Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Does birth order affect personality essay
Does birth order affect personality essay
Nature verses nurture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Does birth order affect personality essay
The argument of nature vs. nurture can go on and on until there is scientific proof as to which is the more dominate factor in personal development. I have always been a supporter of the nurture argument since I believe that a loving, supportive, safe environment yields well-rounded and considerate individuals regardless of their genetic disposition. For example, consider animals that are domesticated vs. those in the wild; a human will easily approach a domesticated animal because it is assumed that they are well-behaved and loving because of the environment it was raised in contrast an individual would not take the same approach with the animal raised in the wild as it is assumed that their behaviors are unpredictable. Twin studies are
always very intriguing but this twin study stood out because of the fact that the twins were separated for 35 years and raised in completely different environments, however they shared many likenesses; both Linda and Doreen like earth tones, floral scents, are exactly the same height, just to name a few. As I reflect on my personal development and the development of my children I believe that having a support system, love, morals, and discipline makes it possible for an individual to grow mentally and emotionally. In short, it is my experience that if nurture embraces nature there is a better chance that an individual will be responsible, confident, accomplished, and considerate where as if nurture hinders nature and individual will be unhappy and possibly emotionally disturbed to say the least.
The nurture argument is based on how a person was raised and nature is the argument
On October 9, 1968, a set of twins were born, but separated at birth and ultimately, put up for adoption. The decision to separate the twins came from the adoption agency who wanted to conduct a nature versus nurture experiment; however, the experiment was conducted in secret. However, for unknown reasons, the experiment never developed to fruition. Unaware the child they adopted was a twin; both sets of parents raised a singular child. Thirty-five years later, one twin began a search for her biological mother through the adoption agency, only to find out that she was born a twin. Upon learning her identity, she reached out to her twin and they began the journey of getting to know one another by comparing characteristics that appeared similar such as temperament and mannerism. They even discovered that they both held positions as a film critic and enjoyed almost identical movies.
The nurture argument is based on how a person was raised and nature is the argument
For this debate as you know already, I am totally on the Nurture side. I think kids are born and influenced by the environment. Even though some kids are born and are not influenced by their surroundings, that is usually a rare case. Like all of this, my personality has been changed as I have been just like identical twins have many differences. So with all of this to wrap it up, studies show that Nurture is more dominant and overpowers Nature. When you have children remember how they are raised will affect them in the long
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
Undoubtedly, humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy over whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has occupied the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough reading of experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to be convinced that nurture does play a far more important in the development of a human than nature.
Nature vs. Nurture The relative contributions of nature and nurture are an apparent part of human development which makes us ask the question, are heredity and environment opposing forces?(Sternberg 100) The question of nature vs. nurture can be examined and can be attempted to be comprehended in many ways. Our stand on which theory is the correct one is obviously a matter of opinion and makes us wonder if only one of them is truly correct. Nurture seems to be the explanation that holds the most tangible evidence to support it as existing in our everyday life. In psychological attempts to conduct experiments of genetic influences on personality and behavior in the environment psychologists have come to the conclusion that the best way is by using identical twins. There are strong similarities identical twins show in intelligence, personality, and many other characteristics, regardless of being raised in separate homes. They leave us with the conclusion that maybe there is some truth to the theory of nature. These findings from the studies done on the twins are what I find to be coincidences. I believe from my past experiences with my development as a person compared to my older sisters, we are a perfect example of nurture. The theory that poses enough evidence through studies and in my personal experience seems to be true. My sister and I, though not twins, have a four year difference between us and are completely different people who are were raised in the same environment....
Is human behaviour, including the propensity for violence, acquired or innate? The supposed dichotomy between nature and nurture captures much of modern thought. Rousseau’s tabula rasa—the notion that each person begins as a blank canvas with no inborn characteristics or propensities—is an extreme expression of the nurture argument. Rousseau maintained that human identity is not inherent in every human being and is shaped only by lived experiences (cite). His view and less extreme arguments that favour nurture over nature maintain that violence and warfare are learned behaviours. If an individual has a violent constitution, nurture arguments say that social and environmental circumstances account for that individual’s makeup. Nurture arguments
Nature is described as our physical attributes and genes from when we are born. Our genetics that make us who we are include our eye colour, height and hair colour, as well as our natural talents, abilities and our intelligence level.
Throughout the history of human existence, there have always been questions that have plagued man for centuries. Some of these questions are “what is the meaning of life” and “which came first, the chicken or the egg”. Within the past 400 years a new question has surfaced which takes our minds to much further levels. The question asked is whether nature or nurture has more of an impact on the growing development of people. It is a fact that a combination of nature and nurture play important roles in how humans behave socially. However, I believe that nature has a more domineering role in the development of how people behave in society with regards to sexual orientation, crimes and violence and mental disorders.
Nature vs nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. It is the scientific cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture. Nature and nurture are both equally important. They are the two are major influences that affect the person you grow to be and will determine what your children will be tomorrow. Nature refers to heredity, which are traits and features that are inherited from your parents and ancestors. At birth you, as a person, inherits 50% of each parent 's genetic material that are passed along through the chromosomes found in the DNA. Hair color, height, body type, and eye color are some examples of characteristics
The nature nurture debate explains the key process of explaining how a child grows, changes and develops. The nature nurture debate is a debate about the contributions of genetics and the environment on human development. ….
The nature vs. nurture debate is about characteristics pertaining to the personality, behavior and intelligence of an individual is it due to genetics, or environment. Now drawing upon a NURTURE assumption, some specific ways in which I think my child’s experiences of my parenting style/choices mattered for her development are, safe environment, intensive school work, and experiences. For instance, I would take Salma to some of the important meetings I have in my work, or after work meet up among coworkers, because I was doing these kind of activities with Salma she started improving way more than the normal developmental rate of socially and emotionally at her age. For example, one of the highlights from my virtual child report is Salma is
To what degree are our behaviors inherited or acquired? This is a constant debate within psychology. Our thoughts, emotions and behaviors that result from nature are those that we are genetically predisposed to. The nurture aspect of the debate consists of the behaviors that are based on the environment, experience, and our upbringing. Our family and culture play a large role in nurturing. Researchers study the nature versus nurture phenomenon through fraternal and identical twins. Fraternal twins share the same environment, but vary in their degree of genetic relatedness. Identical twins that are reared apart share genes in varying degrees but experience different environments. These studies help us to understand the extent to which our genes or our environment can better predict our behaviors.