Natural Principles

1642 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Aristotle physics force

The Basic Principles of Nature

Aristotle's Physics begins with an in-depth discussion on the basic principles of nature. Aristotle says that there are a certain number of basic principles that can account for nature’s processes. Aristotle came to the idea of the basic principles by synthesizing the theories of philosophers and drawing out the underlying principles that they all had in common. Aristotle found that the primary cause of all things coming to be is matter, form, and privation. 1In order to come to these conclusions of matter, form, and privation, Aristotle had to consider his predecessors theories. He was able to then find the truth and error in their arguments. He then commenced to dispel the error while retaining and applying the truth to his own philosophy. By coming up with his new theory he was able to correct problems using the theories of the early philosophers.

By studying all Pre-Socratic philosophical ideas concerning the basic principles, Aristotle was able to deduct the common denominator, common to all Pre-Socratic ideas, which was that in nature the basic principles had to be contradictory.

Thales was a mathematician that studied in Egypt and is well-known for his famous theorem about right angles. 2He is also celebrated for stating that water was the only principle of nature because without water all living things will die. The contraries of the water theory were the condensing and rarefying of the water which would make it into different forms.

Another example is Anaximenes, who said air was the primary source of nature because most things need oxygen to live. Anaximenes explains his doctrine of change by air: “ [Air] differs in essence in accordance with its rarity or density. Whe...

... middle of paper ...

...ange though its form may change solved the problem that some philosophers had of not believing in prime matter.

Aristotle’s analysis of the basic principles of the early philosophers was only the first step to his search for the discovery of the source of all natural processes. By establishing his first general argument for these basic principles matter, form and privation Aristotle could go on to investigate a variety of different topics, ranging from general topics like motion, causality, time, to systematic assessments and accounts of natural phenomena for all different kinds of natural entities.

Bibliography

1. Aristotle, Physics or Natural Healing. Edited by Glen Coughlin. south bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2004.

2. Fieser, James and Bradley Dowden. “Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” 1995. http://www.iep.utm.edu/ (accessed Apr. 29, 2011).

Show More
Related

  • The Crisis of European Sciences and Trascendental Phenomenology

    879 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...esent-day philosophers, we are part of a long historical path that started with Greek primal establishment, and is set to continue with future generations until the final establishment is realized. The concept of reductionism also tries to bring different things, different parts, together to form one whole, unified form. We can trace the origins of modern scientific trends back to Greek primal establishment. From the simplistic Socratic approach of ‘Who am I?’, philosophical self-reflection builds on thoughts and concepts of the likes of Galileo and Socrates until it reaches present thinking.

    Read More

  • Reconstruction of Aristotle's Argument from Physics Book 2, Chapter 8.

    614 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this paper, I offer a reconstruction of Aristotle’s argument from Physics Book 2, chapter 8, 199a9. Aristotle in this chapter tries to make an analogy between nature and action to establish that both, nature and action, have an end.

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Four Main Causes

    1966 Words  | 4 Pages

    To some the causes and effects of things are mutually exclusive, and coexistence with one another. When observing specific equipment or even life, the question stands that there must be an account that took place before such items ceased to exist. Particularly, Aristotle argues that each thing, whatever it may be, will have causes, or types of explanatory factors by which that thing can be explained. The significant knowledge of causes allows for specific accounts to be known. It’s like questioning what occurred first the chicken or the egg. Anything in life offers a question of cause; something must have been in order to bring about the nature of today. These causes are apparent in answering everyday questions, which in turn explains that the causes of life clarify the being of which stood before it and such causes amount to same entity.

    Read More

  • Mythic and Pre-Socratic Worldviews

    1136 Words  | 3 Pages

    Graham, Daniel W. "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2014

    Read More

  • Jay Gatsby: The Tragic Hero in The Great Gatsby

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    The. The "Aristotle". Home Page English 112 VCCS Litonline. Web. The Web.

    Read More

  • What Are A Father's Rights Concerning an Abortion

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ernational Journal Of Applied Philosophy 21.1 (2007): 1-24. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Feb. 2014.

    Read More

  • The Unmoved Mover: God in Aristotle’s Metaphysics

    1471 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rather, Aristotle attempts to tackle some of the most fundamental questions of human experience, and at the crux of this inquiry is his argument for the existence of an unmoved mover. For Aristotle, all things are caused to move by other things, but the unreasonableness of this going on ad infinitum means that there must eventually be an ultimate mover who is himself unmoved. Not only does he put forth this argument successfully, but he also implies why it must hold true for anyone who believes in the ability to find truth through philosophy. Book XII of the Metaphysics opens with a clear statement of its goal in the first line of Chapter One: to explore substances as well as their causes and principles. With this idea in mind, Chapter One delineates the three different kinds of substances: eternal, sensible substances; perishable, sensible substances; and immovable substances.

    Read More

  • Classical Philosophers

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristotle’s works were modern for the time. He had distinguished dolphins and whales from fish, created a classification system quite similar to the one in place today, and formed many astronomical ideas, which were not far from the truth. It should also be noted that in medieval times, he gained a great many followers after some of his preserved works were found, and the disciples of the late philosopher generally believed his works as absolute truth.

    Read More

  • Physics of Aristotle

    1385 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is a generally accepted fact that Aristotle's physics and astronomy were the weakest of his areas of study. He made discoveries and developed theories in biology, ethics, and drama that still hold a great deal of importance in those fields today. However, many of his theories and hypotheses were not disproved unitl the nineteenth century and his original concept of a uniform and consistant flow of time was accepted by Newton and still has its place in physics today. We really cannot discount the scientific contributions of a man whose ideas have survived for over 2000 years.

    Read More

  • Aristotle

    1768 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle’s notion of cause represents his idea of how everything comes into being. All change involves something coming from out of its opposite. These causes are split into four: material cause, efficient cause, formal cause and final cause. Change takes place in any of these causes. A material cause is one that explains what something is made out of. An efficient cause is what the original source of change is. A formal cause is the form or pattern of which a thing corresponds to. And a final cause is the intended purpose of the change. All of these causes Aristotle believes explains why change comes to pass. A good example of this is a baseball. The material cause of a baseball is are the materials of which it is made of, so corkwood, stitching, with a rubber core and wrapped in leather. The efficient cause of the baseball would the factory where the ball was made or where the materials were manipulated until they corresponded into a baseball. The formal cause of the ba...

    Read More

  • The Woman in Love by Simone de Beauvoir

    1291 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." Beauvoir, Simone de []. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .

    Read More

  • Distinctions and Comparisons between Aristotle and Plato

    1671 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle disagreed with Plato’s ideology of an immaterial world and an invisible world not seen by the human eye. The system of Aristotle’s logical explanations against Plato’s theory of forms, were made through observations of the physical world. Aristotle unlike Plato trusted the senses as a tool to judge reality. He found Plato’s theory of forms defective, for he thought true reality contained concrete objects that one perceived through the senses. To oppose Plato’s theory, Aristotle created his doctrine of categories.

    Read More

  • Reflection Paper On Aristotle

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristotle, a name well known even now like the gods of ancient Greece such as Zeus and Poseidon, his name is well known because of the questions he asked and the way he viewed the world that would make those of a simple mind scratch their heads. People whom do not question anything think he is insane and by right he may have been a little mad, but we as humans are all a little off kilt. As this you can look at the views of Aristotle and if you are not one of a simple mind and can look at it in a critical thinking way, you can analyze his views to see if you agree or disagree that in fact he thinks that all things in this world are physical, and that everything has a purpose. Aristotle is correct in the case that all things are physical, because are matter, he also does not bring religion into his statement, yet does not discredit an artisan; he also states that all things do in fact have a purpose, and are something believable.

    Read More

  • Aristotle Reflection Paper

    1447 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aristotle uses his matter/form distinction to answer the question “What is soul?” and explains through his hylomorphic composition (matter, form, the compound of matter and form) to show that the body requires the soul and vice versa. He believes that compounds which are alive, are things that have souls and it is their souls that make them living things. In this essay, I will present Aristotle’s argument of the soul and whether he is successful in arguing for the mutual dependance of soul and body.

    Read More

  • Essay On Aristotle's View On The Self

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although Aristotle grew up under the ideas of Plato, through time he began to develop his own theories and views about philosophical thoughts (Aristotle Biography, 2015). Aristotle believed that in order to understand the natural world to the fullest, one must use each of the five senses, all of which we use to this day. Aristotle also had his own views of the world, especially the astronomy of it. He believed the earth was at the center of the universe and the remaining planets, only 5 known at the time, were circling around it (Worldview of Ancient Greece - Socrates, Plato & Aristotle, n.d.). We know now that his views on this matter are not taught and the planets revolve around the

    Read More

More about Natural Principles

Open Document