Are neat people inferior to sloppy people? This question’s answer will differ depending on the type of person you ask. According to Britt in her essay, “Neat people vs. sloppy people”, the answer is yes. She uses certain qualities, such as oral description to differentiate neat people and sloppy people, how neat people are lazier, and how neat people are wasteful. Her qualities help explain to the readers why she thinks that her answer is true.
One quality Britt uses in her essay is oral description, to tell her readers how neat people and sloppy people are in her eyes. In one example, Britt tells her readers, “Neat people are lazier and meaner than sloppy people.” (Britt 233) Britt also uses verbal description to support her essay when she writes, “Sloppy people aren’t really sloppy. Their sloppiness is merely the unfortunate consequence of their extreme moral rectitude.” (233) One last example Britt uses this quality, to make neat people inferior to sloppy people, is when she states, “Neat people are bums and clods at heart. They have cavalier attitudes toward pos...
This paper willbegin analyzing the relationship between social classdistinctio n and hygiene using the metaphoric analysis method. Thiswill be done by first analyzing Huxley's piece as a whole, by analyzingboth text and metaphors. Hopefully this will reveal his true meaning ofthe piece. Next will be the identification of various metaphors that pertainto the research question. Then the metaphors will be broken down into thetenors and vehicles. After that, they will be analyzed and sorted by meaning.By doing this, hopefully the research question will be better explained,and the relationship between cleanliness and upper class will be clarified.
However, “The Coddling of the American Mind” is not an informative piece, as it is filled with opinions and methods of emotional persuasion towards the author's belief upon the topic. The rhetorical device pathos is abundant towards the end of the article where the author is dependent on negative connotations and emotionally captivating statements in order to convey the idea that students should be aware of the potential to be offended and accepting of it as a part of life. Lukianoff and Haidt's negative vocabulary can be seen through words such as “Blaming” and “catastrophizing”; these words are synonymous with overreacting or the inability to accept and negatively impact the opposing side's argument about student anxiety. Negative connotative vocabulary alongside statements directed towards the reader's emotions such as, “In June, a professor protecting himself with a pseudonym wrote an essay for Vox describing how gingerly he now has to teach. “I’m a Liberal Professor, and My Liberal Students Terrify Me,” the headline
For example, in the first paragraph Eighners states that he researched the word “Dumpster” by writing to the Merriam-Webster to discover the origin of the word belongs to the “Dempster Dumpster,” (55). This is evident that the author is an educated individual which is not something the reader might have expected about a homeless person. By doing this, Eighner is grabbing the reader’s attention and steering them away from the fact that he has a low socioeconomic status. According to the third paragraph, Eighner also asserts his preference over the word “scavenging” than “dumpster diving” by stating that he likes “the frankness of the word” that makes it sound like an “honorable niche” (55). In this case, the author is being honest and not ashamed of his status or of the way society may perceives him as. He believes that being a scavenger is something he feels honorable about, and not something others may pity him for. This assertion makes the reader create a greater sense of respect for the author because Eighner is being honest and accepting his way of living by owing to what he has “learned as a scavenger,” (55). The reader may not expect the author to feel pride in being a scavenger, but Eighner emphasizes his perception in hopes of gaining the readers trust and respect to prove that
Talbot uses powerful diction to get her message across in ways which normal writing and syntax could not achieve. Examples range from “...sneaky way of gaming the system” (223) and “...criticized as palaces of privilege” (229) and “...the contest for valedictorian offers a pleasing image of a purer meritocracy” (231). All of these following examples of powerful language depict to the reader the importance of the topic and to stress the author’s message. The rhetoric adds to stress certain points which are very critical in her message. Without the strong dialect the message could be weakened and even worse in the end it could be depicted wrong. On top of all the syntax and diction along with the rhetorical appeals brings the reader to the author’s overall message of needing to reward the best in a different way than normal but making sure that we still do reward
Worthern has created a sincere and serious tone to persuade her audience the importance of etiquette. The use of word choices like “stand up”, “vigilant defense” and “protect” shows her passion of establishing etiquette to include the “disempowered minorities” as well as to be the “guardians of civilization” due to the positive and protective connotation of the words. She also adopts a calming and informative tone to explain the significance and historical background of maintaining a respectful environment for both students and professors instead of creating an authoritative tone to doctrine and warn the students to discontinue their improper behavior. On the other hand, Wade adopts a demanding and sarcastic tone insisting upon the reader the proper behaviors of college students through colloquial language. The use of colloquial language although is effective because Wade’s intended audience is direct to students, she begins her list of “10 Things Every College Professor Hates” by the admonitory word “Don’t” which creates a satiric mood for the whole article. Wade coerces the reader to admit and accept her argument by appealing to the audiences’ guiltiness and criticizing the audience’s behaviors in academic environment. For example, “No, you didn’t miss anything
...stic things in order to live a better, more sound, and overall healthier life. Juxtaposition makes the audience want to follow through with the purpose. Exemplification causes the audience to realize the extent of their materialistic nature. A definition of the average homeless person’s terms allows him to build his ethos and consequently allow the audience to believe and follow his purpose. A majority of people are a part of the middle class, and this majority tends to judge the poor for their lifestyle whether it be through Dumpster diving or begging on the streets. However, as proven by the essay, these people have no right to do so because the poor do, in reality, have a greater sense of self than these middle-class people, similar to the rich. The middle-class citizens must no longer act the victim; instead, they should be working on becoming more sentimental.
“On Not Saying ‘I do’” and “For Better, For Worse” have diverse writing styles. First, Dorian Solot’s essay is in first person. Solot states, “I must have missed the day in nursery school when they lined up all the little girls and injected them with the powerful serum that made them dream of wearing a white wedding dress” (490). This sentence is an example of how Solot’s writing style is mostly in first person. However, Stephanie Coontz’s essay is in third person. Coontz states, “As late as the 1960s, two-thirds of college women in the United States said they would marry a man they didn’t love if he met all their, often economic, criteria” (497). This is an example of a sentence where Coontz’s writing style is in third person. Second, Solot’s writing style is very personal. Solot discusses her personal ideas, experiences, and focuses. Solot explains, “In my early twenties, about three years into my relationship with my partner, Marshall, the occasional subtle hints that my family and friends were ready for an engagement announcement became decided...
reputation. His rejection of societal limitations and steadfast individualism was truly commendable, however, his mannerisms were extremely rude. He cast aside all tact and consideration of others because he was so consumed with himself. “He coldly and fully stated his opinion without affecting to believe that it was the opinion of the company. It was of no consequence, if every one present held the opposite opinion.” (p. 1237) The motivations for a number of his decisions seem unclear. Integrity and discipline can be easily confused with conceit and narcissism. The extent of his appeal can be argued because his actions can be interpreted in a negative or positive light, depending on the audience.
In “Good Country People” there are two characters who believe that they are superior to others. Mrs. Hopewell describes herself as having “no bad qualities of her own” (DiYanni pg.189). She also takes it upon herself to categorize the people she meets as either, “good country people” or “trash,” (pg.188, 189).There do not seem to be any shades of grey in her thinking. Joy/Hulga Hopewell also sees herself as superior, but her superiority lies in her intellect. She makes it known that were it not for her ill health she would be at a university teaching people who “knew what she was talking about” (pg. 191). Although Joy/Hulga believes herself to be intellectually superior she is fooled by the Bible salesman to such an extent that he is able to steal her wooden leg (pg. 200).
In the article, “O’Connor’s A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Doyle W. Walls, the author writes about how judgmental the grandmother is and how her actions lead up to her family’s death. Her southern side comes out as her character is building when she calls a little boy a cute “little pickaninny.” As much as the grandmother portrays herself as a good woman and a leader, her actions contradict everything she wants people to believe. The grandmother talks to her grandchildren telling them that they should be good people by listening and showing respect. Walls writes, “The grandmother has just been lecturing her grandchildren concerning
When pondering about what an individual thinks of you, people have varying views. Some people are not concerned; to others it is the most critical matter on their mind. The feeling of being judged is a very potent emotion. Likewise, conformity is one of the largest controversies in today’s society; the behavior of someone in accordance with socially accepted conventions or standards. So if someone personally made his or her expectations on what you should be like evident, would you change? In Matthew Quick’s The Silver Linings Playbook, he illustrates that judgment and expectations conform a person into someone they are not due to their personal identity. This can be seen through a character’s loyalty to another, dominance and the vulnerability it includes, and a character’s love and devotion. Conformity and the reasons for its appearance will be analyzed through samples from Matthew Quick’s bestselling novel.
One of Hill’s common motifs is the use of the word “stuff.” By using this word, Hill reminds them of his main idea, and helps him relate to the audience. Not only does everyone have “stuff,” but he shows that it is not important. Hill also uses the phrase “editing out,” which is a clean, concise way to explain his topic. This phrase has a positive connotation, and thus the audience will think more positively about his topic. To maintain his casual word choice, Hill uses words such as “nope, among other things, couple, and pretty happily.” All these word choices relax the audience, while Hill places some formal words throughout his speech such as “digitized, extraneous, and editing” to show his knowledge of the topic. Hill is able to use varied words to create a comprehensive, clear speech. He maintains his semi-formal word choice throughout to keep the audience interested, yet
For instance, when Micawber writes his letters of woe expressing his desire to pay his creditors, he is most eloquent, but his actions speak louder than his words do. In her critical paper “The Long History of “In Short”: Mr. Micawber, Letter-Writers, and Literary Men, “ Laura Rotunno argues that, “Micawber...accentuates what the letter-writers promise: wealth, wisdom, and security if one believes in and obeys society's rules. The result...is that his letters capture just how far removed...social success is from the life of Victorian laborers and debtors” (Rotunno, 426). In other words, Micawber tells the recipient of his appeal for help whatever he feels is necessary to open their wallet to assist him out of his present financial difficulty. He promises that he will become a new man over and over, but continues to waste every opportunity of success that crosses his path.
One group, The Jocks, is the show-off type of people who puts off their homework assignments until the last minute. Once the assignment is completed at the last minute, the assignment is usually scored a low grade. The reason for this is because the jocks are always partying, going out on dates, or having fun with their sorority. The jocks wear anything to include torn jeans/shirts, work down sneakers or boots and cheap, expensive-looking jacket.
Sometimes, people may not be the best in character, and their values may be superficial in nature. Although this may be the case, these people may have a reason for their questionable character. These people may have been treated poorly before, or their influences make them poor characters. Such is Gwendolen Fairfax in Oscar Wilde’s play, The Importance of Being Ernest. To the audience, she may seem to be someone shallow, dishonest, or even insincere. The audience is most likely correct, although if one pays attention, one may realize the reason why Gwendolen has such a character. Throughout the play, Wilde shows how Gwendolen’s trivial and insincere character is influenced by her mother and the people around her, as well as the result of