Response To 'The Life Of Fredrick Douglass'

1087 Words3 Pages

The Life of Fredrick Douglass Response Paper Fredrick Douglass once said that “Without a struggle, there can be no progress.” Douglass grew up as a slave and when he was 20 years old he took the riskiest journey of his life to escape from slavery. The Narrative of Fredrick Douglass has a lot of points to reflect on; however, here are couples I’ve found important. His autobiography gave a glimpse into the horrors of slavery. The author shares his experiences of seeing his aunt being beaten and not knowing anything even their own birthdates. He makes assumptions about the slave owners lives before becoming slave masters, and assumes the reader will have sympathy for the slaves and try to see their side. One question I asked myself while reading …show more content…

“After rolling up his sleeves, he commenced to lay on the heavy cow skin , and soon the warm, red blood (amid heart-rending shrieks from her, and horrid oaths from him) came dripping to the floor” This is very strong evidence against slavery as the woman is being beaten and yelled at for being a slave. She is screaming and yet the master does not stop, this shows that he lacks the humanity to care if she is in pain if she is being tortured, thus making a point that slavery is wrong. Also, Fredrick Douglas describes the death of his mother. “She died when I was about seven years old, on one of my master’s farms, near Lee’s Mill. I was not allowed to be present during her illness, at her death, or burial I received the tidings of her death with much the same emoticons I should have probably felt at the death of a stranger.” This is another part of the text that shows what slavery has done. It took a strong bond a mother has with its son and threw it away. Fredrick Douglass feels as sad as he would’ve felt at the death of a stranger. He was denied access to his mother so he didn’t know his mother well and wasn’t as sad at her …show more content…

Firstly they were very cruel. “I have seen him whip a woman, causing the blood to run a half an hour at a time: and this too in the midst of her crying children pleading for their mother’s release.” This shows that the masters who were whipping were trying to strike fear into not only the women’s heart, but the child’s as well. This is wrong because children are seen as innocent and a new beginning and to have someone torture them and watch their mother being beaten is very morally wrong. Then, there was Mr. Plummer. “Mr. Plummer was a miserable drunkard, a profane swearer, and a savage monster. I have known him to cut and slash women’s heads so horribly, that even master would be enraged at his cruelty, and would threaten to whip if he did not mind himself.” If a master is enraged at the cruelty at something it must be very harsh because originally masters would whip, hang, or starve slaves so for someone to be mad at cruelty it must be

Open Document