Neoplatonism in Shakespeare and its Effect on Modern Literature

2064 Words5 Pages

Neoplatonism in Shakespeare and its Effect on Modern Literature Few writers have managed to enter the world-wide public consciousness as well as Shakespeare; everyone knows his name and can terribly misquote his plays. Yet, for all his popularity, many of his critics have called him unlearned, saying his plays are entertaining but shallow. These same critics often point at the many inconsistencies of his writing, claiming that Shakespeare was not trying to convey anything but witticisms and beautiful sounds. Of course, even his harshest detractors acknowledge his plays and sonnets have influenced the world's literature on a scale that is intimidating; every writer of his era stood in his shadow, and modern literature stands on his shoulders. Shakespeare was a product of his time as much as any man must be, and his writing is rife with the ideals of Neoplatonism, which was only just surfacing in the European realm of thought as Shakespeare began writing. Platonism and its effect on Shakespeare, and in turn his effect on modern literature, has had lasting repercussions. Neoplatonism: A School of Thought Many philosophers other than Plato himself make up the umbrella of Neoplatonism. These philosophers, both contemporaries of Plato and his successors, offered varied viewpoints and fleshed out Plato's ideas. Neoplatonism is the result of an amalgamation of both philosophic and religious/mystic beliefs. Kaballah, Islam, and the more esoteric elements of Christianity were incorporated into the framework of Plato's teachings. Arcane practices such as alchemy and theurgy, now known to be foolish pseudo-sciences, arose out of Neoplatonic beliefs. One of the key tenants of Plato's teachings is The Forms. Plato attempts to explain t... ... middle of paper ... ...Neoplatonism that could very well have damaged society. Cultural relativism is a fact of the reality humanity inhabits, so carrying the idea that only one Ideal exists can easily allow a person to slip into prejudice or bigotry. Also, the conceptualization of perfection, or the idea Anselm employed in his Ontological Argument, as something that which nothing greater than can be conceived, has changed the way in which the world works. This concept of perfection is self-defeating since the imagination is limitless and variable. Every person is constantly picturing the Form of Good and everyone is manufacturing that Ideal differently. Whether Neoplatonism is detrimental or advantageous to society is a point nearly impossible to argue since our society is so derivative of it; Neoplatonism has had a definite impact on the art of the world, and therefore the world itself.

Open Document