Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nature vs nurture debate
Nurture vs nature argument
Nurture vs nature argument
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nature vs nurture debate
Whether or not how everyone’s individual personality is either predetermined by their genetics and hormones or is developed by external factors encountered from birth and as we age. That is the debate in the discussion of nature vs. nurture. Nature being that it is predetermined and caused by our genetics and nurture meaning it is caused by external factors we face throughout our lives. I am an eighteen years old female with an introvert personality. I am the kind of person who can spend several days alone in my room on the internet and have just as much fun as spending a couple days out with my closest friends on an exciting adventure. I was born to two loving parents at hospital in Miami but I have lived in the city of Coral Springs for …show more content…
When I meet new people I tend to be very quiet, respectful, and polite. Once I become more comfortable with the person I tend to speak louder, joke around, and ramble on about things. I am a very patient person and usually am able overcome my anger by reasoning through the situation. I tend to be a bit absent minded because I frequently get distracted and lost in my own thoughts. I am a caring person. I really enjoy doing things that will make others happy for example buying presents, baking, and why I choose to be a comedian at times. I do not have a set dress style at the moment. I enjoy wearing a variety of clothing whether that be all black form head to toe or a yellow and white sunflower dress with a pair of wedges. I also have a combination of loose and form fitting clothes with no real preference. When I buy clothes I look for something that catches my eye is reasonably priced and I liked the way it fit. Although I do not know what my dress style is exactly I do know that I despise any clothes with profanity or inappropriate images as well as clothing and accessories with the brand name all over …show more content…
The way I was raised by my parents and events that I faced throughout my life shaped my personality into what it is today. Although I was born to two outgoing parents I am a very shy person who prefers staying home and avoids parties. My parent’s protectiveness caused my enjoyment in spending my time alone. My experiences with friends have caused me to be selective when it comes to making friends. My exposure to culture caused me to relate to the western culture more than my Hispanic heritage. This paper has also helped me get to know myself and how other see me a little better. The paper should be structured as follows: 1. describe nature vs nurture in your own words. 2. Who are you? What is your background? What is your culture? What type of family were you raised by? 3. Describe your attitude, describe your behavior, describe your dress style, and describe your job. How do you describe yourself? How would others describe you? (Family, friends, enemies, significant others, employer, teachers?) 4. Describe whether you attribute the overall person that you have become to nature or nurture and discuss why 5. Write a summary conclusion of what you have learned about yourself after wri ting this paper. The completed paper must be submitted in
In this paper I will be sharing information I had gathered involving two students that were interviewed regarding education and their racial status of being an Asian-American. I will examine these subjects’ experiences as an Asian-American through the education they had experienced throughout their entire lives. I will also be relating and analyzing their experiences through the various concepts we had learned and discussed in class so far. Both of these individuals have experiences regarding their education that have similarities and differences.
The discussion as to whether nature or nurture were the driving force shaping our cognitive abilities, was for a long time considered interminable. In the 18th century, Locke and the English empiricists claimed that individuals were born with a tabula rasa and only experience could establish mind, consciousness and the self. On the continent, Leibniz envisaged the self as a monad carrying with it some knowledge of a basic understanding of the world. Until the 1960s, this dispute was still very vivid in the behavioral sciences: B. F. Skinner's school of behaviorism in the USA postulated (as reflexology did earlier) general rules for all types of learning, neglecting innate differences or predispositions. K. Lorenz was one of the protagonists of ethology in Europe, focusing on the inherited aspects of behavior. It was Lorenz who ended the antagonistic view of behavior in showing that there indeed are innate differences and predispositions in behavior where only little learning occurs. Today, it is largely agreed upon that nature and nurture are intimately cooperating to bring about adaptive behaviors. Probably only in very few cases ontogenetic programs are not subjected to behavioral plasticity at all. Conversely, the possibility to acquire behavioral traits has to be genetically coded for.
How adoption and twin studies have influenced the “nature verses nurture debate” has been a focal point for many researchers and people around the world which has caused controversy and many views regarding the topic. “Twin studies look into behaviour in identical and none identical twins and adoption studies separate the effect of nature from nurture, or at least do more successfully than twin studies.” ("The Usefullness of Twin Studies and Adoption Studies | psuea7", 2011, p.1) These studies are used to provide plenty of strong and reliable evidence that and positively influence the Nature vs. Nurture debate. “The Nature vs. Nurture debate is the scientific, cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behaviour, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture. Nature is often defined in this debate as genetic or hormone-based behaviours, while nurture is most commonly defined as environment and experience.” (("Nature vs. Nurture", 2014, p.1) Many controversial debates have surrounded this issue and many researchers are trying to find evidence to justify if twin and adoption studies have an effect on the nature vs. nurture debate. Twin and adoption studies have had a positive influence on the nature-nurture debate because research and evidence has identified different issues and quality information to help the nature-nurture debate evolve. This essay will outline these positive influences and will elaborate on the research and evidence that has helped the nature-nurture debate. The three influences of twin and adoption studies that will be discussed are the influence of researching the affects of behavioural issues such as schizophrenia, the influence of undergoing research on the drinking affects an...
As an adolescent, there were countless times that I disagreed with my parents. Ninety-Nine percent of the time I argued with my parents, just for the sake of an argument. I know that after almost every argument I can remember muttering to myself, that I will never treat my kids as my parents did. To fulfill this teenage fantasy I will need to overcome two giant hurdles. First, my nature or genetic makeup comes from my parents. Also, the environment that I’m raised in or nurtured in is solely with my parents. In the following, I will discuss my views on how nature and nurture both contribute to who I am.
An emerging trend among today’s employers is the increased focus on the personality traits of their employees. Whether that focus is on the ability to hire the right person by predicting job performance, or discovering the right “fit” for an employee in a team, a company’s success may depend on these factors. Creating the right team based for the best success of the team is crucial. However, due to project constraints, abilities, market place, etc, the ability to pair the right individuals may not be available.
The nature vs. nurture theory takes a huge role in determining how a child will grow and develop within the society. A child will develop their own values and morals that are generated by how they were raised in their environment.
The debate on nature versus nurture has existed for thousands of years. Ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle formed the argument through conflicting beliefs on the basics of human knowledge. Plato felt wisdom was innate, that all people were born with knowledge, and their experiences only helped to remind them of what they once knew. Aristotle challenged this through his belief of obtaining information through experiences. He viewe...
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
Throughout this autobiography I want to go through everything in my life that has changed me because of a cultural influence. I will tell my journey through growing up and trying to get a grip on and understand my heritage and make it to present day where I experience culturally different individuals daily.
One of the most well-known debates in psychology is nature versus nurture. Nature is pre-determined traits, influenced by biological factors and genetics. Physical characteristics such as height, hair color, and eye color is all determined by the genetics we inherit. Nurture is the influence of environmental factors. Nature and nurture affects the physical, emotional, and social development of a child.
On the other hand, if nurture is more important, then our experiences are likely to be particularly significant, and we may be able to flexibly alter our personalities over time. Evidently, genetics has a greater influence on a person’s personality than environmental factors and cultural influences.
Traits and personality are things that people are born with. Many scientist have shown an interest in what the real factors are that creates a person’s individual personality traits. Human personality has been in constant debate on what influences it the most, nature or nurture. This debate can date back to the Aristotle and Plato time and continues with support for both sides today. Human beings can be genetically lined to fear the unknown and laugh out loud, or be bald, but they are capable of learning to hate reading, love tea, and tell lies as opposed to the truth.
Although there are many debatable topics psychologists tend to discuss, the Nature versus Nurture deliberation is, among society, one of the most widely known of them all. Many people have their own view on the subject however, I personally believe nature versus nurture is the question of whether human thought and behavior is influenced by environmental factors or genetic factors.
The controversy of nature vs. nurture has been going on for many years, and a
The Meaning of Nature and Nurture in Psychology The nature nurture dichotomy is a theme always present in many areas