Human Intervention In Making The Environment

Navadarshanam-

Navadarshanam stands as a beautiful example of the human intervention in making the environment sustainable by following the holistic approaches of ecological and spiritual alternatives.

The Debate- “Religious leaders can bring about better sustainability impact than policy makers” There are many better understandings and flaws in every subject. When it comes to the talk of sustainability in the present day world, it’s very much difficult to come up with the opinion of debate without the valid points which meets/address the issues. Addressing the issues related to sustainability are very complex in nature as they are dependent on the factors of scaling and distribution. As these factors are embedded in the society in

Sustainability as a science emerged in the recent 21st century (Wikipedia) which is trying to address various issues and interactions between global, social, and human systems, the complex mechanisms that lead to degradation of these systems, and concomitant risks to human well-being. Most of the sustainability problems are addressed by the researchers, academicians, practitioners and the policy makers. The question of the impact and implement of sustainability changes still remains as the most challenging. The challenge is of the existing policies and the way in which the present world is bounded by the unsustainable practices. These may/can be addressed by the new policies with proper studies and they can act as the effective tools to bring better change in the society. And everybody come under the purview of the policies and these cannot be interrupted and manipulated in certain ways somebody need. The point of sustainable development is not to focus too much on the environment, a cause that often appears to be a luxury only the well-off can worry about, but to include it as a part of the fight against poverty that requires the

The evolution of religious leaders and religion has many conflicts in itself as they failed to address the questions of equity and misbeliefs. Basavanna and Ambedkar stand as the best example for which they voiced for equity and other misconceptions of the religion. As Obiefuna & Uzoigwe tells that Religion is then seen as dysfunctional to development nonetheless, underpins and gives force to ethnicity and culture and that often leads to the loss of lives and property. We see many religious conflicts occurring in the world which remain unaddressed by these religions and by their religious leaders. Many of the religious leaders now acts as a political object and identities which has forgotten the basic values and morality of the religion and most of them are failing in implementing them. There are very less instances that religious leaders spoke about the problems in the society and very few had tried (?) To address them. Most of them never bothered about the problems and always looked into preaching and increasing the number of followers. As religions are diverse, likewise the religious leaders are also very diverse with their own set of preachings, following and ideologies. We should make a point that if we speak religion, it's not the one its many in itself. And these religious leaders take the chance misinterpret and manipulate