Nature Vs Nurture Debate

1019 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on social learning theory

The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest philosophical issues within psychology. So what exactly is the nature versus nurture debate all about?
Nature refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are from our physical appearance to our personality characteristics.
Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture Chery 2010). The fanatics of this theme believe that all of our characteristics and behaviors are the result of advancement. Heritable behaviors handed down from parents influence the individual differences that make each person distinctive. Other well-known …show more content…

Take the position that all or most behaviors and characteristics result from learning. Behaviorism is a good example of a theory entrenched in empiricism. The behaviorists believe that all actions and behaviors are the results of conditioning. Theorists such as John B. Watson believed that people could be trained to do and become anything, regardless of their genetic background. For example, when a person achieves tremendous academic success, did they do so because they are genetically predisposed to be successful or is it a result of an enriched environment? If a man abuses his wife and kids, is it because he was born with violent tendencies or is it something he learned by observing his parents behavior? A few examples of biologically determined characteristics (nature) include certain genetic diseases, eye color, hair color, and skin …show more content…

You might view nature and nurture different, I said; not really, when you synchronize the two together it gives you the human characteristics. For example, growing up in a culture where family honor, goo values, self-worth, and integrity play a big factors is a proven fact that nurture play a principal role. Within that we also explore the social learning theory by Albert Bandura, where he stated that people mimic others base on they do in front of others. Moreover, you parent can have the most criminal mind ever and committed heinous crimes it does not justified you as a person will be in the same characteristic as them. Individual can inherent psychopathic behavior from their parent, but the environment they live on may change the outcome of his or her situation. “Functionalism emphasizes a societal equilibrium, if something happens to disrupt the order and the flow of the system, society must adjust to achieve a stable state” (Emile Durkheim). Society is a system of interrelated portions where no one part can function without the other. These parts make up the whole of society. If one part changes, it has an impact on society as a whole is it the same system as we see in nature versus nurture. Although, both are essential they will never be in an equal balance because one is always more influential than the other heredity or

Show More
Related

  • Nature Vs. Nurture In The Bad Seed

    446 Words  | 1 Pages

    The nature versus nurture theory is a way to distinguish whether certain traits or characteristics of individuals are impacted more by biological means or environmental means. What the “nature” part signifies in the the theory is that we are more impacted by heredity and biological effects of our personality and what defines us as a person. What “nurture” signifies is that environmental factors have a more powerful impact on our lives and personality. As we mostly know, most things aren’t black and white, and so it’s hard ro determine which type of factors is more effective. Most people believe that it’s a blend of both nature and nurture that makes us who we are.

    Read More

  • Nature Versus Nurture

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the well-received novel “Pudd’nhead Wilson,” Mark Twain skillfully addresses the ancient argument about the origin of one’s character and whether it’s derived from his nature or his surroundings. We can best see this battle between nature versus nurture by inspecting the plot lines that follow the characters Thomas a Becket Driscoll, Valet de Chambre, and Roxana the slave. Thomas was born into a wealthy white family while Roxy birthed Chambers into a life of slavery. It seemed as though each would have gone their separate ways into opposite walks of life, but Roxy secretly swapped the children, which destined each to their counterintuitive fates. Through their words and actions, Tom, Chambers, and Roxy have proven the idea that one’s behaviors and desires are a result of his upbringings and the environment he lives in rather than by his innate nature.

    Read More

  • Nature vs Nurture Theory: Alcoholism

    704 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Nature vs Nurture Theory is one the most controversial debate topics in Psychology. This debate has been going on for years now. The Nature argument is supported by genetics and what is hereditary to a person. Psychologists who support the “nature” theory concentrate on what an individual is born with. For example, they focus on genes, DNA, personality traits and other qualities they just can’t change about themselves. Researches focusing on the results of neurotransmitters of an addict are usually conducted to further support this point. On the other hand, the Nurture argument is supported by events that have influenced a person's decision and way of living. Psychologists who support the “nurture” theory base their arguments by understanding one’s behavior. They focus on personal experiences that mold and shape a person. They also focus on how a person was raised, what and how they were educated in school, and their lifestyle. Usually, psychologists focus on influences like peer pressure and media when it comes to teenagers who turn to drugs or alcohol.

    Read More

  • Nature and Nurture, not Nature vs. Nurture

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    In a study conducted in 1983, researchers studied more than 350 pairs of twins in order to research if human personality traits were largely inherited or learned. Daniel Goleman, author of “Major Personality Study Finds that Traits are Mostly Inherited,” shares with his audience the parameters and results of this elaborate twin study. Goleman introduces his reader to Auke Tellegen, a psychologist and principal researcher on the long-term study, performed at the University of Minnesota, discovered that the human traits most strongly determined by heredity were leadership, obedience to authority, and even traditionalism. He would surely argue that heredity, more than influence of experience, is more responsible for development in human traits. Tellegen may have substantiating facts that nature is more predominant in a mere handful of traits, but what about the several other traits he failed to test? It is possible for a person who shows leadership and obedience during one part of their life to have an experience in which their obedience and leadership is thwarted. The study Tellegen conducted could not have been without environmental influence. Every single one of the participants, whether a twin or not, had environmental experiences separate from the others. Since every person experiences and responds to environmental stimuli differently, how can several prior years of experience be measured in order to present an unbiased result in this study? Unquestionably, it is impossible. Just as this particular study failed to take into consideration a persons’ prior experiences, it also failed to consider the probability of future environmental factors that could affect the traits Tellegen focused on in his study. Although difficu...

    Read More

  • Nature Vs Nresture Essay: Nature Vs. Nurture

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nature vs nurture has been an ongoing debate for many decades among some of the greatest minds in psychology. Everyone is trying to figure out the source of human personality. Does our personality develop primarily by genetics, known as nature or is it based off of our environment and the way we were raised, nature? I believe it is a bit of both, but in my opinion nurture plays a bigger role.

    Read More

  • The Nature Vs. Nurture: Nature Vs. Parents

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    For this first analytical essay, I have decided to have a go at analyzing the Nature Vs. Nurture using my own viewpoint as a sibling. No doubt this is a topic that has been debated to mental death already, but I think it is something I will benefit from thinking about. Also, at the end of my main topic, I will quickly address a topic brushed on in the book.

    Read More

  • What Makes a Serial Killer

    1302 Words  | 3 Pages

    It has been believed for some time that an individual becomes violent because of traumatic childhoods that were wrought with neglect and abuse. Others have argued that one becomes violent because they are mentally deranged. There have been many studies over the years to find out what causes a person to become a serial killer, but still there is no definitive cause. All serial killers are psychopaths (a person with a psychopathic personality, which manifests as amoral and antisocial behavior, lack of ability to love or establish meaningful personal relationships, extreme egocentricity), but not all psychopaths end up being serial killers. There is however, common traits among all psychopaths. These common traits include genetics and environment. Although a psychopath’s personal experience and environment does play a part, studies prove that genetic brain abnormalities or dysfunctions play a huge role in the making of a killer.

    Read More

  • Nature versus Nurture: Criminal Behavior

    2165 Words  | 5 Pages

    The nurturing of individuals plays a role in the making of killers, as 94% of serial killers had experienced some form of abuse as children and 42% have suffered severe physical abuse (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2010). A child abuse is a determining factor, in which supports the idea that serial killers and psychopath, are influenced significantly by nurture (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011). In most cases social, cultural and physiological determinants all play a role in influencing serial killers to grow into a mass murderer. It is important that physiological and social determinants can be identified, so they could be altered for the purpose of preventing the number of crime.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Nature Vs Nurture

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Nature Vs Nurture

    1407 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nature vs Nurture is a very long living debate that has been on the minds of many who study motor development. This can be a very difficult topic to choose a side to argue for because both Nature and Nurture have very strong points which prove they influence the development of a person. Nature refers to the genetic makeup and genetic relations an individual has linked to their birth parents. Nature is strictly about the genetics and the way these genetics make up and influence the way a person develops, behaves and lives their life. Nature refers to heredity and the traits an individual will obtain from their parents that have been passed down from generation to generation. Nurture refers to the environment one lives in and the experiences

    Read More

  • Research Paper On Nature Vs Nurture

    965 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nature by itself can affect a child’s development. If the child is born with a disease or mental illness, they may develop at a slower pace. For example, if a child is born with Asperger’s syndrome, the child will have a difficult time with social skills and understanding emotions. Nurture deals with the environment. If a child was raised in a hostile environment, that child is more likely to be hostile when they get older. Environment may play a larger role in most cases due to everyday lifestyle, from the city you live in to the way you are raised. If one was raised in a healthy house hold, someone who lived in a toxic household may behave differently.

    Read More

  • The Effects of Nature and Nurture on Shaping of Behavior

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nature is the word used to describe the biological aspects that shape behaviour, for example genes. Nurture is the word used to describe the social aspects that shape behaviour, for example interaction with parents. This essay will cover both sides of the argument referring to psychological theory. To start with the psychodynamic theory, this is defined, according to Dictionary.com as “The interaction of various conscious and unconscious mental or emotional processes, especially as they influence personality, behaviour, and attitudes”. This is a theory used on the side ...

    Read More

  • Nature Vs Nurture Essay

    1522 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nature vs nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. It is the scientific cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture. Nature and nurture are both equally important. They are the two are major influences that affect the person you grow to be and will determine what your children will be tomorrow. Nature refers to heredity, which are traits and features that are inherited from your parents and ancestors. At birth you, as a person, inherits 50% of each parent 's genetic material that are passed along through the chromosomes found in the DNA. Hair color, height, body type, and eye color are some examples of characteristics

    Read More

  • Nature Nurture Debate

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Nature Nurture Debate occupies a central role in explaining how both environmental, experiential nature factors and how inborn nurture factors affect the growth, change and development of a child. The debate shows how the course of human development is influenced by numerous experiences early on in life. Psychologists agree that early experiences identify developmental milestones and describe the processes of growth and change that occur in the three childhood domains of development which are physical and perceptual development, socio-emotional development, and cognitive development. I will discuss two of these domains in detail throughout my assignment. Also during my essay, I will discuss the theorists who have contributed their ideas

    Read More

  • Nature-Nurture Debate

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nature versus nurture has been continuously debated throughout the world of human psychology. Since the 17th century philosophers have been trying to decipher this question through research and testing with no winning answer on either side of the debate. So what is the nature versus nurture debate? The nature-nurture debate focuses on whether human beings are born with all their personality characteristics or whether they are acquired via life experiences.

    Read More

More about Nature Vs Nurture Debate

Open Document