Narrative Of Frederick Douglass Rhetorical Analysis

886 Words2 Pages

Frederick Douglass is a Romanticist and a Realist. His slave narrative reflects the intentions of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau in their works “Self-Reliance” and “Civil-Disobedience” as well as meeting the characteristics of Realism. Fredrick Douglass is a Romanticist. His work “The Narrative of Fredrick Douglass” has rhetoric that relates to “Self-Reliance”. Towards the middle of the work, Douglass explains the connection between education and Christian literature. “I read them over and over again with unabated interest. They gave tongue to interesting thoughts of my own soul, which had frequently flashed through my mind” (Douglass, 39). When Douglass reads “The Columbian Orator”, he reads the book repeatedly because it fuels …show more content…

He depicts his death this way because he wants to provide the realities of being enslaved, and he uses this truth to connect with the reader’s emotional sense. He creates pathos in his rhetoric that is gruesome and impactful to entice the reader. Secondly, Douglass’s work also meets the characteristic “Class is important”. Douglas writes, “.she very kindly commenced to teach me the A, B, C.Mr. Auld found out what was going on, and at once forbade Mrs. Auld to instruct me further,” (Douglass, 33). Class plays a large role in the work, especially due to Douglass’s intelligence, which is dissimilar to the other slaves. The mistress and the slave are on two opposite ends of the stick when it comes to education. This disparity immediately shows the importance of social and economic class in the antebellum era because class is what the system of slavery is rooted upon. Mr. Auld stops Mrs. Auld from educating Douglass because he knows that slaves should not receive an education and if they did, social class would not be important. Class is important in the work because it sets up the conflict between the slaves and the enslavers and it showcases the systemic nature of slavery

Open Document