Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A white heron cliff notes
White heron literary elements
Nature in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A white heron cliff notes
The short story “The White Heron” has a benevolent view of nature and it’s interactions with mankind, as opposed to “The Law of Life” by Jack London. That particular story conveys a message of inevitable death, and an unforgiving nature that demands complete obedience and can only promise one thing to an individual. That they shall meet their impending doom, though none can say where or when. Here, we shall compare and contrast a multitude of different motifs and underlying themes, including the opposition of nature to mankind, the interactions of the protagonists with nature, and the role of the antagonists, whether it is natural or not.
How do you, the reader believe that nature acts regarding mankind? As much as mankind seems to idolize and romanticize nature, sooner or later, we must realize our own naiveté and acknowledge nature as a wild and lethal force independent of man. The truth is that nature has no more regard for man than we might have for a particularly annoying bug. According to Jack London, Nature demands perfection, and anything less deserves death. However, in “The White Heron,” nature is benevolent and peaceful, and you can clearly see the departure from the past ways of the puritans and a clear transition to a blend of romanticism and naturalism form a cohesive and entertaining short story. Nature, and it’s interactions with people are drastically different in the two stories, leading to two vastly different protagonists.
For Instance, in the White Heron, the protagonists is a little girl called Sylvia who grows in her understanding of the world. As she learns more about herself and matures, she realizes the world isn’t always as rosy as she thought, and that if she wants something badly e...
... middle of paper ...
...happily, while the old man is devoured happily by a pack of (no longer) starving wolves. Which do you think has the more realistic outcome in regards to human nature and nature itself?
If you, the reader picked the ending of the White Heron, in which a young and impressionable girl passed up the chance for a substantial amount of money from a boy she was infatuated with, I the author must pronounce you one of two things. Either a hopeless idealist drowning in your own naiveté, or an idiot. Nature is a force that can be vindictive, malevolent, and cruel beyond belief. Of course, it as bipolar as it is majestic, and can be filled with plenty of the necessary resources needed to survive. In “The Law of Life,” Nature itself is an antagonist, whereas in “The White Heron,” it’s a loving friend. Whichever you believe, nature is most certainly not a force to be messed with.
The diction surrounding this alteration enhances the change in attitude from self-loath to outer-disgust, such as in lines 8 through 13, which read, “The sky/ was dramatic with great straggling V’s/ of geese streaming south, mare’s tails above them./ Their trumpeting made us look up and around./ The course sloped into salt marshes,/ and this seemed to cause the abundance of birds.” No longer does he use nature as symbolism of himself; instead he spills blame upon it and deters it from himself. The diction in the lines detailing the new birds he witnesses places nature once more outside of his correlation, as lines 14 through 18 read, “As if out of the Bible/ or science fiction,/ a cloud appeared, a cloud of dots/ like iron filings, which a magnet/ underneath the paper
Throughout the Romanticism period, human’s connection with nature was explored as writers strove to find the benefits that humans receive through such interactions. Without such relationships, these authors found that certain aspects of life were missing or completely different. For example, certain authors found death a very frightening idea, but through the incorporation of man’s relationship with the natural world, readers find the immense utility that nature can potentially provide. Whether it’d be as solace, in the case of death, or as a place where one can find oneself in their own truest form, nature will nevertheless be a place where they themselves were derived from. Nature is where all humans originated,
The novellas, Train Dreams by Dennis Johnson and Good Will by Jane Smiley, are both infused with elements of the natural world. In both novellas nature is portrayed in different ways. The natural world plays significant roles in both Johnson’s Train Dreams and Smiley’s Good Will; these roles differ between the two novellas. On some points, Train Dreams and Good Will portray nature in the same way, but in others their views contradict. In both novellas nature is depicted as a form of livelihood; Grainier makes a living by conquering nature, and the Millers by working with nature. In Train Dreams nature inspires fear, whereas in Good Will nature equates peace.
In Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer explores the human fascination with the purpose of life and nature. Krakauer documents the life and death of Chris McCandless, a young man that embarked on an Odyssey in the Alaskan wilderness. Like many people, McCandless believed that he could give his life meaning by pursuing a relationship with nature. He also believed that rejecting human relationships, abandoning his materialistic ways, and purchasing a book about wildlife would strengthen his relationship with nature. However, after spending several months enduring the extreme conditions of the Alaskan wilderness, McCandless’ beliefs begin to work against him. He then accepts that he needs humans, cannot escape materialism, and can never fully understand how nature functions. Most importantly, he realizes that human relationships are more valuable than infinite solitude. McCandless’ gradual change of heart demonstrates that exploring the wilderness is a transformative experience. Krakauer uses the life and death of Chris McCandless to convey that humans need to explore nature in order to discover the meaning of life.
In 'To Build a Fire,' the man's antagonist is nature: London displays the man's journey as restricted by external forces. First, the temperature of the tundra is seventy-five-below zero (978), which naturally exposes the man?s ?frailty as a creature of temperature? (977). Obviously the man is subject to the forces of winter, and can not change his homeostasis as a warm-blooded animal. Similarly, London employs the ?traps? (979) of snow-covered pools of water to show that while humans may presume we are invincible, nature will stealthily remind us of our vulnerability (through invisible germs, for example). Just as the man does not see the ?trap? (981) that soaks his legs, he fails to notice the dog?s apprehension regarding their journey (981). Here London shows man's self-proclaimed superiority is falsely assumed, as he lacks the ?instinct? (978) that the dog possess; later, the man can not kill the dog (985), which signifies the dog is not subordinate regarding survival. After the man steps in the water, London notes, ?He was angry, and cursed his luck aloud? (981). By attributing his misfortune to ?luck,? the man relieves himself of responsibility, recognizing himself as a victi...
In “The Fish” by Elizabeth Bishop, the narrator attempts to understand the relationship between humans and nature and finds herself concluding that they are intertwined due to humans’ underlying need to take away from nature, whether through the act of poetic imagination or through the exploitation and contamination of nature. Bishop’s view of nature changes from one where it is an unknown, mysterious, and fearful presence that is antagonistic, to one that characterizes nature as being resilient when faced against harm and often victimized by people. Mary Oliver’s poem also titled “The Fish” offers a response to Bishop’s idea that people are harming nature, by providing another reason as to why people are harming nature, which is due to how people are unable to view nature as something that exists and goes beyond the purpose of serving human needs and offers a different interpretation of the relationship between man and nature. Oliver believes that nature serves as subsidence for humans, both physically and spiritually. Unlike Bishop who finds peace through understanding her role in nature’s plight and acceptance at the merging between the natural and human worlds, Oliver finds that through the literal act of consuming nature can she obtain a form of empowerment that allows her to become one with nature.
Nature has no compassion for the plight of the family, nor is it a malicious force; it is merely a power with constructive or destructive potential. We see its constructive side when it freezes Johnny to death.
Due to devastation caused by the dropping of the atomic bomb, man kind has only used nuclear weapons twice in war. In August 2026: There Will Come Soft Rains, the author, Ray Bradburry, writes about a nuclear holocaust in the year 2026. He writes about a house that services the nuclear explosion, and the house, which has advanced technology , performs daily activities to aid the Fetherstone family. The house is the only thing standing in Allendale, California after a nuclear explosion destroyed the entire city. The house has advanced technology including a stove that makes breakfast and disposes of the uneaten food, a voice clock that rings throughout the entire house reminding the Fetherstones to wake up and go to work, robot mice that clean the entire house everyday at 9:15, bath water that runs on a timer, and even a cigar dispenser that lights a cigar for Mr.Featherstone and disposes of the cigars ashes. Through descriptive literature, Ray Bradburry writes a short story on mankind's downfall when technology outpaces humanity, which in the ends shows how neither man or machine can win against nature.
Natural landscape almost entirely affects the course of McCandless’ life and journey as it attracts young adults such as McCandless and provide the obstacles needed for growth and revelations of reality. In the epigraph of Jack London’s White Fang, the wild is admittedly “the savage, frozen-hearted Northland Wild” where the land is personified to be “the masterful and incommunicable wisdom of eternity laughing at the futility of life and the effort of life”(9). The contrast of Jack London’s warning of the brutality of the wild and McCandless’ attraction to nature emphasizes the irony of McCandless’ glorification of Jack London. McCandless’ idealist nature causes him to mostly admire the grandeur and philosophical nature that the wild is described
Since the beginning of time, humans have always had some type of relationship with nature, whether it was negative or positive. Adam & Eve were exiled from paradise for eating from the forbidden tree. Neanderthals flourished living in caves while having constant interactions with nature. And now in this day in age the relationship continues. This ever-changing relationship between man and nature is the main focus of two writers, Wendell Berry and Terry Tempest Williams. Both writers have a similar voice and style in some aspects, yet differ in others.
Through the assistance of nature, Shakespeare tells of how humans are neither good, nor evil. Elements of the natural world, such as Mother Nature and the animal kingdom, are petitioned in the characters’ speech, as they use their different ideals of what nature is in order to rationalize their actions. In example, Lear sees himself as controller of t...
Throughout the history of western civilization, the human race has had a continuing relationship with nature and the environment. Progress has improved the way in which human beings use natural resources and the ways in which they work together to improve the quality of life. Developments in science and technology of the twentieth-century have greatly improved the way that humans interact. As the technological advancements of the twentieth-century progressed from the discovery of vaccinations to computer age technology, humans have learned to take a considerable amount of control over their lives and the environment as compared to the past, in which humans had very little control over nature. These progressions have had positive and negative effects on society. Positively, medical research has been able to allow the human race to lengthen life span and improve the work of genetics. Science has connected the globe through computer technology. The negative aspects of progression have some far-reaching consequences, such as new forms of imperialism, the atomic bomb, and destruction of the environment.
Through the ingenious works of poetry the role of nature has imprinted the 18th and 19th century with a mark of significance. The common terminology ‘nature’ has been reflected by our greatest poets in different meanings and understanding; Alexander Pope believed in reason and moderation, whereas Blake and Wordsworth embraced passion and imagination.
Throughout history, many individuals wish to discover and explain the relationship between nature and society, however, there are many complexities relating to this relationship. The struggle to understand how nature and society are viewed and connected derives from the idea that there are many definitions of what nature is. The Oxford dictionary of Human Geography (2003), explains how nature is difficult to define because it can be used in various contexts as well as throughout different time and spaces. As a result of this, the different understandings of what nature is contributes to how the nature society relationship is shaped by different processes. In order to better understand this relation there are many theorists and philosophers