Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The elements of national identity
The elements of national identity
National identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The elements of national identity
National identity represents one country’s traditions and culture. When we talk about the national identity that includes language, traditions, customs, religions, and its ethnicity. My intention is to show the culture and spirit of nation is influence and reflects in its identity.
At first, I want to talk about identity based on the tradition and culture associated with all aspects of architecture and nationalism. Throughout the architecture history, people can see the culture influrences together with geographical, social and political. And architecture become an important ways to learn and understand about the identity of a culture.
Anthony Smith argues that national identity has the feature of continuity that can transmit and persist through generations. National identity, like other social identities, engenders positive emotions such as pride and love to one’s nation. It is a cultural-political community that has become conscious of its autonomy, unity, and particular interests.
…show more content…
Even though struggling with these different diversities, Myanmar is always been binding with its main religious identity, Buddhism. The people of Myanmar are predominantly Buddhist though there has other minor religions like Christian, Hinduism and Islam. With many religions practiced in Myanmar, there were diverse range of indigenous cultures exist and is manifested in its language and traditions.
Shwedagon pagoda is the one of the most famous pagoda of Myanmar and it is known as the highest and oldest pagoda in the world. The pagoda contains important Buddhist relics including hairs of Gautama Buddha. The pagoda is not only the holiest shrine in Myanmar and it also the symbol of Buddhist nationalism to the lives of the Myanmar people. As the monument symbolizing this religion, we can say that Shwedagon Pagoda as a symbol of a true Burmese national
...has a national identity, an identity borne of many cultures and in the spirit of cooperation.
Cultural identity is very important for every ethnic group as it shapes the culture of that particular faction and therefore, a certain culture cannot realize its own values until it is exposed to another one. II. Nationalism Nationalism revolves around the attitude that people have about their national identity. It is the national days, symbols, music and the anthem, among other values, that bind a nation together. The Hispanics are nationalists who are proud of their traditions and history.
The aspects that nativism focuses on the change throughout time. Nativism is the extreme opposition of a minority based on the majority’s perception of the minority being foreign and endangering their way of life. (Hingham, 2002) Nativism is based on the fears that the majority population has. If we were able to look into the future it is reasonable to believe that issues that Americans hold dearest and seek to protect would be much more different than the ones that we care about currently. It is important then to keep in mind these fears are often focused on minority groups that very rarely have anything to do with the issue and more importantly a way to protect themselves. As we look at nativism’s progress through American history we will
Lintner, Bertil. The resistance of the monks: Buddhism and activism in Burma. New York, NY: .
Culture and identity are two very strange ideas. They are received at a very young age, yet they are very hard to give to someone else. They will affect you for the rest or your life, yet for the most part you are born into them. However, they soon become very important to us and we cannot, no matter what we do, live without them. They are a part of us, and a vital aspect of society. However, it took me a very long time to recognize that I had an identity and a little while after that before I knew what it was.
Throughout history, architecture has been employed in the service of politics, as symbols of the state. Architecture is therefore shaped by the national traditions in the pursuit of projects of identity, modernity, power, and prestige. A building is not merely a walled structure, but a metaphor for national ideology as it embodies the civic life of the citizens that it houses, as well as the ideals of the nation within which it resides. This paper will explore three varying architectural periods and examine the interaction between nationalism and the building styles that developed either as a means to express it.
The connection between the homes of a culture and the people themselves is indisputable. The home is the setting where the microcosm of a nations idiosyncrasies develop and are applied, but even further than that, the very building itself demonstrates a deep connection to the people. Buildings reflect what is inside through the purpose for construction, construction itself, visible attributes, and even the location of the building is critical. All of these factors demonstrate the connection of architecture and a nation's identity or culture.
The United States as a country has always been an entity unique amongst the world’s myriad of nations: a conglomeration of cultures, ethnic groups and religious backgrounds from around the planet, all fused together to yield something entirely new. Since its very inception, those who dwell within its borders have attempted to ascertain the makeup of the American identity, in order to pin down how exactly one can come to be considered as an American themselves. This is inherently quite a subjective issue, but the conversation primarily boils down to three core factors that make the American people who they are: a dedication to preserving the natural rights of every human being, a belief in the importance of the individual in deciding their own
“When Race Becomes Even More Complex: Toward Understanding the Landscape of Multiracial Identity and Experiences”
The view of identity seems to be defined by facial features and social constructed views. Depending on the recent look of someone it may just be more then just color but also background. In this essay I will explain how I relate to some recent views based on philosophers I may agree and disagree with in order to describe my identity. Identity is much more then just being labeled as a race, it can be based on much more.
Print. The. national identity, n. OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2014. Web. The Web.
Arguably neither are satisfactory in providing a complete explanation so it is necessary to combine both approaches for increased explanatory power. Conner (1994) offers a primordialist view of identity as evolving from history and myth of a common homeland, or ‘a group of people who believe they are ancestrally related” (cite) This belief arises from psychological and emotional attachments developed through a mutual culture, language or religion. This idea that identity is manifested from a group that believe they are ancestrally related arises from the inability of many primordialist claims to depict an actual origin or trace back their roots with certainty. This leads to the rise of myths of common ancestry or homeland. Other primordialists believe that identity is innate, or a ‘given’, prescribed by birth through blood ties or kinship bonds, while it can also be attained though mutual culture, religion, and language. (cite) This biological and psychological attachment form the ethnic core and is the basis of nation identity These views of identity through the primordialist lens is that it is fixed once given, which also acts to strengthen the primordial bond between the organic community. This also suggests that ethnic identity forms the core for national identity, and cannot be separated. This means that
Salazar, J.M., 1998, ‘Social identity and national identity’, in Worchel, S., Morales, J.F., Páez, D., Deschamps, J.-C. (Eds.), Social Identity, International Perspectives. Sage, London.
Collier has presented the notions of ethnic identity and national identity. These two types of identities clash within certain international governments. Collier explained, “A society can function perfectly well if its citizens hold multiple identities, but problems arise when those subnational identities arouse loyalties that override loyalty to the nation as whole” (Collier, 2009, pg. 51). Essentially this quote explains that ethnic identities create a sense of loyalty to one’s ethnic group rather than one’s national identity. This type of loyalty causes discrepancies within the political structure of one’s nation. Collier focuses on the Kenyan government to help represent his claims.
The role of language in the creation of a national identity is complex, controversial, but fundamentally powerful. National languages are not simply means of communication; rather they can also act as a symbolic representation of a national identity, providing insight into a nation’s perceived religious, ethnic and historical status. This essay will consider the role language plays in a national identity, questioning the power it holds and the implications it has on the notion of nationalism. Additionally, it will address whether or not the ability to plan language in relation to a national identity is really as powerful as it seems by probing into the process of language planning – what elements are considered, who is responsible for carrying out the process and what effect does it