Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effect of colonialism
Negative effects of colonialism
Negative effects of colonialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effect of colonialism
Colonization is when a central government, particularly one with higher power than the other, dominates a specific area of land or country. In history Europe tried to colonize specific areas of Africa, while both positive and negative influences came from this experience, the only changes developed by the African people were generally negative. If the United States planned to colonize South America the end result would overall be negative. South America should not be colonized seeing as the lives of the people would be taken over, or majorly altered, and the positive results from the colonization would only benefit the United States.
With new leaders coming into any country to colonize them to their own ways and beliefs, there will always be
…show more content…
There were things built that only benefitted the colonizing country and at times that country put in their own people to makes decisions in favor of them. When Europe was trying to colonize Africa, they implanted features and aides that could not be provided by the country alone, but these things mainly benefitted the European people (World History Patterns of Interaction, 2009, pg. 784). This ultimately turns into a negative impact for the colonized country. If the United States colonized South America they would take advantage of their resources and find ways to use them for their benefit only. Although the South American resources are not the only thing that would benefit the United States, they would add specific people into the court system to formulate all decisions that need judging and make it in favor of the United States. When Europe was trying to colonize Africa, it is stated in the novel Things Fall Apart that, “Courts of Equality took place of local customs to determine judicial matters and ensured that local politics and economic activities favored British” (Things Fall Apart, 2012, pg 19). Not only will the resources be taken from South America if colonized by the United States, but their freedoms and the justice they deserve will also be limited if not taken fully by them. Any issue brought …show more content…
When Europe tried to colonize Africa in the textbook World History Patterns of Interaction it states, ”...colonialism reduced local welfare...some colonies improved sanitation and provided hospitals...lifespans increased” (World History Patterns of Interaction, 2009, pg. 784). With colonizing South America it may bring these wonderful things to them that were not a possibility of providing on their own. This will allow for the GDP to increase and the unemployment and fatality rate to decrease. Although this is a possibility of a positive outcome of the colonization, how much of the country would be included in the gain with these things? Also, how long would the United States be able to provide and help with these benefits? In the past when Europe was trying to colonize Africa, because of the difficulty of being able to support a family under the new enforcement of European rules and employment options, men were forced to leave their homes to be able to provide for their family (World History Patterns of Interaction, 2009, pg. 784). Even though the United States could provide these positive possibilities, the long term effect of colonizing South America would still be overall a bad decision to make because people would still be forced out of
The colonization of Africa gave the Europeans more workers and workspace that boost them economically and financially. According to Document D, many African colonies exports very many resources such as cotton for fabrics and various foods for processing and meals. The help of African colonies was very beneficial to Europe. The economical growth can be proven with Document E, where the amount of exports from Africa grew from less than 5 million British pounds in 1854 to over 20 million in 1900. So the most beneficial part of the African colonies was the boost they gave Europe in economical
Throughout the course of history, nations have invested time and manpower into the colonizing and modernizing of more rural governments. Imperialism has spread across the globe, from the British East India Company to France’s occupation of Northern Africa. After their founding in 1776, the United States of America largely stayed out of this trend until The Spanish-American War of 1898. Following the war, the annexation and colonization of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines ultimately set a precedent for a foreign policy of U.S. imperialism.
Colonization in Latin America had a major effect on the Americas because the Aztecs died of the disease that the Europeans brought over though the Columbian Exchange. Since the Aztecs could not do much about the diseases that were spreading a lot of them began to die. The evidence from the pictures show that the Columbian Exchange took place during the 16th century. (doc 1). A lot of the Aztecs got sick and died. People could not do much about the diseases because they did not know what kind of disease it was. The Aztecs were also not immune to any of the disease that were spreading. Those are some reasons why the colonization in Latin America had a major effect on the Natives.
America was originally colonized because European countries were looking for an easier way to the Indies. This brings forth the thought that colonization made life easier for the Europeans. It brought luxuries and items that were needed to countries that requested them and it encouraged more trade throughout the countries. Though this was advantageous for the Europ...
Imperialism is when a mother nation takes over another nation and become its colony for political, social, and economical reasons. Imperialism is a progressive force for both the oppressors (mother country) and the oppressed (colony), majorly occurring during the late 19th and early 20th century. It had more negative effects than positive effects due to its domination to other nations.
A true saying is “Colonization often does more damage than contribution.” Colonialism encouraged Africa’s development in some areas, but in many others it severely damaged the natural progress of the continent. If colonialism was never imposed on Africa, Africa’s developments would be significantly different and many of the problems that the continent faces now would not exist today. In conclusion, at first it seems that colonialism has both positive and negative effects, but the truth is it only damages the colonized nation.
Rough Draft Throughout the fifteenth and sixteenth century there was a great expansion into the European exploration and colonization of North America. Many Europeans sought to change their lives in the new world. Here, they could start a new life, and live free of the religious persecution occurring in Europe. The British were one of the main European groups who settled and colonized North America.
Although imperialism helped the colonized people by improving the economy and the lives of the people, for the most part imperialism hurt the colonized people because the people were forced to grow cash crops which led to death by starvation.
American Expansionism and Imperialism did more bad than good, mostly out of selfish ambition. Because of the problems that happened during the late 1800s, numerous people, both whites and natives, died. They died mainly because of the land. None of the problems would have happened if both sides were patient with each other and understanding, but that is not how history works.
Césaire states that “colonization works to decline the colonizer, to brutalize him in the truest sense of the word, to degrade him, to awaken him to buried instincts, to covetousness, violence, race hatred and moral relativism” (Césaire, 173). This can be seen
Similarly, we can look at the colonization of Latin America as a "business." Each country is like a global conglomerate, looking to make their "company" as wealthy as possible. This wealth and power was obtained through the exploitation of the people. For instance, if Spain decided to be legitimate in relation to the indigenous people, another country such as Portugal would end up being more powerful through power and control. In the same way, if a company decided to "play by the book", they would know another company would eventually be more powerful and wealthier than them in the future due to exploitation. A kind of "If we don't do it, they will" mindset. In a sense, the desire for power over other countries leads to the exploitation of the indigenous people either way. Stern explains that free labor was used to gain power and money. "Free labor, cut off from access to the means of production, has no al...
The Effects of Colonization on the Native Americans Native Americans had inherited the land now called America and eventually their lives were destroyed due to European colonization. When the Europeans arrived and settled, they changed the Native American way of life for the worse. These changes were caused by a number of factors including disease, loss of land, attempts to export religion, and laws, which violated Native American culture. Native Americans never came in contact with diseases that developed in the Old World because they were separated from Asia, Africa, and Europe when ocean levels rose following the end of the last Ice Age. Diseases like smallpox, measles, pneumonia, influenza, and malaria were unknown to the Native Americans until the Europeans brought these diseases over time to them.
Scholars have debated not only the nature of Iberian colonialism, but also the impact that independence had on the people of Latin America. Historian Jaime E. Rodriguez said that, “The emancipation of [Latin America] did not merely consist of separation from the mother country, as in the case of the United States. It also destroyed a vast and responsive social, political, and economic system that functioned well despite many imperfections.” I believe that when independence emerged in Latin America, it was a positive force. However, as time progressed, it indeed does cause conflict.
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything.
In order to properly understand the effects of colonization, one must look at its history. Most of Africa was relatively isolated from Europe throughout early world history, but this changed during the 17th to the 20th centuries. Colonization efforts reached their peak between the 1870s and 1900 in the “Scramble for Africa” which left the continent resembling a jigsaw puzzle Various European powers managed to colonize Africa including Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Portugal, and Spain. This intense imperialist aggression had three major causes. The primary reason was simply for economic gain. Africa is refuge to vast, unexplored natural resources. European powers saw their opportunity and took it. Another motive was to spread the Christian religion to the non-Christian natives. The last major incentive was to demonstrate power between competing European nations. African societies did try to resist the colonial takeover either through guerilla warfare or direct military engagement. Their efforts were in vain, however, as by the turn of the century, only Liberia and Ethiopia remained not colonized. European powers colonized Africa according to the guidelines established by the Berlin Act (1885). Many of the colonized nations were ruled indirectly through appointed governor...