Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Holocaust in short
Nazi’s: should they still be accused The Holocaust is a event that many will never forget, millions of Jews were killed. Hitler was taking over, he was the highest authority and right under him were the Nazi’s, listening to everything he said. Nazi’s commited many crimes against the Jews, and now the people want to try them in court because of the crimes. Should the Nazi’s be tried for the crimes they did? It happened over 70 years ago meaning that they are probably 90 years old now. Also, if you think about it, the crimes were never illegal at the time since Hitler was in power. Every Nazi should be punished for the crimes, but not every Nazi was taking part in these horrid activities. The Nazi’s shouldn’t be tried for the crimes they …show more content…
If this is the case then the Nazi’s are in their 90’s and they are going to die soon. From a religious point of view, when they die it will be their punishment because God will not let them into heaven. Also, they are so old that they won’t even remember what they did or if they are sentenced to prison then they wouldn’t last long. Instead of taking space up in prisons with people that are going to die soon. You can arrest the people committing crimes now. Not only should they not be accused because they are old, but also the crimes were never illegal at the time. Since Hitler was in power during the Holocaust, these hate crimes were never really illegal. In fact, Hitler was the one ordering people around commit the crimes against the Jews. The Nazi’s were just being told what to do, they were brainwashed by Hitler and his ideas. They should have a say in what happened during that time. On the contrary, Every Nazi should be charged, even if they were scared, brainwashed, or if they followed Hitler’s ideology. The Nazi’s should be given charges for these crimes. Correct? No. As a matter of fact, not every Nazi was taking part in these dreadful activities. You never know if the person was just in charge of taking out the trash, or doing the laundry. It’s not right to accuse someone of something they didn’t
For one, it is clear they thought little about verbal apologies from the Nazis for the atrocities they had committed in the
“And so he remained for more than half an hour, lingering between life and death, writhing before our eyes.” If the Nazis were ok with “hanging a child in front of thousands of onlookers”, who knew what they were capable of?
Or they asserted that they were just being directed (Rensmann 170). This is actually unethical, he said. It is obvious that the responsibility is not able to rest completely on Nazi heads, as it remains apparent that the ordinary German resident was as well among the attempted genocide put in force by the individuals who provided Hitler’s cause. Most people appreciate the Holocaust’s nature, other than they fail to hold the whole country accountable. It remains impracticable to believe that the crime committed could have been focused entirely on one meticulous force movement.
Unfortunately, only a few could be found, and put on trial. Others went on with their lives, enjoying what they had deprived so many others of. Some even continued their profession of being family doctors all around Germany, and many still have the same Anti-Semitic views they had before when they were professional killers. Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. Henson, Cary “Medical ethics and nazi legacy” Jonathan Mann, Volume 8, Page 332-358 January 1, 1993 Gutman Israel, “Encyclopedia of the Holocaust” New York, Simon and Schuster, 1995 Microsoft Encarta 1998, Nuremberg Trials Snyder, Dr. Louis L. Encyclopedia of the Third Reich.
If you have been in a History class you have probably heard of an event that happened after World War Two called the Nuremberg Trials. These trials were conducted by the United States. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson was appointed to lead the trials (Berenbaum). During these trials they charged with Crimes against the Peace, War crimes and Crimes against Humanity (Berenbaum). Many major Nazi leaders committed suicide before officials could hang them or before even being caught. The famous Doctor Goebbels killed his children then him and his wife committed suicide (Berenbaum). Only twelve out of the twenty-two who stood trial were hanged, twelve, while the rest just got prison time. Besides major Nazi officials, Physicians were put on trial, the people who were part of the mobile killing squads, Concentration camp officials, Judges and Executives who sold concentration camps Zyklon B. You can expect that they had many excuses, but m...
Some will say that the Jewish people cannot be held responsible for the crimes committed, because they are the victims. This is not the case, however; the Jewish people could have prevented a great deal of pain and suffering that they experienced. Elie wrote “And thus my elders concerned themselves with all manners of things - strategy, diplomacy,politics, and Zionism - but not with their own fate” (8). The Jewish people had heard of what the Nazis had done to the foreign Jews of Sighet, their town; a Jew had returned and told them, but they refused to listen; they ignored his warnings. Furthermore, the Jewish people had many chances at this time to escape; most notably emigration to another country. The Jewish people ignored the warnings they had received, and their chance to escape; for this reason, they bear a certain degree of responsibility for what
1. The Nazis - that is, the leadership, specifically Hitler - had to decide to
I realize the German people’s complicity. was required in order to enact an efficient system of genocide, but I cannot not. agree with the notion that the Nazis simply provided an outlet by which ordinary Germans were allowed to act on their evil desires. The vast majority of the German people were not willing executioners. However, these people were guilty for failing to protest Hitler’s murderous intentions and policies while there. was still time, and for this, they should be ashamed.
"While fighting for victory the German soldier will observe the rules for chivalrous warfare. Cruelties and senseless destruction are below his standard" , or so the commandment printed in every German Soldiers paybook would have us believe. Yet during the Second World War thousands of Jews were victims of war crimes committed by Nazi's, whose actions subverted the code of conduct they claimed to uphold and contravened legislation outlined in the Geneva Convention. It is this legislature that has paved the way for the Jewish community and political leaders to attempt to redress the Nazi's violation, by prosecuting individuals allegedly responsible. Convicting Nazi criminals is an implicit declaration by post-World War II society that the Nazi regime's extermination of over five million Jews won't go unnoticed.
Even though the past is in the past, we can not let something like this happen again. If a genocide occurs in America, then we have officially failed as a country. This is not something we can forget, this is something life threatening. It comes down to people being too afraid to say anything to stop what was really going on in Germany. Many experiments went on outside Germany by a psychologist named Milgram; his findings were spot on with how the people of Germany went about everything during the Holocaust. Milgram 's experiment shows that when someone has authority, everyone else will do what the person “in charge” says, regardless if it’s right or wrong (Staub).
This shows that the Nazis didn't care about them, they just turned them into subjects. It should be, because of the UN’s definition of genocide, the stages of genocide, and the evidence from the memoir Night. The Nazis were cruel to anyone who didn't look like them, so they thought killing them off would be better for the world. That is a genocide. The way that they treated the Jews was like they were less than human and as if they were objects to be beaten and thrown around.
The Holocaust is one of best-documented events in history, however, nearly 20 percent of Americans still question if the Holocaust ever happened (Darnell). Holocaust denial is defined as the belief or assertion that the Holocaust did not happen or was greatly exaggerated (Google). The Holocaust was a deliberate plan of termination of groups including Jews, Communists, homosexual people, mentally handicapped and non-Aryans. In the Holocaust, Nazis killed six million Jews and six million non-Jewish people. Many Holocaust deniers claim the victims were never intentionally killed, and died coincidently from typhus, starvation or bombings. Deniers also believe the gas chambers were never used to kill large groups of people. According to biblebilievers.org, a website wrote by the editor of the Institute for Historical Review, the doors and windows in the chambers were not “hermetically sealed”. Without this closure, the gas would have escaped the chambers and killed everyone in the area, including Nazis. Holocaust deniers also believe the facts of the Holocaust were extremely exaggerated. A primary resource of the Holocaust, The Diary of Anne Frank, is considered forged due to the fact that portions of the journal were written in ballpoint pen, which was not used at the time the diary was written (“Hoax”).
Even if a suspected Nazi were to be found alive and tried, it would be difficult to come to a conviction. After seventy years, virtually all eyewitnesses have passed away, and most of the documentation destroyed or lost. Additionally, proving that an individual was guilty of a greater crime would be nearly impossible. It is safe to assume that those still alive would have been in their early 20’s during the war and had only been simple guards and low ranking officers, likely guilty of no greater crime. Considering all of these facts, it can be concluded that of the 4,000 names available, a fraction of them can be located, a fraction of those are still alive, and an even smaller fraction deserves to be tried. However, there are some who believe that those affiliated with the third reich in any way should continue to be hunted down. Those who desire most for the Nazi’s to face justice are the survivors of the holocaust. Martin Greenfield describes how he vowed to, “return and kill the [Nazi’s] wife”, after he escaped. This evidence of hatred, among the countless other cases, show the rightful feelings the
== == Werner Lammpe was accused of sending numerous citizens to concentration camps where they were later killed. I feel that he was innocent because he did not have the mens rea to commit these crimes.
The Nuremberg Trials was unethically run and violated the rights of the Nazi leaders who were convicted of committing crimes against humanity. Primarily because the Allies sought to use the trials as a way to remind the Germans, who won the war ‘again’. Thus making it similar to the Treaty of Versailles in (19- ), through implying this notion of “Victors’ Justice”. Nevertheless, the Allies did to an extent ‘try’ to make the tribunal as ethical as possible,