Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection about critical thinking
Reflection about critical thinking
Methods of critical thinking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Neil Postman, in his essay “Defending Against the Indefensible,” suggests that it is important to encourage students to notice certain types of language that can be subjective or misleading. Postman establishes seven notions that should be taught to students for the purpose of allowing them to be conscious of potentially harmful material: definitions, questions, simple words, metaphors, reification, style and media.
First, Postman states that definitions are often “arbitrary” and students should consider that definitions often do not consist of straight facts as they are created by a person-and therefore are influenced by the creator’s personal biases-for a specific purpose (22).
Postman then introduces his second concept: questions. We must understand that the wording and language used to pose a question influences the answer we will receive. It is suggested that students need to learn to
…show more content…
recognize that the answers that we receive in many disciplines correspond directly to the way in which the questions were asked. It is potentially dangerous to ignore the relationship between question and answer, and vice-versa. Next, Postman claims that students need to be aware of the meanings of words for which the definitions are often considered to be intuitive. These simple words such as “true” or “fact” are often subjective and therefore their definitions cannot be understood without considering the conditions in which they are applied. Fourth, Postman places emphasis on the importance of understanding metaphors as a means to fully understand information in various domains.
The education of students is lacking in substantial curriculum designed to help students decipher the metaphors that we encounter so often.
Reification is introduced by Postman to be the fifth concept designed for students to consider when learning to avoid misleading information. It is important to acknowledge that “there are things in the world and then there are our names for them; that there is no such thing as a real name; and that a name may or may not suggest the nature of the thing named…” (Postman, 26). We must be aware that misleading names can be attributed to items or actions in order to distort our perception of the item or action itself.
Sixth, style and tone are responsible for a large portion of the discernment between genres and subjects. Postman states that every discipline has its own range of style and tone that sets it apart from other genres. Textbooks can often mask these subtleties with a uniformly bland
tone. Lastly, Postman discusses how the medium in which language or information is conveyed alters and systemizes the language itself. It is necessary to understand
1 Wilson Follett, in the article “On Usage, Purism, Pedantry” from Modern American Usage, promotes how two parties view the rights and wrongs concerning the usage of language.
His first principle is definition. Students must consider that definitions are not concrete. They are created by people, which make definitions subjective rather than objective. One person’s definition of something may be different from another person’s, and they both could be correct. The definition is largely dependant on the viewer’s
In English 1102, I was exposed to a variety of different genres, including, argumentative research paper, an annotated bibliography, an analytical paper, and a workplace specific piece. Entering this class the majority of papers I had written were all analytical, and in this class we went above and beyond the basic 5 paragraph essay. Though each paper had a different genre and style, I learned that each project was similar in composition.
To begin, the authors’ style plays a major role in conveying their purpose. One of the first things anyone will notice is the title chapters, which are named by seemingly abstract and unrelated topics. For example, the first chapter is named, “What Do Schoolteachers and Sumo Wrestlers Have in Common?” This question makes the
Birk and Birk explore the many processes that automatically and often unintentionally, take place during the gathering of knowledge and expression through words. In their book Birk and Birk break the usage of words into sections: Selection, Slanting by the use of emphasis, slanting by selection of facts, and slanting by the use of charged words. When words are used this way they reveal naturally occurring bias of the writer. Upon reviewing the selection from Birk and Birk’s book Understanding and Using Language it is clear that the essay written by Jake Jameson has examples of every principal Birk and Birk discuss. The Birk and Birk selection provides us with a set of tools that enable us to detect bias in the many forms that it takes. These tools reveal what Jamieson favors and make plain the bias present in his essay The English-Only movement: Can America Proscribe Language With a Clean Conscience?
Jones, Gerard. “Violent Media is Good for Kids.” Analytical Writing: A Guide to College Composition 1. M. Clay Hooper.,D. Marzette., Beth Wade. Cengage Learning, 2011. 285-88. Print.
“The Coddling of the American Mind” is a persuasive article written by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt about the increased use of trigger warnings. As all persuasive writing does, the authors used logos, ethos, and, especially, pathos to convince their readers of how unnecessary and possibly harmful the use of trigger warnings can be. In “Coddling of the American Mind”, authors Lukianoff and Haidt try to sway their readers with facts and logic, or the rhetorical appeal known as logos. The most obvious use of logos is the list of Common Cognitive Distortions listed at the end of the article; this list provides helpful information for the reader, as well as makes the authors seem knowledgeable. Definitions for words such as “microaggression”
Neil Postman (March 8, 1931- Octomber 5, 2003) was an American author, educator, ,media theorist and cultural critic, who is best known for his seventeen books, including “Amusing Ourselves to Death”(1985). Postman’s best known book is “Amusing Ourselves to Death”. Since TV replace the written word , Postman belive that people would be more and more attracted to this, but he also argue that television is not an effective way of providing education after all.
In his argument, Postman described how technology is affecting our way of thinking. The main suspect in this case is television. In his book, Postman pointed out one of the significant facts in the twentieth century, which was: “the decline of the Age of Typography and the ascendancy of the Age of Television”(8). As soon as the shift began, the social institutions involved in printed content were forced to learn the language of the television. Since television’s content is entertainment-oriented, serious forms of public discussions were also modified to be more entertaining. Postman believes that, “whatever the original and limited of its use may have been, a medium has the power to fly far beyond that context into new and unexpected ones”(18). When exposed to writing, humans’ minds are still able to respond with a critical reaction. But that is not the case with television and modern-day media. This is because of what Postman described as “media-metaphor”. He suggested that the media works like a metaphor, giving us powerful implications to enforce their definition of reality. Many television programs and advertisement are inexplicitly telling us
This burden often falls on teachers. The purpose of this research paper is to discuss censorship in schools and to argue that the censorship of books in the high school English curriculum is limiting and takes away literature that is meaningful to students. How a Book is Censored Brinkley describes a few actions that can lead to the censoring of a book in a school or school system: An expression of concern is simply a question about the material with overtones of disapproval; an oral complaint is an oral challenge to the contents of a work; a written complaint is a formal written challenge to the school about the contents of a work; and a public attack is a public statement challenging the contents of a work that is made outside of the school, usually to the media to gain support for further action (1999). Brinkley also points out an important difference between selection and censorship: Selection is the act of carefully choosing works for an English course that will be age-appropriate, meaningful, and fulfill objectives, while censorship is the act of excluding works that some con... ...
Postman says that if education is to survive, it must have an end. In this essay, we will discuss what these ends are, and how they compare with the “ends” of John Dewey. Dewey believes that it is the very nature of life is to strive to continue being alive, and that education is the most important way to achieve that. Postman says that the learning process should never really ever end. These two educational philosophers, when you examine them, actually have similar theories.
...ually throughout the processes of the theory, certain words and definitions need to be decided on and kept. Confusion prevails when the terms and ways to understand the theory are continually changing.
These questions can range from trivial mind benders to full-length proofs, so preparation becomes a key element for success in the field. One useful text to help students new to the field prepare is “Art and Craft of Problem Solving” by Paul Zeitz, and this text will be the primary source for metaphors to be referenced in this essay. But why would there be any need to find metaphors in a mathematics textbook? Well, similar to other complicated fields, problem solving relies heavily on metaphor to explain certain concepts because, as Zeitz states in the prologue of his textbook, “Some branches of mathematics have very long histories, with many standard symbols and words. Problem solving is not one of them” (Zeitz 3). In fact, at least in the case of Zeitz, metaphor is a necessity for imparting an understanding of problem solving concepts on readers because some of these problem solving concepts are so abstract. As such, an understanding of metaphor is extremely useful in the understanding of the heuristics for solving a problem, analyzing metaphors which are naturally involved with word problems for the intended direction of the problem, and understanding the common theorems and other tools
This does not happen overnight but is a process of ongoing professional learning that involves learning, understanding, and changing over time”. Readers are constantly assaulted by language that is not just unclear, but often deliberately deceptive and manipulative. Students need tools for unmasking the true purposes of language within a particular context being able to understand its true meaning and, as necessary, free themselves from its pernicious effects. Some critical literacy strategies are: problem posing, juxtaposing;students come to an understanding of point of view. Two texts on a similar topic (e.g., editorials) are set side by side so that students can compare author’s bias, perspective and intent as well as strategies used to influence the reader/viewer, switching; getting students to consider the impact of alternative, perspectives; to identify which voices are present and which voices are missing from a text.Critical literacies involve people using language to exercise power, to enhance everyday life … and to question practices of privilege and
"Kids pick up swear words from a variety of sources, ranging from an older sibling to the bus driver to a rented video movie" (Parents 1). Adults may not be too comfortable with this new vocabulary that children are engaging in and they will want it to stop. Foul language is a sensitive topic for many adults, however, vulgar language can engage many readers by hearing the author’s expressions and how they truly feel. "It allows individuals and organizations to criticize their government's policies, report on matters of public interest, and generally express opinions on any given subject” (Freedom 1). Also, students can better understand this material when it’s coming from a teacher who understands it better than they do. "... exposure to controversial material is not as critical as the war in which it is presented by the teacher" (Young 3). Controversial material such as inappropriate language makes the reader relate to the subject at