Nature Vs Nurture Theory Of Serial Killers

1217 Words3 Pages

Serial Killers Are serial killers born with the need to kill, or is it something that they learn to do as they grew up? There are many theories as to why people become serial killers, but most are associated with the Nature vs. Nurture Theory. Many side with the nurture theory believing that serial killers are created from horrible childhood traumas like unstable households and abusive parents. While other people choose the opposite side of the spectrum: biological factors. Psychologist try to examine the brain of a serial killer through the use of MRI scans, conversations, and genetics in order to find abnormalities in the brain. Whichever side of the theory one may take, one has to be aware that not all serial killers are the same. Serial killers are separated into three or more different typologies: psychopathic sexual sadist, visionary serial killer, and the mission serial killer (Miller, Part I, 2013). According to the FBI’s operational definition, a serial killer is someone who kills at least three people over a short period of time accompanied with a “cooling off” period. (Miller, Part 1, 2013). The “cooling off” period is the time the serial killer takes to remember and fantasize about the murder just committed before moving on to the next one. Many serial killers share …show more content…

A visionary serial killer, also known as a psychotic killer, suffers from reality breaks, believing he or she is creating a better outcome in the world when the murder is committed. The greater force can be from God which gives permission to murder all the “unworthy people.” On the other hand, it could also be from the Devil which makes the serial killer commit murder in order to save his or her own life (Miller, Part I, 2013). Because visionary serial killers have ideal victims, they pick up the closest look alike person; making them unorganized and easy to track down (Bonn,

More about Nature Vs Nurture Theory Of Serial Killers

Open Document