended, capitalists saw Africa as a continent that they could now exploit through legitimate trade. European capitalists found new ways to make money off of the continent. With greater exploration of the continent even more valuable resources were found. The encouragement of legitimate trade in Africa brought Europeans flocking to colonize Africa. Africa lost their independence, and along with it, their control over their natural resources. Europeans used the term the "White Man's Burden," a concept used by white colonizers in order to impose their way of life on Africans within their colonies, to ...
The New Imperialism and the Scramble for Africa 1880-1914. Jeff Taylor, n.d. Web. 19 Mar. 2014.
During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for its own growth and power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa without a second thought. European imperialism in Africa had a negative impact because of social disarray, cultural loss, and death it caused. As the Europeans started to invade Africa and split up the land, they paid no attention to the already existing natural boundaries. Over time, villages with different cultures had set these boundaries.
In order to properly understand the effects of colonization, one must look at its history. Most of Africa was relatively isolated from Europe throughout early world history, but this changed during the 17th to the 20th centuries. Colonization efforts reached their peak between the 1870s and 1900 in the “Scramble for Africa” which left the continent resembling a jigsaw puzzle Various European powers managed to colonize Africa including Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Portugal, and Spain. This intense imperialist aggression had three major causes. The primary reason was simply for economic gain. Africa is refuge to vast, unexplored natural resources. European powers saw their opportunity and took it. Another motive was to spread the Christian religion to the non-Christian natives. The last major incentive was to demonstrate power between competing European nations. African societies did try to resist the colonial takeover either through guerilla warfare or direct military engagement. Their efforts were in vain, however, as by the turn of the century, only Liberia and Ethiopia remained not colonized. European powers colonized Africa according to the guidelines established by the Berlin Act (1885). Many of the colonized nations were ruled indirectly through appointed governor...